Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
Glad you got to have some fun at the expense of others, cause we sure did.
Lighten up. It's not like someone personally attacked you or your loved ones.
Wrong, Phreak, these morons just attacked and slandered my sister just because they disagree with her point of view!
Ok, kidding, she's not my sister. I couldn't help it. I do the same whenever someone tells a racial joke within earshot, "Hey man, my mother is
"
fill in blank"
No need in lightening up, I wasn't heavy or bent out of shape. I was merely making a point. Maybe the point was missed. The point was that
Liberals are good at attacking and insulting the person when they can't defend their position or rationally attack the other side's position, and
this is all but always the case. Almost to the poster, that is what happened here. Notice, when I did the same thing, my post was noted for that.
Anyway, the point was made, it kind of went over some heads, but that's ok. And you're right, Phreak, whe isn't known to me or kin to me, but go
and reread some of the horrible posts. There was no intellect in them at all, no topic of debate, only shallow, petty attacks and insults.
Max Cleland lost no limbs due to combat or heroism. The incident involving the grenade was unfortunate and tragic, but it still makes for no war hero
as the Democrats try and paint him to be.
taibunsuu, you say he should be bowed down to because he went on to lead a productive life. Sorry, I don't see a man doing what a man should do as
being worthy of worship. Today, I do what doctors said I wouldn't be able to do, but I do it because I want to lead a productive life, too. Don't
worship me, pal. And furthermore, again a lie is told, "Ann Coulter makes a living off denigrating triple amputee Vietnam Veterans. " No, she does
not make a living in such manner, and that was a foolish statement. And again, you couldn't help say it in such manner, "triple amputee Vietnam
Veteran", as if he is an amputee because of enemy fire. Don't lecture me on what the enemy does, did or might do, I'm not soft civilian.
Regardless of what the enemy does did or might do, Mr. Cleland made it clear what he was doing. It is all regardless, as the question is not on Max,
but on the liberal Democrats. That is very clear and evident, were you to bother reading the columns. Were you to bother reading her columns, you'd
se that Max has been a point of only a couple of her many columns, and you'd see she did not "denigrate" him in the least.
Are you trying to say that this man, who you say is leading a productive life (I'm sorry, I thought he is a politician), a huge war hero, and you
feel you have to defend him from a girl even when she isn't even attacking him? You can't figure out that Mr. Cleland is peripheral to the point of
topic, or is this a typical and usual attempt to muddy the waters?
What you folks might want to keep in mind is that Ann Coulter isn't writing to win your hearts and minds over, she isn't trying to change America by
making the liberal see the light, she writes merely for the entertainment of the conservative crowd. Notice the humor that is heavily laced with
sarcasm. She sings to the choir. If you are a liberal and don't like her, don't read her material, it isn't meant for you, anyway.
