I refused to disclose my annual income to PAYPAL and they froze my funds !, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 89 times


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 10:19 AM by ZindoDoone
reply to post by boncho



Can you imagine the amount of money they are making off the float if they do this to many of their clients. Banks here in my state did this for years holding pay checks for 2 weeks sometimes 'to make sure they clear'! All the time investing that held money to make a percentage on the float! When checks bounced because of this they made money on the charges for insufficient funds at 35-50 bucks a whack!! They finally passed laws to stop it here. This could be a huge scam!
Zindo


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 10:43 AM by amraks
reply to post by michael1983l



We have a small claims court in OZ
The court of petty sessions I think its referred too.


But most importantly we a ombudsman
edit on 16-5-2012 by amraks because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 10:43 AM by HolgerTheDane2
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by sligtlyskeptical
It appears that you used false information (income) on their account forms. That is enough to shut down your account. I would advise if anyone else has a problem disclosing their income than do not write a note saying that you are lying. I usually check the box with the highest income. You get better offers in the mail that way.



That is absolute garbage. He stated he selected one box on a list of boxes but there was no other option. At the very least paypal should have called him and asked for the proper information. Instead they justify taking the person's money with this?



Whoaahh Neddie,

They don't justify anything with this wrongful ticking...

He claims that in HIS opinion that is their reason for doing it.

We should pay attention to the text in his letter that PayPal had registered several account in his name and ONE of them was the critical point which is why they closed both/all the accounts until further notice.
They also clearly state that this is for a period UP TILL 180 days (more if required) - not minimum 180 days as written elsewhere in these posts.

PayPal lists three possible reason for this NOT anything about yearly income.

We are presented with some facts followed by some assumptions.

Why are we told that OP reluctantly created an account and then see in the letter that they have registered multiple accounts and that one or more is against policy?

"Personally, I wasn't too happy with this form of payment as I'd never used PayPal in the past and truthfully, just couldn't be bothered with going through all the hassle of setting up a PayPal account. Anyway, to keep the purchaser happy, I agreed to use PayPal.
"

edit on 16-5-2012 by HolgerTheDane2 because: extra stuff needed



reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 10:49 AM by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by ZindoDoone



Paypal does this to 30% of vendor transactions:

As of December 2011, PayPal is embroiled in a controversy over their policy of holding 30% of vendor transactions for 90 days, which PayPal argues is intended to make funds available to customers in the event that a transaction is found to be fraudulent; to provide PayPal the funds to refund the seller. But PayPal has refused to provide information regarding the reasons particular sellers have been identified to have funds reserved. There is also criticism about the perceived arbitrariness of the 90-day waiting period, when customers have only 45 days to file a claim against a seller, and complaints about the fact that PayPal has not paid interest on the funds held back. Many sellers have surmised that the policy is due to a desire on the part of PayPal to use their funds for investing. There is a class action suit pending regarding the practice


For every $100,000 in vendor transactions, Paypal freezes $30,000 for 90 days. Hmmmm....


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 11:00 AM by ZindoDoone
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux



You think maybe I have hit on something??? LOL
PayPal has been a shady business since it's inception. Nothing would surprise me with Ebay and PayPal!
Zindo


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 11:03 AM by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by tauristercus





PAYPAL are legalized extortionists


There is no such thing as "legal extortion". If it is extortion, and you may have a strong enough case to prove it is, then it is unlawful. Assuming you've done your due diligence, or will continue to do so and not get anywhere with the "customer service" representatives, then file a verified complaint in Palo Alto California where the company exists, against its founders, Ken Howery, Max Levchin, Elon Musk, Luke Nosek and Peter Thiel for extortion.

Make sure you have sufficient evidence to prove extortion, because a verified complaint is an oath signed under penalty of perjury. Assuming you have the proper proof of extortion, it matters not where you live, you can and should have these racketeers imprisoned for their crime. Here is what the California Penal Code regarding extortion has to say:

520. Every person who extorts any money or other property from another, under circumstances not amounting to robbery or carjacking, by means of force, or any threat, such as is mentioned in Section 519, shall be punished by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for two, three or four years.


Put the bastards in prison! Or, at the very least, make them pay back the money they stole from you plus damages.


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 11:07 AM by boncho
Originally posted by FeatheredSerpent
reply to
post by boncho




They will not take the money,have they refunded it to the buyer?If not they will be holding from both partys until they have finished there investigation.

May i ask was there a red flag on paypal next to the buyers payment?

Regards to all


The other part of the transaction was fulfilled though, the buyer received their merchandise. If they have refunded it to the buyer, they have taken it from the seller...


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 11:09 AM by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by sligtlyskeptical



Paypal would have to prove the O.P. lied in order to breach the contract. Can you prove the O.P. lied? I doubt it, and I doubt Paypal can prove it either. Failing that, a breach of contract is a breach of contract, and as I've stated earlier if the O.P. can prove this was over refusal to report annual income, this is indeed extortion.


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 11:09 AM by boncho
reply to post by HolgerTheDane2



Good point, the OPs story and paypal's explanation do not match.

I suppose we do not have the full story. Whether it be a mistake on either side.


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Chance meeting with a Time Traveler?
  Posted 5 days ago with 90 member flags
Black Helicopter Flying Around My House!
  Posted 17 days ago with 17 member flags
London has that sound again. Happening right now!
  Posted 2 days ago with 14 member flags
Where Does That Leave Me?
  Posted 18 days ago with 13 member flags
Dammit! Time travel AGAIN!!!!!
  Posted 11 days ago with 13 member flags
Strange Sounds Heard From The Sky!! (+Audio/Video)
  Posted 13 days ago with 11 member flags
Did I experience a time rift/portal?
  Posted 5 days ago with 10 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting in 6 minutes.
Today's Show: ATS Live:161:Trees,Ghosts,Phantom 'Copters,Pshop,Teaching,Jail,Violence,MajorTom,Animals,