It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
Yes I realized that. Anyway...so it's not the moon apparently? To a layman like me...this looks pretty interesting. Since we "know" there is only one sun in our solar system, the instant reaction is to call this a camera artifact...I understand that. But somehow...it doesn't seem to behave like it should. The object appears completely unconnected to the camera and it's movement. Must be something outside.
Originally posted by AmazonOfArtemis
It sure does look like a celestial body - That being said, I offer no thought as to which one it is.
Despite the Planet X theory being ridiculed beyond ridiculous, it has always been a theory that really resonates with me. Out of all of the wild and wacky theories out there, a dwarf star making its rounds around the solar system just seems... plausible and logical.
I keep an open mind, I'm not blindsided by the HUGE campaign to discredit this theory, in my opinion, the very fact that this subject is so vehemently discouraged, keeps me intrigued...edit on 16-5-2012 by AmazonOfArtemis because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sirric
This is nothing more than a double lens optical illusion. The object is the original sun reflecting off the second polarized lens.
Cased Solve, no second sun here.
Sirric
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by sirric
This is nothing more than a double lens optical illusion. The object is the original sun reflecting off the second polarized lens.
Cased Solve, no second sun here.
Sirric
A lens flare will move as the camera is moved, it is easy to see that there is one lens flare present that moves with camera movement, just as it is easy to see the object in question does not move. Is that difficult to follow?
Originally posted by sirric
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by sirric
This is nothing more than a double lens optical illusion. The object is the original sun reflecting off the second polarized lens.
Cased Solve, no second sun here.
Sirric
A lens flare will move as the camera is moved, it is easy to see that there is one lens flare present that moves with camera movement, just as it is easy to see the object in question does not move. Is that difficult to follow?
Are you aware of the optical illusion caused by older or low quality polarized sunglasses? When looking at a bright light, there will be a double effect of the filtered reflection of said bright light without the light around the object, hence what we see here is that optical illusion in all it's glory.
I've watched the sun and moon and stars more than the average person, my job required my to do so with many different lens so I know this is an optical illusion.
Sirric
Originally posted by HawkeyeNation
Lens flare - No...check
Nibiru - No...check
Some sort of lens illusion - Yes...check
I'm no professional here but having seen probably close to 100 of these videos on this site alone I have come to the conclusion that this is some sort of lens illusion.
It's not coincidence that when the Sun hides behind the clouds the second object disappears as well. Also when the sun reappears the 2nd object appears thru the clouds.
Originally posted by dawnprince
To all you "Two Sun " believers.
An easy way to settle this nonsense once and for all .
Borrow a welding mask and go take a look at the sun .
If you don't spot anything unusual then it is obviously a camera anomaly that causes the second sun to appear.
If you do spot anything , why not attempt to film it too ?
Have fun
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by HawkeyeNation
Lens flare - No...check
Nibiru - No...check
Some sort of lens illusion - Yes...check
I'm no professional here but having seen probably close to 100 of these videos on this site alone I have come to the conclusion that this is some sort of lens illusion.
Is this a new form of logic?
It's not coincidence that when the Sun hides behind the clouds the second object disappears as well. Also when the sun reappears the 2nd object appears thru the clouds.
If the object had anything to do with artifacts, lens flares, optical illusions it WOULD remain in front of the cloulds, how can a lens flare hide behind the clouds? The FACT that it goes from being visible to hidden behind the cloulds is excellent PROOF that it is not a lens flare, artifact or optical illusion. Please observe the other actual lens flare on the video to learn how actual lens flares apppear.
Originally posted by dawnprince
Borrow a welding mask and go take a look at the sun .
If you don't spot anything unusual then it is obviously a camera anomaly that causes the second sun to appear.
If you do spot anything , why not attempt to film it too ?
Have fun
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
The guy who shot this video shot another one the next day, this time with English narration instead of Slovak:
www.youtube.com...
Pretty obvious again it is not a lens flare.
Originally posted by dawnprince
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
Your statement is rubbish .
Nobody is capturing anything , other than mirrored images .
When somebody spots it with the naked eye , then you may be taken seriously , but we both know that will never happen