Sugar makes you stupid: Study shows high-fructose diet sabotages learning, memory, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 16-5-2012 @ 03:01 AM by elevenaugust

Sugar makes you stupid: Study shows high-fructose diet sabotages learning, memory


Medical Express
Study shows high-fructose diet sabotages learning, memory.

Attention, college students cramming between midterms and finals: Binging on soda and sweets for as little as six weeks may make you stupid...

A new UCLA rat study is the first to show how a diet steadily high in fructose slows the brain, hampering memory and learning — and how omega-3 fatty acids can counteract the disruption. The peer-reviewed Journal of Physiology publishes the findings in its May 15 edition.
(visit the link for the full news article)



Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
Sugar Should Be Regulated As Toxin, Researchers Say
High Fructose Corn Syrup is killing all of us
The Sugar Conspiracy
edit on 16-5-2012 by Gemwolf because: Fixed link and title



reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 03:16 AM by Ameilia
reply to post by elevenaugust



Your link is currently going to this article:

New Findings May Hold Key to Gaia Hypothesis

I believe the source you meant to link is this one:

Sugar Makes You Stupid: Study Shows High-Fructose Diet Sabotages Learning, Memory

I also believe that this article is not talking about sugar but rather it is talking about high fructose corn syrup. These are two entirely different things.


The UCLA team zeroed in on high-fructose corn syrup, an inexpensive liquid six times sweeter than cane sugar, that is commonly added to processed foods, including soft drinks, condiments, applesauce and baby food. The average American consumes more than 40 pounds of high-fructose corn syrup per year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. "We're not talking about naturally occurring fructose in fruits, which also contain important antioxidants," explained Gomez-Pinilla, who is also a member of UCLA's Brain Research Institute and Brain Injury Research Center. "We're concerned about high-fructose corn syrup that is added to manufactured food products as a sweetener and preservative."


This makes your thread title totally incorrect, if you would like to rephrase.



reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 03:19 AM by seenavv
Originally posted by Ameilia
reply to
post by elevenaugust



Your link is currently going to this article:

New Findings May Hold Key to Gaia Hypothesis

I believe the source you meant to link is this one:

Sugar Makes You Stupid: Study Shows High-Fructose Diet Sabotages Learning, Memory

I also believe that this article is not talking about sugar but rather it is talking about high fructose corn syrup. These are two entirely different things.


The UCLA team zeroed in on high-fructose corn syrup, an inexpensive liquid six times sweeter than cane sugar, that is commonly added to processed foods, including soft drinks, condiments, applesauce and baby food. The average American consumes more than 40 pounds of high-fructose corn syrup per year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. "We're not talking about naturally occurring fructose in fruits, which also contain important antioxidants," explained Gomez-Pinilla, who is also a member of UCLA's Brain Research Institute and Brain Injury Research Center. "We're concerned about high-fructose corn syrup that is added to manufactured food products as a sweetener and preservative."


This makes your thread title totally incorrect, if you would like to rephrase.

weird, even the article you linked is titled incorrectly... the study itself was done on high fructose corn syrup


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 03:31 AM by Miraj
reply to post by Ameilia



They are pretty much the same thing, if you look into the chemistry.

The only difference between 'sugar' and Fructose, is that sugar has a weak bond connecting fructose and glucose, which dissolves about roughly the second it hits stomach acid.


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 03:39 AM by g146541
reply to post by Ameilia



Thank you for being the first to point out that sugar is NOT High Fructose Corn Syrup, as they are most definately NOT the same animal.
The "obesity epidemic" started about 35ish years ago, and HFCS was introduced to the US public,... that's right 35ish years ago.
Humans have been using sugar, honey, molasses, Etc. (real sweetners) for a looooong time and no "obesity epidemic", pu an abombination sweetner in the food supply and look what happens.
The title on the OP's article was not wrong, it was written that way on purpose and I suspect both you and I know exactly why.
Shame on US for being duped so easily by men in long white coats...


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 03:41 AM by Ameilia
Originally posted by Miraj
reply to
post by Ameilia



They are pretty much the same thing, if you look into the chemistry.

The only difference between 'sugar' and Fructose, is that sugar has a weak bond connecting fructose and glucose, which dissolves about roughly the second it hits stomach acid.


Actually they are very much not the same. High Fructose Corn Syrup comes from corn.

Sugar comes from sugar beets or sugar cane.

These are totally different things, and it is important people realize the difference.

Source: Science.How Stuff Works


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 03:45 AM by elevenaugust
reply to post by Ameilia


Oupps, sorry everyone, I mixed up some other links I work on...
Thanks to Gemwolf for the correction.

This makes your thread title totally incorrect

Not mine, but MedicalXpress title, and BTW, if you read the whole paper, they clearly make the difference between High-fructose corn syrup and naturally fructose:

"We're not talking about naturally occurring fructose in fruits, which also contain important antioxidants," explained Gomez-Pinilla, who is also a member of UCLA's Brain Research Institute and Brain Injury Research Center. "We're concerned about high-fructose corn syrup that is added to manufactured food products as a sweetener and preservative."
edit on 16-5-2012 by elevenaugust because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 03:52 AM by g146541
reply to post by Miraj



LOL!!!
You saw that commercial and believed it too huh?
Hint: they lied.

This is a loooong vid but well worth the watch as it explains things in a molecular way but is still very understandable.
I will tell you, I am a diabetic and use NO, NONE, NADA , ZILCH High Fructose Corn Syrup in my diet.
I started looking at boxes, bags and cans and here in the US HFCS is hard to avoid, I eat almost NOTHING out of a box, bag, can, Etc. nowadays.
Ninety nine percent of the foods I eat come from scratch recipe's (lemme tell ya, homemade mac and cheese is faaaar superior to that box crap.)
I still eat sweets and I will tell you that my blood sugar is much more manageable now that I have cut out HFCS, it truly is poison to me and any other diabetic.
Another hint: the diabetes "epidemic" started roughly 35ish years ago, if you do not understand why, see my above post.
Why is everyone we know going diabetic?


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 03:55 AM by g146541
reply to post by elevenaugust



If you read the paper, the differentiate yes.
However, most people do NOT read beyond a title.


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 03:56 AM by Ameilia
Originally posted by elevenaugust
reply to
post by Ameilia


Oupps, sorry everyone, I mixed up some other links I work on...
Thanks to Gemwolf for the correction.

This makes your thread title totally incorrect

Not mine, but MedicalXpress title, and BTW, if you read the whole paper, they clearly make the difference between High-fructose corn syrup and naturally fructose:

"We're not talking about naturally occurring fructose in fruits, which also contain important antioxidants," explained Gomez-Pinilla, who is also a member of UCLA's Brain Research Institute and Brain Injury Research Center. "We're concerned about high-fructose corn syrup that is added to manufactured food products as a sweetener and preservative."
edit on 16-5-2012 by elevenaugust because: (no reason given)


Yes, your quote is the same quote I also chose above to highlight the difference.

And in my opinion, the author of the article intentionally misrepresented the study and its findings by the title he chose. He could have highlighted the fact that high fructose corn syrup specifically has been shown, in this study, to negatively impact the brain. Instead, he chose to begin with the sugar as if it is what negatively impacts the brain. The quotes from the persons in charge of the study are specific to the difference and it is rude of the author to imply otherwise.

That is why I suggested you might like to change your title, it was not out of malice.
edit on 5/16/12 by Ameilia because: spelling!




reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 04:19 AM by elevenaugust
reply to post by Ameilia


I understand, and thanks again to Gemwolf for being more specific by adding :"Study shows high-fructose diet sabotages learning, memory", which is more accurate.


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 07:13 AM by AuranVector
reply to post by elevenaugust



I welcome any research that shows High Fructose Corn Syrup to be the toxin that it is.

It's not only cheaper than regular refined beet or cane sugar, but it increases the appetite, and has been linked with obesity, diabetes, high cholesterol and cardio-vascular disease.

Refined sugar was bad enough, but this is much worse.

Diabolical of TPTB -- we are prompted to eat more junk food that cause diseases that require their prescription drugs. We buy more of their products and die sooner. It's a win-win for TPTB.


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 07:31 AM by troubleshooter
Originally posted by g146541
reply to
post by Ameilia



Thank you for being the first to point out that sugar is NOT High Fructose Corn Syrup, as they are most definately NOT the same animal.
The "obesity epidemic" started about 35ish years ago, and HFCS was introduced to the US public,... that's right 35ish years ago.
Humans have been using sugar, honey, molasses, Etc. (real sweetners) for a looooong time and no "obesity epidemic", pu an abombination sweetner in the food supply and look what happens.
The title on the OP's article was not wrong, it was written that way on purpose and I suspect both you and I know exactly why.
Shame on US for being duped so easily by men in long white coats...

35 years ago is also around the time engineered food oils were first introduced into the food chain.

Obesity is in lots of places were corn syrup is not commonly used...
...processed oils made using heat and chemical extraction are everywhere.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags