Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

7 Reflections w/ C2 & C3 with Jupiter's passing. Is it really Jupiter or something else sinister?

page: 1
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 16 2012 @ 01:53 AM
link   
I am calling this reflections only because if you count in the video, there are 7 similar objects that come popping out within the passing of Jupiter. They are located on the C3 of SOHO with the similar shape as Jupiter. Now, I am sorry, but this can't be a reflection if the sun flare is moving away from the Sun. And it's certainly not a cosmic ray or a Satellite. If you look in C3 it also looks like something is trailing it or is behind it. I recorded this using the Screen Recording Suite. Seemed to go a lot faster at downloading then on Jheiloviewer.

^Calling it Reflection because I already know what some of you are going to say.


Images if you don't want count the reflections in the video


Image if you don't want to watch the video


Video:


Enjoy
edit on 16-5-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)
edit on 16-5-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 16 2012 @ 02:02 AM
link   
A little knowledge (like how to access images) is a dangerous thing without the knowledge to know what you are looking at.

Notice how Jupiter is seen in every frame but your "reflections" are seen in only a single frame?
They are cosmic ray strikes. Why do you say they are "certainly not"?
edit on 5/16/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 02:08 AM
link   
Sorry, but all I see are objects that are only visible for one frame at a time.
Lots of random noise and spots.
In other words, exactly what cosmic ray strikes look like.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 02:14 AM
link   
objects that all conveniently look the same as Jupiter.

Yeah, okay.

Not a Laser cosmic ray.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 02:33 AM
link   
reply to post by Manhater
 


objects that all conveniently look the same as Jupiter.

And Mercury looks the same as Jupiter. And Venus looks the same as Jupiter. And comets look the same as Jupiter (except for their tails).

Notice how the "wings" are always perfectly horizontal to the frame? Do you think maybe that could have something to do with the rows of pixels in the sensors? All bright objects have the "wings" because of pixel "bleed".

What are those flying saucer-shaped objects in the LASCO images?

The "funny-looking spheroid" is a typical response of the SOHO LASCO coronagraph CCD detector to an object (planet or bright star) of small angular extent but so bright that it saturates the CCD camera so that "bleeding" occurs along pixel rows. There is a bright horizontal streak on either side of the image, because the charge leaks easier along the direction in which the CCD image is read out by the associated electronics.

sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov...

Energetic cosmic ray strikes produce the same effect.

Learn something about what you are looking at. Deny your own ignorance about it.

edit on 5/16/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 02:46 AM
link   
Oh,

whatever...

I just find it oh so convenient.

Not going to debate or argue with you.

It's just there if anyone wants to watch it.

Got to study and work tomorrow so I'm out.

Bishop takes Rook...
edit on 16-5-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 02:47 AM
link   
reply to post by Manhater
 


Bishop takes Rook...

"La la la" does not constitute a capture.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 02:49 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


I see someone doesn't play Chess.

You could of at least made a move to my pawn.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 02:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Manhater
 

Which bishop? Which rook? On which square? Where were the other pieces? It sure as hell wasn't an opening move.

You're right, somebody doesn't play chess.
edit on 5/16/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 03:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Ok guys...

No more chess.

I see nothing strange about this video.

I have to agree with phage, for maybe the first time ever.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:07 AM
link   
Phage and Manhater
At it again ?
Not even 10 minutes from the op
and the attack begins.


I know It is imperative for people to receive
correct information in all aspects of life.
But somehow This regular and enduring debate is starting to
make me feel like I am eve's dropping in on a
intimate and private disagreement.

It really makes me want to say..."Get a Room" for pete's sake.


Don't get me wrong I do appreciate all the knowledge
I obtain from either of you !
Just say'in



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:15 AM
link   
It is very simple and obvious what these objects are, yet some are in denial, and some are paid to obfuscate the truth.

If you are interested in what these objects are, here is a good explanation:

www.zetatalk.com...

and here:

poleshift.ning.com...

And if you are going to attempt to debunk this because you think it is "whacky" or something similar, please remember this website is called "Above Top Secret", not the "Ladies Home Digest", so if "conspiracies" bother you, maybe you had better visit other less controversial websites.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:25 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


Who are you directing your remarks to ?
Second line



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:28 AM
link   
I thinks it's obvious that Phage can be quite condescending in his way of showing you that you are wrong.
Phage, maybe if you didn't treat people like idiots, or 'talk down' to them, they wouldn't go running for the hills?

I would like to say that you probably don't realize that you are doing that ,but I have a feeling you do.

Just sayin'
Take it or leave it.


Edit: Manhater - Flag and Star for your effort.
edit on 16-5-2012 by Tripple_Helix because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 09:49 AM
link   
reply to post by Tripple_Helix
 


Phage is starting to remind of my sister.



"I am always right and you are always wrong"
"Period, no ifs, ands, or butts about it.
So, don't argue with me."


That's why I always walk away, just pointless to even argue.

I could be wrong this time. I don't know. I'm not perfect.
edit on 16-5-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 10:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by Manhater

I could be wrong this time. I don't know. I'm not perfect.


This time? How many times do you guys have to post the same types of SOHO images, with the same "sinister" cosmic ray strikes, before you get the hint? It's always the same...don't blame Phage for actually understanding what these "cameras" are seeing.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 10:25 AM
link   
reply to post by Manhater
 


Consider this if you will. Someone posts videos of microbes in water viewed through a microscope. They present inaccurate claims about what is seen. Wouldn't you want someone who does know what they're looking at to correct the misinformation?

Isn't this video layered, C2 and C3? It looks like something is out of sync. Have you seen anything wrong when viewing these separately?



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 10:29 AM
link   
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
 


I didn't check it separately.

I'll look tonight.
edit on 16-5-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 11:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by azureskys
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


Who are you directing your remarks to ?
Second line



I respect a reasoned argument, but when one resorts to mocking, belittling, insulting - basically anything derogatory, it is a) the mark of an insecure individual; or b) an effective tactic used by paid posters using HB Gary protocols otherwise known as sock puppets, shills, trolls - or the new one you find in actual job descriptions "knowledge management specialists".

It should be obvious who I am referring to, and it is certainly not the OP.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 11:22 AM
link   
reply to post by Tripple_Helix
 


Phage, maybe if you didn't treat people like idiots, or 'talk down' to them, they wouldn't go running for the hills?

If I am treated with respect I show the same. When I am consistantly called a disinfo agent and shill I will respond.
When I am presented with multiple lols about what I say I will not respond in kind but I will respond. If you will review the history of the OPs threads you may see what I am talking about.





new topics

top topics



 
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join