It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hdutton
I know you are not interested in my background in the handling and use of various explosives. That would not qualify me as knowing anything about the results to be expected from them being used.
Originally posted by hdutton
Why should anyone of us who are not comfortable with and continue to question the O S have to provide any answers for the reasons the towers fell as they did?
I think the burden of proof of the O S is still on those who support it.
Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
Originally posted by hdutton
I know you are not interested in my background in the handling and use of various explosives. That would not qualify me as knowing anything about the results to be expected from them being used.
Correct.
But what about the lack of explosions with the brissance and loudness typical of cutter charges on all audio recordings?
What is your opinion on that?
Originally posted by 4hero
Definte symmetry, and if the debunkers dont agree on 'perfect' symmetry it's a close to symmetry as you're gonna get with a controlled building collapse.
As for the footprint, these buildings fell straignt down, yeah maybe a few pieces of debris went outwards, but the bulk of all the buildings that collapsed went into it's own footprint. If you think otherwise please explain why you think it didnt.
Originally posted by Varemia
Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
Originally posted by hdutton
I know you are not interested in my background in the handling and use of various explosives. That would not qualify me as knowing anything about the results to be expected from them being used.
Correct.
But what about the lack of explosions with the brissance and loudness typical of cutter charges on all audio recordings?
What is your opinion on that?
He's just going to say that the recorded audio evidence is trumped by witnesses reporting random explosions throughout the day. It happens every time this is brought up. Apparently physical evidence is trumped by human perception in the moment.
"It's a bird!"
"It's a plane!"
"This video shows that it's a plane."
"But that person said they saw a bird! It must be a bird!"
Originally posted by 4hero
There are many videos with explosions going off in the background!
Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
Originally posted by 4hero
There are many videos with explosions going off in the background!
Yep.
But none of them have the loudness and brissance (you might want to look up that word in a dictionary before you respond) that are typical of RDX based cutter charges.
A person claiming to have experience with these types of explosives would understand this. I am just curious what his opinion will be.
Originally posted by 4hero
RDX is just a punt on your behalf, you have nothing to back this up, thermite is more probable based on particle findings.
The recordings were captured at a safe distance from the towers, and they were still audible, and as for the brissance, you certainly had that in close proximity.
Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
Ironically, a totally uncontrolled failure would be expected to be somewhat symmetrical.
Assymmetrical collapse would mean it was steered.
Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
Originally posted by 4hero
RDX is just a punt on your behalf, you have nothing to back this up, thermite is more probable based on particle findings.
Thermite doesn't explode brah. And thermite wasn't found either. Paint was found.
The recordings were captured at a safe distance from the towers, and they were still audible, and as for the brissance, you certainly had that in close proximity.
Delusionally wishing this to be true doesn't make it so...
Originally posted by 4hero
Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
Originally posted by 4hero
RDX is just a punt on your behalf, you have nothing to back this up, thermite is more probable based on particle findings.
Thermite doesn't explode brah. And thermite wasn't found either. Paint was found.
The recordings were captured at a safe distance from the towers, and they were still audible, and as for the brissance, you certainly had that in close proximity.
Delusionally wishing this to be true doesn't make it so...
I never said thermite did explode, you mentioned cutter charges, and I said thermite was used for that.
Why is it that when you OS huggers dont have any answers you throw the delusional card!
Yet another OS'er that cannot be taken seriously from now on!
Originally posted by 4hero
Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
Ironically, a totally uncontrolled failure would be expected to be somewhat symmetrical.
Assymmetrical collapse would mean it was steered.
Where did you pluck this junk science from?!
Yep.
But none of them have the loudness and brissance (you might want to look up that word in a dictionary before you respond) that are typical of RDX based cutter charges.
A person claiming to have experience with these types of explosives would understand this. I am just curious what his opinion will be.
Originally posted by Darkwing01
And yes thermite DOES explode, but it is not a HIGH explosive.
Second, I work right next a construction site for where they do controlled rock blasting on a daily basis. Let me explain to you what you hear: You hear the siren going off, and then you feel the floor the floor rumbling. You don't hear ANY higher frequency noise apart from the windows rattling.
Why?
Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
Logic. Something that truthers lack, BTW....
If something is perfectly random, then the distribution pattern will be fairly symmetrical. Like a bell curve. But this is not evidence for either CD nor natural collapse, cuz a CD could be steered.
Now if it is assymmetrical, then it WAS steered. But this is not evidence for CD nor for natural collapse either. For the same reason.
Therefore, the debris pattern means next to nothing.
Logic.
Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
Ok then...
You agree that thermite doesn't explode. So thermite isn't responsible for the explosions in your referenced videos, correct?
Therefore, these explosions are normal in big office fires, correct?
Or do you have an explanation for the explosions in those videos? Can't be thermite...
But those explosions are evidence for.... what?
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
Or are us 'conspiracy nutters' all delusional paranoid freaks?
Originally posted by 4hero
Nope, you're twisting round my words again, i never said it did, and I never said it didn't, i said that traces of thermite were found in the dust particles, and thermite was most likely used to cut the beams.
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
People, does this building fall in symmetry or not?
Here is a video showing multiple angles of WTC7 collapsing.
1- Does the entire building fall at once?
2- Does it fall into it's footrpint?
Good'old Dave says that we can't see that the south side collapsed in symmetry with the building, but given the side we can see does fall at close to free fall speed- then surely when that part moves out of the way when it collapses, the couth side would still be standing?
Or is he just a shill and it is blatantly obvious the entire building all comes down at the same time in a speed that assumes no resistance?
Just watch the collapse video, do you think it all comes down at the same time? Or are us 'conspiracy nutters' all delusional paranoid freaks?
Make up your own minds people! Don't listen to the shills.