It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Should we create a new Forum as "Obama's Lies".
Originally posted by sarra1833
It's extremely sad, yes. Makes me not ashamed to back Paul but ashamed that those who want things SO badly will go SO overboard that Ron steps back to get away from it.
Originally posted by freedom12
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Personally, I have to question your motivation in putting Dr Paul down 24/7.
I wonder what principles you stand upon OutKast, because they definitly don't involve respecting or even utilizing the Constitution.
Maybe someday you could explain to your fellow ATSer's what values and beliefs you have, instead of constantly bashing Dr Paul for every breathe he takes??
Originally posted by jlm912
The founding fathers didn't aim for war with their revolution, either. They just wanted a proper voice in the British Parliament, but the brush fires were set and it got out of their hands.
It was rather ridiculous and disrespectful to boo those people off the stage, though.
I'd be nervous, too, if I were in Paul's shoes. Not only for his son's career, but if Ron Paul's movement breaks off into something bigger and it fails, his name will be historically tarnished.edit on 15-5-2012 by jlm912 because: (no reason given)
“Our campaign will continue to work in the state convention process. We will continue to take leadership positions, win delegates, and carry a strong message to the Republican National Convention that Liberty is the way of the future,” Paul wrote. “Moving forward, however, we will no longer spend resources campaigning in primaries in states that have not yet voted. Doing so with any hope of success would take many tens of millions of dollars we simply do not have.”
Read more: swampland.time.com...