Originally posted by spiritualarchitect
reply to post by ButterCookie
It is difficult for those who cannot accept it because of their EGO.
They do not want to admit to someone smarter than them.
ironic considering this could be said of AAT believers.
the "evidence" for AAT is based on nothing but cherry picking and ignorance not real evidence.
i mean how many times do we have to hear "the pyramids couldn't have been built by humans, they are too precise!" even though the people back then
understood math and the pyramid is pretty dang easy to build.
is the claim based on knowledge? or is it based on personal incredulity?
how about that the gods couldn't just be made up to explain things, just like all mythology? no, the people couldn't have just made the gods up,
they had to be aliens, because being made up is impossible, even though people still make up stories just like myths from thousands of years ago,
ever heard of animism? people still believe everything has a spirit, or that vampires exist.
no, no it has to be aliens, since humans have no imagination, even though we make up bigfoot, the lochness monster and still have the yeti.
what about all the shows with aliens? star wars, star trek and babylon 5?
did we suddenly grow an imagination in the last 100 years? did we start making up aliens the day before hg wells wrote the war of the worlds?
or is it just AAT is nonsense? that aliens exist but we just shoehorn stories onto old pictures and images to justify more alien visitation since
modern visitation is just not accepted by the majority of humanity?
i think it is the later since most of the leaders in the AAT movement lie, cheat and defraud the people that believe them.
how many times do we need someone to show the rameses/seti image to be photoshopped before people let it go?
or to show the so called "plane" to not be a plane? or show the historic evidence that even up to the 17th century that painters anthropomorphized
the sun and moon? or showed the heavens opening up to beam a light down on saints and mary?
how many times does it need to be shown that many of the so called proofs of space suits are nothing but artistic licence or seeing what the AATist
wants to see?
because no matter what, i've never seen a single shred of evidence AAT folks present that couldn't be put down to either misidentification,
ignorance, or just plain wishful thinking.