It's all in the article. It's not my fault you have selective hearing and tunnel vision. You will never see the big picture because you're like a little child looking at a connect-the-dots and saying.... "Mommy, it's just a bunch of dots....I don't see anything but a bunch of dots....waaaahhhh can i go out and play now?"
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by SimontheMagus
Ah, so you believe in astrology; that could explain a lot.
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by MrWendal
If there were 3-4,000 SEC insider trading files in WTC 7 it is not obvious to me why perps should need to destroy all of them rather than vanishing the pertinent ones. And so far as the paperwork is concerned would perps want those few pertinent files to end up on view like this ?
Have you got anything to support your contention that SEC's back-up was also in WTC 7 ? Doesn't having your back-up in the same building pretty much negate the whole point ?
Originally posted by samkent
And just how do you live your life differently than I do, being as how you believe in some grand conspiracy?
How does knowledge of this grand conspiracy put you a leg up on the rest of us?
Does it get you a bigger house?
Does it allow you to drive a newer Lexus?
Do you earn more than we do?
Has it turned you into a grumpy individual who:
Lives in a shack in the woods.
Doesn’t believe a word on tv, but watches everyday.
Would never take a loan for a better house because money would go to ‘the bankers’.
Building 7 was not too profitable office building at that time. Tenants were moving out and the whole Downtown office business market was harmed with surplus of available space, which lowered leasing prices. This was proved when Building 7 tenants, right after the attacks, relocated themselves with no difficulty to readily available office premises.
I repeat from my previous post "None of the planes went straight to their intended target". Some even flew slightly zig zag then went to their targets. Oh but your "non truther logic" just wont ever get that will you? Yea I know I even wasted my time telling you this. Oh well, someone else will benefit from it.
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
Building 7 had to be destroyed becuause it was from there that the 911 attacks where orchestrated...
Originally posted by JizzyMcButter
the missing 2.3 trillion that rumsfeld announced on 9/10 was already being investigated in WTC7 and the wall of the pentagon that got hit.
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by JizzyMcButter
I know you won’t like this but this link hear makes short work of the missing 2.3 trillion claim.
also it was my understanding that the 2.3 trillion in accounting errors (lets say missing for arguments sake) was being investigated at the pentagon. And surly if it was just to destroy the evidence in that investigation they could have just said that the information was destroyed in the fires, or made a better job of covering up the “missing” 2.3 trillion by not having Rumsfelt announce it (wasn’t the first time it was mentioned though) the day before 9/11. That makes no sense and its not logical.
That's just total crap. Total disinfo at its best. All the records of the missing 2 trillion were destroyed. The pentagon and all the military industrial insiders on the take were covered up with 911. Rumsfeld has never had to say another word about it. Honestly, your either a disinfo agent or a fool without intuitive power. Believe what you want but the truth will be known and it is coming soon in 2012. Hold on to your shorts, brutha.
I want a logical answer.
edit on 14-5-2012 by OtherSideOfTheCoin because: (no reason given)