It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Very Good UFO Sighting From a Plane in Daylight - Oklahoma City, USA - 05/03/2012

page: 6
12
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 15 2012 @ 03:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 




And CGIers would never
be allowed to show an existing ship.


Is that a specific "existing ship" or will any off-world craft work?


Let any CGIer use the Rex Heflin photos for models which was also photographed on
a few other occasions. But why fake even using a genuine ship when the real ships
are seen in random spots by interested uploaders. There is no other use of CGI and the
bashers than to obscure the actual existence of the ships made by the elite hiding the
discoveries of Tesla. Space does have something to grab on to and the Teslaship is the
one and only free energy device that is known and must be obscured by photo expert
banter of anti Tesla agents.

If the elite want to use actual models but I won't hold them back.
So what do you say. Are we going to see actual Teslaship models in fake videos?
ED: The opinion comes from the assumed confidential code of not divulging
any secrets. If a ship is secret the faker can't get the model.


edit on 5/15/2012 by TeslaandLyne because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 15 2012 @ 03:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by ModerateMartian

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Too many videos with the same UFO lately?

A darn shame so continue your dialogue good training beats sociopathic statements
on youtube. The shaking of the UFO does not hurt the crew as how otherwise could
high speed 90 degree turns be made. You never saw one turn well I suggest looking
for information for that and the whole ball of wax where UFOs are concerned with a
Mr. W.R. Lyne knocking down UFO ignorance barriers since 1996 at least.
ED: And a true Teslaship disk ship does exist not that CGI experts would say a peep
about the Rex Heflin flat disk ship even if they knew about UFO Teslaships because
they could not tell you as they would be sworn to secrecy. And CGIers would never
be allowed to show an existing ship.


Would you like to write that in English? I suspect I know what you're trying to write, which would be something along the lines of go back to YouTube with your sociopathic statements, you're not welcome here because we'd rather warble on about our fantasies. Am I right?

edit on 15-5-2012 by ModerateMartian because: (no reason given)


An OP answered me.
Hey thanks after all these years.
You know what I said but keep on holding back.
ED: We all play into the whys and wherefores of the UFO topic.
There is suspect that the UFO topic is spiked by tptb and we play into the
confusion but there may be helpers.

edit on 5/15/2012 by TeslaandLyne because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 03:37 PM
link   
reply to post by mainidh
 


are you joking? even if a real unfaked video was taken of a u.f.o, you'd still get people saying cgi..... or talking to you about odds and what is more likely regardless of any facts.
if something cannot be passed off as space dust or balloons then whether it is real or fake it will always be cgi....

that is not likely to end up with disclosure, it is a lot more likely to end up with people screaming its cgi and complaining it is not in the trash yet and talking about how dumb anyone is who still does not accept it is cgi...

it does not even matter whether this footage is real or not, that is how it works. so to me it is far from disclosure, and reminds me why this whole subject is a waste of time.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 03:38 PM
link   
reply to post by 3danimator
 


Please note all the people that know this upload is fake:


Clicking on the link should bring you to the page with comments.

The best commercial CGI equipment could never beat the government computers.
With the best computers do you still think this video could not be CGI.

Thanks for your consideration.
We might have a new real ship to consider.
Well for outer space or inner space.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 03:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by fatpastyhead
Looks like CGI to me. I'm probably wrong but that is my opinion.

Also, why do these UFO videos all end with the craft speeding off?


Very interesting comment as they go so fast you don't see them speeding off.
That is where the inter dimensional ability excuse is used.
This goes all the way back to Bill Meier videos where saucers jump out of frame.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 04:17 PM
link   
reply to post by groingrinder
 


If thats true then the CIA money would have to be big enough for the effort.
Plainly the uploaders have no interest in the UFO intelligence field and were
handed a line by the CIA there would be licensing agreements along with the
youtube come on of ad money.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 06:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by mainidh
100% REAL.

Won't be long now, they cannot keep lying to us about it with these things happening every day. Disclosuer is coming peoples!!!!!!!!!!




Wow! lol!

Video that's clearly "100% FAKE".. and you call 100% REAL?

Noobs, got to love'em.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 07:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by dsm1664

Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
reply to post by 3danimator
 


Actually sir, you have NOT seen ANY of my work.

Perhaps soon...we'll see.


Your avatar maybe an indication of your CGI skills.

Did you make this UFO clip?


The avatar is a small collection of some early work. mostly expirements that "looked" good at the time.




edit on 15-5-2012 by AnthraAndromda because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 08:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Ben81
 


I call CG on this one. No gravitational lensing effect and the craft is wobbling needlessly.

-rrr



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 08:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Manhater
Boy does that just scream............


CGI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




Looks like it anyway...

Looks like the alien is having trouble man handling it's space craft. lol
edit on 14-5-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)


If the CG didn't give it away the terrible voice acting should have.
edit on 15-5-2012 by DeadSeraph because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 08:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by AnthraAndromda

Originally posted by dsm1664

Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
reply to post by 3danimator
 


Actually sir, you have NOT seen ANY of my work.

Perhaps soon...we'll see.


Your avatar maybe an indication of your CGI skills.

Did you make this UFO clip?


The avatar is a small collection of some early work. mostly expirements that "looked" good at the time.




edit on 15-5-2012 by AnthraAndromda because: (no reason given)


For your sake, I hope your more recent work looks better than your web design.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 12:25 AM
link   
reply to post by Ben81
 
regarding the "shaking, unsteady" UFO: I have been watching these flims for many years. Most daylight, close-up videos show this characteristic "wobble". to me, assuming the UFO's are gravity-powered as I do, it seems absolutely logical these craft would be wobbly in areas of strong gravity, like earth. so, to me, it enhances the credibility. thank you.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 12:32 AM
link   
I'm guessing that everyone here that's saying the OP video is not CGI believes that every single thing they see in every single movie is 100% real too, because, who would really go through all that trouble?

I mean, look at Cloverfield with all the shakey hand-held camera action.
All that must of have be freal, fosho, No CGI at all, for certain. yup.



mmmhmm.
That would make NYC a big conspiracy since it got nuked at the end of the movie, so, we might think there's actually still a NYC but since all the CGI is not CGI, and must be absolutely real, NYC thus cannot exist as evidenced by all the PROOF in Cloverfield.

C'mon.
Are you guys really going to keep believing in CGI?


edit on 16-5-2012 by Druscilla because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 12:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Willease
The CGI video in question is one out of forty posted on his Youtube page, that's hint number one.
All the other people on the plane were...sleeping? Nobody else had a phone with a video camera?


EXACTLY!
edit on 14-5-2012 by ANOMALY502 because: (no reason given)


Yet six pages later, you are the only one who understands my point.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 01:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by DeadSeraph

For your sake, I hope your more recent work looks better than your web design.


lol Last bastion of those who can't. ad hominem.

Seriously, you can do better.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 02:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by AnthraAndromda

Originally posted by DeadSeraph

For your sake, I hope your more recent work looks better than your web design.




Seriously, you can do better.


First piece of truth I've seen you speak on this forum.
edit on 16-5-2012 by DeadSeraph because: (no reason given)

edit on 16-5-2012 by DeadSeraph because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 02:16 AM
link   
reply to post by Willease
 


Tomorrow it will be 12 pages more of useless banter.....
edit on 16-5-2012 by ANOMALY502 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 07:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by dsm1664

Originally posted by newcovenant

Originally posted by dsm1664
As fake as £25 note.

Clearly cgi with fake shake.

I'll have one extra large fake shake to go please. Mmmm yummy.




edit on 14-5-2012 by dsm1664 because: (no reason given)



Prove it.


OK, here you go:

1) Buy Adobe After Effects
2) Follow the tutorials in YouTube to fake a UFO clip using a static background, CGI UFO, generated camera shake, and overlay audio.

Rewatch the movement of the camera shake while focusing on the clouds.




I did not want to know how to make a fake looking video myself. I wanted some proof that this is CGI and I am talking interference in the pix-elation which is the only way to accurately determine this is a forged or created image combined with aerial footage.

Your opinion...expert that it is, doesn't exactly do it for me 100%. Sorry.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 07:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Druscilla
 


You can't just say it is CGI.

If you are a computer expert you should be able to show the break in the pix elation and some insertion technique of the object into the original footage. If you can't analyze the original film and do that - the most you can say is YOU THINK, YOU BELIEVE AND IT IS YOUR OPINION...this is CGI.

You don't know anything for sure.
Back to square one.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 07:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by DeadSeraph

Originally posted by AnthraAndromda

Originally posted by DeadSeraph

For your sake, I hope your more recent work looks better than your web design.




Seriously, you can do better.


First piece of truth I've seen you speak on this forum.
edit on 16-5-2012 by DeadSeraph because: (no reason given)

edit on 16-5-2012 by DeadSeraph because: (no reason given)


And who doesn't love a stalker?



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join