reply to post by swampcricket
It is called an Einstein/Rosen bridge, they have absolutely no known connection to the gravitic monsters known as singularities, much as they have no
known connection to the magnetar, pulsar, gamma ray bursts, supernova or the white or brown dwarfs.
A "wormhole" is a doorway, a singularity, is more like the worlds highest security savings account, all deposits are welcome, but they don't do
If a wormhole and a black hole met, I would imagine that the wormhole, would either act as a door, releasing some of the locked up info contained in
the blackhole, which if true, would be the only known way to retreave info from the singularitiy, besides hawkings radiation of course.
Or, the black hole would simply suck up one end of the wormhole, causing a direct link past the event horizon to the singularity itself, which would
probably just collapse it, instead of making a blackhole with more than one mouth.
You can not take 2 aspects of physics from the same theory, knowing that the same rules that lead to one lead also to the other. Then accept one as
fact " blackholes", but then demand proof of the other" wormholes". You either believe in neither, thus requiring proof of both, or you accept
that the same proven reliable theory that explains the existance of one, also clearly explains the existance of the other. It is like a peanut jelly
sanwich, if you believe the proof that the peanut butter is on the bread, you cannot in the same breath deny the rules of physics that also prove
there is jelly there. Sry if you find one easier to believe than the other, that doesn't change the fact, that by Einsteins General Theory of
Relativity, if one exists, the other must as well. His theory, is that air tight BTW. He proved blackholes and wormholes existed, by proving his
theory correct, in that gravity will warp spacetime, causing light to bend at an exact and measurable rate. Thus proving not only, ralativity to be
true, but also all those far out ideas that are contained therein.