It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by newcovenant
Originally posted by rival
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by FortAnthem
What do these parents have to hide and why make a young child responsible for the information if they do? Either your child can keep a secret or they can't. Many popular children's stories and poems revolve around secrets. I think the parents are afraid the kid is going to spill stuff like my parents are running a meth lab, hoarding guns, making me have sex with strangers - you know that sort of stuff.
It is a ridiculous argument that ONLY criminals covet their privacy. We all covet our privacy,
otherwise the there would be no sound business in window curtain sales.
This argument is nothing but the self-righteous, egotistical assertion of someone who
believes they are squeaky clean and that all others should be as well....and it misses
the point.
Privacy goes WAY BEYOND the hiding of criminal activity. What if the child's secret were
that he was born a boy, but for medical reasons, he was changed at birth to a girl? (I have
niece starting school in this predicament, FYI).
Or that daddy and mommy have an open relationship and that mommy is dating the
principal and daddy is dating the principal's ex-wife.
Arghhh, the idea that criminals are the only ones who require privacy is a RIDICULOUS
ego-driven self-serving fallacy. And it is people who think like this who wake up and find
ALL of their freedom GONE...and sometimes their very lives at stake
Yeah I guess it would be a ridiculous argument if that was what I was saying but I wasn't.
How do you protect children from parents who are abusive if you do not even have the right to ask them to tell you the truth? Before you blame me for an irrational argument why don't you stop and take the time to think of answers that will solve the dilemma of protecting children while maintaining individual liberty and privacy.
Now all of a sudden everyone is a liberal.
Sheesh.
Two timing back stabbers these weekend liberals.
I think the parents are afraid the kid is going to spill stuff like my parents are running a meth lab, hoarding guns, making me have sex with strangers - you know that sort of stuff.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by Furbs
Moving the argument from "If you don't do anything, you shouldn't be worried" to "Don't involve your children in YOUR stupidity" argument is not some refutation of the former, it is a bizarre alliance with that crowd, , and you certainly began this post by making the exact same argument that the "if you don't do anything, you shouldn't be worried" crowd is making. The rest of your post is you scolding parents insisting that if they do things they want kept secret they shouldn't do it around their kids, as if this were the only reason parents would be alarmed that such a question would be asked on a test, because they're acting criminally or unethically, or immorally.
Perhaps you could clarify precisely what you meant by that post.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by Furbs
I am not at all convinced you could dumb down your post. That would require a level that post doesn't seem to be at. The "fundamental difference" between your argument and the other argument both operate on an assumption that the only reason parents would be concerned about this test question is because they are doing something illicit that their children know of and have forced their children into an oath of secrecy. Neither argument acknowledges that a concerned parent might have their concerns rooted in the fact that if that child is aware of private matters such as wealth, family dynamics perfectly lawful, ethical, moral and none of anyone's damned business anyway, charitable donations parents would rather keep anonymous and secret, or any other number of valid reasons to keep a secret. You have only presented a scenario that allows you an opportunity to scold parents for doing things you imagine they're doing simply because of a negative reaction to a question on a test.
I'd like to see you try to dumb an argument like that down. That would be quite a feat.
Originally posted by krazyiven
so no one on here knows what the question was exactly then i take it???
TRENTON — Some New Jersey third graders taking a state examination have been asked to reveal a secret about their lives, according to a report on NJ101.5com.
i'm glad you chuckled but believe it or not, it wasn't meant to be funny ... i am totally serious.
Originally posted by bastet11
Originally posted by Honor93
not only do i agree this is utterly disgusting and poorly disguised for what it is ... but, i would suggest every youngster answer such silly questions with ... secret: my teacher touched me ... and see just how long such inquiries last.
That is so NOT funny, but I laughed out loud!
Originally posted by krazyiven
reply to post by ownbestenemy
Well honestly if people don't know the real question then how would you know exactly if these schools are crossing the borders and looking into privacy issues in peoples homes. Im glad you can be spoon fed information on ads and not ask questions.