It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by jimmyx
every city has beggers on the street asking for money or work, if you can help these few down and out people to achieve some type of normal life in your community, then it would be worth it to try and do the same thing on a much grander scale....
How many of those beggars are actually down and out and how many of them are out there because they want to be?
I moved away from a city where the really needy moved up and on within 4 months time. The vast majority of the beggars were career beggars on a multitude of programs and assistance (quite a few were getting veterans benefits and had nicer clothing, shoes and jewelry than I could ever have and others still actually owned the businesses they were panhandling in front of) and were there day in and day out for decades.
You cant go around assuming every hand out is a hand in need because in my experience the ones actually in need hate being out there and do something rather quickly to fix their situation.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Go back and look at history to see why government needed to step in..
You mean like when the Pharoh needed pyramids built?
Or like when a lesser race needed cleansing?
Or like when non-Christians existing somehow threatened the apocalypse?
Or like when a minority population thought it could just sit at any lunch counter?
Government only exists to march toward totalitarianism. Any semblance of altruism is just tyranny with sugar on top.
Originally posted by Germanicus
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
If people are refusing to be charitable because they are made that the government is taxing them...I really doubt they have it in their heart to start donating to charity just because they have a little extra cash in their pocket.
Exactly.
And like you say. These people should go back and look at why welfare was demanded by the people. And why it was needed. The Government should have a think about that too.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by jimmyx
every city has beggers on the street asking for money or work, if you can help these few down and out people to achieve some type of normal life in your community, then it would be worth it to try and do the same thing on a much grander scale....
How many of those beggars are actually down and out and how many of them are out there because they want to be?
I moved away from a city where the really needy moved up and on within 4 months time. The vast majority of the beggars were career beggars on a multitude of programs and assistance (quite a few were getting veterans benefits and had nicer clothing, shoes and jewelry than I could ever have and others still actually owned the businesses they were panhandling in front of) and were there day in and day out for decades.
You cant go around assuming every hand out is a hand in need because in my experience the ones actually in need hate being out there and do something rather quickly to fix their situation.
every city has beggers on the street asking for money or work
Helping people should be an action derived from good morality of your friends and family, but never forced
Originally posted by Germanicus
reply to post by justwokeup
I do think it is abused and also flawed.
Newt Gingrich's idea of requiring people to train or study while on welfare was great. Im surprised they dont do that now. But jobs must be created for these people. Public works or forcing the corporations to bring back some jobs. But instead you guys demonize cat workers and protesters and workers.
But honestly,you seem to have the most pathetic welfare system in the West. I dont know what you guys complain about. The unemployment benifits are temporary? WTF? What happens to people when unemployment benifits run out? You guys seem psychotic to the poor and needy from the outside looking in.
Technological capacity to produce enough to satisfy everyone's needs already exists globally and has done so for many decades. Yet needs continue to remain unmet on a massive scale. Why? Quite simply because scarcity is a functional requirement of capitalism itself....
Originally posted by justwokeup
Originally posted by Germanicus
reply to post by justwokeup
I do think it is abused and also flawed.
Newt Gingrich's idea of requiring people to train or study while on welfare was great. Im surprised they dont do that now. But jobs must be created for these people. Public works or forcing the corporations to bring back some jobs. But instead you guys demonize cat workers and protesters and workers.
But honestly,you seem to have the most pathetic welfare system in the West. I dont know what you guys complain about. The unemployment benifits are temporary? WTF? What happens to people when unemployment benifits run out? You guys seem psychotic to the poor and needy from the outside looking in.
You appear to think i'm an american. :-)
I'm from the UK. We have multi generational welfare families here.
Originally posted by sageofmonticello
reply to post by jimmyx
I, in fact will say that you are wrong. You admitted it yourself when you said
every city has beggers on the street asking for money or work
If government assistance or as you put it "doing the same thing on a much grander scale" was working, we wouldn't have beggars on the street asking for money or work.
It is obvious that what liberals have tried to ease poverty does not work and has not worked. Perhaps on an individual bases it has helped some people, but obviously the problem has not gone away. Also, of those individuals it has helped, there is no proof that without the government programs existing, that they would of not found a way. Government assistance is the first resort when bad things happen in life, not the last.
Who knows what would of happened to these people had they been able to keep the money they earn, perhaps they would of never fallen on hard times in the first place?
These programs, though made with good intentions, don't ease poverty, they cause poverty. Such as how the minimum wage law doesn't ease poverty but makes unskilled workers unhire-able. Government doesn't solve problems, government causes problems with their interventions.edit on 11-5-2012 by sageofmonticello because: (no reason given)
So please, tell me why government stepping out of the problem, putting many more people into a situation where they need help, is going to cause some charity to magically be able to take care of the problem that they can't take care of right now with government help.
Originally posted by PhysicsAdept
reply to post by jimmyx
Well and I see where you are coming from and I guess I was slightly unclear on what I was really trying to say. I actually am advocate for taxes, as I think they are important for those very things you mentioned. But where the taxes end up going is the problem... Medicaid, SS, welfare, etc are great in concept but not my responsibility. Taxes to pay for social services like police and fire department are great and IMO impossible to live without in a good country--but also spending needs to be purposeful and deliberate. I have no problem in paying taxes for things like what you mentioned.
And in a way, having a fire department is welfare. BUT it also has to do with immediate threats of safety. I don't mind for paying for the fire-fighters to have a job nor the water they use to put out fires, but if someone was dumb and did something almost deliberate to cause a fire, it should come from their paycheck...
AGAIN though, we need to assume that morality problems are being solved or at least fixed to a better spot than it is now...
then you should move to somalia...they have no government...so you would have no more problems, there is your perfect country with no interventions.