It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SOLAR is the way to go and anyone who thinks it is not efficient enough is being fooled by Big Energy.
I don't understand why people here are not trying to figure out how to create a better Solar Cell?
Even something as simple as a form of Mirrored Array that directs Sunlight to a single point where there is a Boiler that gets Super Heated to the point that the Super Heated Steam can turn multiple Trbines at a rate that FAR exceeds normal Hydroelectric Turbines...thus it can produce 1000 Plus Megawatts of power at low constructional costs.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Ok, here's the deal. I recently purchased a whole heap of electronics and magnets and stuff like that so I should have most of the things I need to build some sort of free energy machine. However, I'm not really sure where to start. I need suggestions from you guys. I would prefer to build some sort of over-unity electronic circuit but I'll also try building some magnet-based generators if you have any good suggestions.
It should be clear from my post history (see some of the threads in my signature) that I am not any type of disinfo agent and I am not aiming to discredit anyone. I really want to create a working over-unity device and share my success with the world. I will post clear, detailed, extensive video footage of any devices which I think are working as claimed. I will also let you guys know which devices I think don't work as claimed.
Please try to follow these points when making suggestions:
1) You must have reasonable knowledge that the device does work as claimed
2) You must provide full detailed schematics or instructions for building the device
3) I would prefer to attempt simpler machines rather than large complex machines
What is "FREE ENERGY"?
By Foster Gamble
In an era of oil wars, gas price manipulation, fossil fuel pollution and economic collapse, it’s hard to imagine many more provocative terms than “Free Energy.”
So what does “free energy” mean?
First, like “free air,” it’s available anywhere, for anyone. Energy is endlessly available without burning or exploding anything.
Second, though devices would necessarily cost something to make and to buy, they would make energy access so inexpensive as to dramatically raise the quality of life for everyone.
This area of innovation also uses the terms: breakthrough, advanced, over-unity, innovative, novel, unconventional, revolutionary, outside the box, second-generation, zero-point, vacuum, cold fusion, novel hydrogen, etc. Professionally the field is now most often referred to as the “New Energy” movement. www.newenergymovement.org...
But isn’t a perpetual motion machine impossible?
Of course no machine runs forever, because it is made of matter and all matter wears down. The key is that it is the source of power that is virtually endless.
Originally posted by Druid42
reply to post by SplitInfinity
The problem with harnessing solar is because of clouds. Overcast day, no energy. Magnetism always works.
Originally posted by TWISTEDWORDS
So you want us to create a device for you with design so you can capitalize off of it. That's hilarious...
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by charlyv
Your space example does not take into account the gravitational drag that the entire universe puts on everything, as well as the nearest galaxy, star, planet or moon. It does not take into account the effects of photons moving every which way, cosmic rays, magnetic flux in the space-time continuum or hundreds of other forms of energy and gravity anomolies that can and do produce instability in any and all system.
Gravitational drag of the entire universe?
Please... how much can you stretch this out to fit your perspectives. The forces you talk about are so minutes that they are not even relevant. Photons and radiation can easily be excluded from the experiment if you encapsulate the ball in some sort of thick lead container. And gravity dies off relative to the square of the distance, so it wouldn't take long before the force of such gravity was completely miniscule. Not to mention, gravity only works exerts a force in one direction. It pulls us down to Earth, but there is no horizontal force pulling us to the side, thus one could simply spin the ball in a direction where the force of the Moon or Earth is not acting on it. Furthermore, since this is a purely theoretical experiment, we could simply say lets take it out into the vastness of space where there's virtually nothing around for light years.
You are completely wrong about what you think thermodynamics says about systems like the one we are talking about. It's perfectly possible, because the energy in the system is conserved. Just because something can be in perpetual motion does not mean it can provide free energy. The system I described does not create energy, and if you were to extract energy from the spinning ball it would slow down. In reality, you are correct, it would be virtually impossible to make it work for an infinite amount of time, simply because the Universe is too chaotic. But for all PRACTICAL purposes it can most certainly be considered perpetual motion because the ball will keep spinning for vast amounts of time without needing any extra energy injected into the system.edit on 13-5-2012 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)