I want to build a free energy generator! Suggestions?

page: 19
22
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 15 2012 @ 01:09 PM
link   
reply to post by ChaoticOrder
 


Sorry if the explanation didn't provide extreme detail but providing bits of info lets you create the final product without full blown influence. Its another way for me to help, it keeps the ball in your side of the field.




posted on May, 15 2012 @ 01:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by TrulyGifted
reply to post by libertytoall
 


Lies? For that is only a perception depending on how much your mind has been deceived.
The comment about solving nothing. Seems to me like you arent capable of mentally self gratifying and deny the fact that impossibilities are completely possible just not yet acheiveable, and what makes you so sure that it will solve nothing?


This is laughable.. You cannot convince me that you have broken the law of conservation nor can anyone. Why? Quite simply it can't be broken. With that you will solve nothing.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 02:17 PM
link   
reply to post by libertytoall
 


Well you dont have to break the law of conservation for this device to be valid. Maybe i dont properly understand this law but in my opinion when this law is ignored or in a ways just not applied it doesnt effect the final product. I dont support most physics laws for they blind your mind of whats achieveable. It could also be that you dont understand the device thats being made. For if it is impossible how did I achieve it? You are also denying the possibilities of the device based around a "law" that ties around a "theory" now without anything you previously knew about physics attempt to disprove this theory. Evereything is easier when you remove the "cants" from your thought process and replace them with "cans" positive thinking brings positive results. Also if you take those variables effected by time and utilize them instead of generating waste doesnt that bypass the law from my understanding.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 05:07 PM
link   
reply to post by libertytoall
 


Dude, your totally forgetting that he used a "Tektronix Scope",

This basically means it's been peer reviewed to some of the people here with a lack of technical understanding



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 06:11 PM
link   
reply to post by GhettoRice
 


Hey Mr Funny Man, would you please stop trolling this thread with sarcastic inflammatory posts with the intent of invoking emotional responses. The subject of this thread is how to build an overunity device, it is not about how foolish those who try to build them are.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 06:38 PM
link   
reply to post by ChaoticOrder
 


Not really trolling as I have given a great Technical explanation as to what is going on with his circuit. I do not dispute overunity as a possibility in this world. I do not however believe Steven Jones and his explanation in said videos. I have given to my knowledge accurate information regarding what is at play which is much more than was given in Mr jones talks. I have not received anything more from you than talk about what high level equipment is used without being able to display a knowledge for at least the basic principals at work here.

The lack of input from your side is what seems to be the problem. read your own replies, it's just the same thing (has great scope, explained conclusively). I actually am Interested if you can help me understand what is actually going on contrary to what I have explained before.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 06:42 PM
link   
I'm sorry if i bringforth any criticism im not the most knowledgeable of technological names and breakdowns but the method to my madness is still efficient. have you began development yet? and how small of a device did you want to make? and what will you attempt to power with this device? if i ever ask anything thats to specific theres no need to answer.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 06:47 PM
link   
reply to post by GhettoRice
 



I have given a great Technical explanation as to what is going on with his circuit.

Actually it was explained a lot better several pages ago by someone who clearly understood the circuit much better than you. The way you described it simply looks like you took a few lines from Wikipedia, you strung together a few large words to form a vastly compact explanation of what is actually happening. And for the record, just because you can understand the function of a circuit does not mean you can understand any possible obscure effects that may arise as a result of operating that circuit, unless you claim to know everything there is to know about physics. And I have already explained multiple time what my level of experience with this sort of electronics is, yet you continue to push certain points as if you didn't even read my answers. I'm tired of arguing in circles with you.
edit on 15-5-2012 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 06:56 PM
link   
reply to post by TrulyGifted
 



have you began development yet? and how small of a device did you want to make? and what will you attempt to power with this device? if i ever ask anything thats to specific theres no need to answer.

I assume those are questions directed at me? I have attempted to build the circuit by Steven Jones, but that didn't work out so now I am attempting to build the V-Gate device. As for any other devices I may attempt to build, it would help if they were small enough to lift up and move around easily. And it doesn't matter what I can power, all that matters is that the device can provide more energy out than in.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 06:58 PM
link   
While reading this thread I quickly realize my lack of knowledge when it comes to alternative methods. I enjoy reading all that you have written has provided me with lots of information. A little to complicated for my taste but very intriguing at the least. Thank you for bringing such a topic to the light its what finally motivated me to become a member rather then a viewer.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 07:05 PM
link   
Personally for sake of mobility a properly made magnet powered device would work best. There are many variations of this device that can be made and size of the device can be changed by just changing a few other variables. its simple and efficient to me it is a perfect combo sometimes when making advances you have to minimize the amount of technology.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 07:15 PM
link   
another device thats a good not very mobile and to me less eficient would be an endless dual watermill. im working on one getting there slowly but surely. seems almost "cavemanish" but it is still a free energy device that is a fairly clean method as well.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 07:27 PM
link   
your v-gate device is good just watched the vid. same idea to my invention but a completely different method to having the primary controlling magnet effect the other magnets i use 2 larger magnets in mine 1 for push and 1 for pull seems to get more bang for your buck. now remember that your device needs more force in its spin to become efficient. but im sure you know that.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 08:06 PM
link   
reply to post by ChaoticOrder
 


I may not know everything about electro-magnetism but I do know what's going on in his circuit. I can tell from your rhetoric and lack of response to my actual explanation that you will sidestep any detailed talk about this.

I will gladly bow from this circular debate.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 08:40 PM
link   
reply to post by GhettoRice
 


maybe you should read what the OP stated as well that the circuit didnt work for him and he began working on something else. doesnt it makes sense to work on something your capable of rather then focusing time on something you dont fully capture. I have faith that regardless of the inefficient bashing that you deliver he will accomplish his goal without further input from you.



posted on May, 15 2012 @ 11:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by SplitInfinity
[ The Sun will provide Energy for many Billions of years so as far as Humans are concerned...that is endless.

As far as using an ociillating electronic circuit...for accessing Zero Point Energy...I don't wish to be rude...you really don't know what you are talking about. Zero Point Energy is like piercing the boundries of or Univeres Space/Time Membrane in order to connect to another Divergent Universal State. This take a hell of a lot more than simple frequency manipulation.

The process would have to be able to harness Energy Interconnectivity in another Universal state via One Dimentionality or Singularity. In able to do this you would need to understand the Unified Field Theory which at current Human Brain Development...we are not able to grasp. Split Infinity


WoW SI well spoken.
Yes to get to the threshold of the singularity and crossing it may not be entirely safe.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 01:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Ok, here's the deal. I recently purchased a whole heap of electronics and magnets and stuff like that so I should have most of the things I need to build some sort of free energy machine. However, I'm not really sure where to start. I need suggestions from you guys. I would prefer to build some sort of over-unity electronic circuit but I'll also try building some magnet-based generators if you have any good suggestions.

It should be clear from my post history (see some of the threads in my signature) that I am not any type of disinfo agent and I am not aiming to discredit anyone. I really want to create a working over-unity device and share my success with the world. I will post clear, detailed, extensive video footage of any devices which I think are working as claimed. I will also let you guys know which devices I think don't work as claimed.

Please try to follow these points when making suggestions:

1) You must have reasonable knowledge that the device does work as claimed
2) You must provide full detailed schematics or instructions for building the device
3) I would prefer to attempt simpler machines rather than large complex machines

Fire away.


Option A) Build a HUGE battery at the intersection of two lay-lines (sp?) and figure out how to tune it internally for harmonic resonance.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 08:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Xterrain
 

X....The simple fact is...I don't care what combination or construction or inter-Magnetic Harmonic Frequency that could or can be established...this takes energy to generate energy and the Physical Laws Governing Energy Conservation as well as a simplified term of so much in...never more that that amount out...even using Super Conductivity....you will NEVER be able to Create Energy in abundence of anything Greater than what you are inputing.

It is a Simple Rule of Thermodynamics.

In order to Generate Large Quantities of Viable Energy...you must be able to either Harness existing Energy...ie...the SUN...or create Low Temp. Fusion Generation as even though we can crete Fusion now...and we have several High Temp. Fusion Breeder Reactors...we do not have the ability to create a Containment System that can prevent a Thermonuclear Detonation.

We are no where near in Tech. ability to create a viable Matter/Antimatter Reactor even though we have seen this take place from some Tech. confiscated by some Out of Town friends.

Zero Point Energy Generation is WAY above our abilities so the one true viable way to create an over abundance of Energy is SOLAR. We have very High Tech. Solar Cells that are for Military use. The U.S. Military also has other Powerful High Tech. Energy Generation systems that they are reluctant to release because of their possible Military Apps...so it may take some doing to get this tech. released.

No matter what anyone may think...the U.S. Military is at least a CENTURY in advancement of anyone or any other countries tech....so...it is dicey to say the least.

Split Infinity



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 08:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 

Thank You for the kind words and understanding.

Talking about Zero Point Energy Development and actually DOING IT....are like the distance between going to the Moon or Going to the Nearest Star System. Plus like you have said...the inherent DANGERS of such Tech. are something not to SCREWED AROUND WITH...without proper knowledge of what could happen.
Split Infinity



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 08:25 PM
link   
reply to post by SplitInfinity
 


Not completely true about not being able to create more energy then what is being input. yes you cant create more energy but if the method of input is continual and doesnt lose energy wouldnt anything in excess of that initial amount of energy be more then the energy that is being input? Sorry if im not the most descriptive or knowledgeable but i am still intelligent and if i misunderstood what you were saying please inform me.





new topics
top topics
 
22
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join