Originally posted by AnIntellectualRedneck
Anything that they can do to demonize people who they think are taking their profits. Forget about the crappy economy and that 95% of the stuff they
pump out is pure garbage.
If you were making a product, you'd be pissed too if people were taking your profits.
Plus they aren't even "demonizing" people.
All they're say is a simple matter of fact statement, that's far from demonizing.
Whether you support the law is a different story. What they say is still a fact.
edit on 10-5-2012 by Ghost375 because: (no reason
Pfft, the movie industry is doing better than ever, the Avengers movie is on pace to be the highest grossing movie in history.
And they still say we are hurting their pocketbooks... boo-effin-hoo
Why does anyone have a problem with this? It is all pretty factual. Just because you don't agree with it, doesn't mean it isn't true. If you are
violating these copyrights you are a thief plain and simple.
The problem with the movie industry maybe like this, they assume you and me cannot read or that we should be denied access to information on the basis
it hurts their profits. In the same manner that a person selling a cheap $20 kitchen blender might claim their blender works better than one priced at
$200. But today we can go online and read reviews on IMDB and see.... oh wait a minute that movie they want us to see, it sucks it got a 5.0 or a 2.5
or 6.5 and therefore doesn't deserve any of my life's time. Why would anyone buy a movie that sucks? Why should anyone make anyone buy substandard
movies or substandard health insurance or cars or medical care. That seems to me a great deal closer to fascism and crime on the part of politicians
and industry, shame on them.
Someday we will be able to make a gold bar in to a hamburger or a hamburger into a gold bar with sufficient nano technology, value will have no
meaning anymore, what will they do then, ban technology? Well, when that technology maybe understood by a vast majority of the public as in the case
of networks and communications and computers it maybe akin to trying to suppress people from turning hamburgers into gold, etc. or finding out your
movie sucks. Eventually all matter just will become constituents of anything we want it to become. Making people pay for bad films or bad music or
faulty tires, faulty tvs, health insurance by law or fine, toys painted with lead and other substandard product really seems like a foolish gamble, it
also points out the fraud that a movie, such as the Avengers just broke box office weekend records, which proves my point people will pay for
something if it seems like a good deal, if not a good deal good luck trying to sell it to a multi-tasked ADD culture. Profits still exist, people
still make money and lose it, you get no guarantees Hollywood, no more than a day trader or a bank, well banks seem to defy that but I would argue it
has to do with corruption in politics and business and Hollywood almost crys all too often how they need a piece of the criminal bailouts as the banks
Come on, grow up, you people want a free banking bailout, loans at zero interest and mega mansions and fancy cars, yet almost in a strange way you
want government to guarantee your growth and profits, that no longer sounds like business but crime, the curtain has been pulled away OZ, and you have
been revealed for whom you have become to all, it maybe pretty easy to find out all your profits and "donations" and political fundraisers,
therefore it maybe very easy to find out what you think passes for justice and your rights. In some sense you think of yourselfs as better than the
flyover areas of the country, better than most and more or less elitists. All everyone ever wants from politics maybe just bailouts anymore or returns
on investment, more laws and regulations to protect their "RACKETS". An attempt to get one by the average person, an attempt to get something for
free and claim only others are doing that to you, you're not playing a "RACKET" on anyone. Complicity in wars and defense contracts does not make
one a patriot, complicity in shaping the news media to attack civil liberties and destroy long established rights for all, not just the rich also
makes one a pathetic defender of freedom and the last one to turn to as a beacon of liberty for the rest of the world to gaze upon. Instead we have
crybabies calling for bailouts and guaranteed profits and people being legislated to buy substandard products to facilitate easy living and vast
personal wealth...."money fer nuthin' and your chicks fer free", sounds like a progressive mantra if I ever heard one. Free for me but not for
Of course I think fear is an emotion, and of course the threat of 5 years behind bars is scary. However, I'm not pirating videos, that threat isn't
directed at me. Therefore, that message doesn't really invoke any fear in me or most people who don't pirate videos. And I doubt that message scares
many of the people who do the pirating either.
There was a video of a law professor giving a lecture about how many statutes their are in the US. I tried to find it unsuccessfully. There were
something in the range of 40,000 if I remember correctly.
Basically, it would be impossible for an average person to memorize those 40k laws. And a good chance that almost everyone has broken at least one.
Would you like 40,000 warnings? And if it is not about fear, what is it about? You might not be fearful about being prosecuted for pirating because
you don't do it, but the idea is to instill a sense of fear when you think about whether or not you would.
I remember when they said they were going to protect CD's by embedding some sort of protection that would prevent a CD from being copied.
umm, if I can hear it I can copy it.
Same here... if I don't want that label appearing at the start, I'll get around it. No problems. Even if I have to use camtasia to record the
screen. It's pointless.
And if I do not buy a product that I would not have bought, how the hell is someone LOSING money from me? They're just not getting MY money for
something I am not willing to pay for.. might dent their pocket money so they can't enjoy special caviar on the jet to the bahamas, oh dear...
And if anyone has ever looked at how copyright started in the first place, it was by distributors using others work and then preventing anyone else
The first copyright law was a censorship law. It was not about protecting the rights of authors, or encouraging them to produce new works.
Authors' rights were in little danger in sixteenth-century England, and the recent arrival of the printing press (the world's first copying machine)
was if anything energizing to writers. So energizing, in fact, that the English government grew concerned about too many works being produced, not
too few. The new technology was making seditious reading material widely available for the first time, and the government urgently needed to control
the flood of printed matter, censorship being as legitimate an administrative function then as building roads.
And ultimately, it's not about losing profit at all... it's trying to maintain a futile industry that simply cannot exist in this day and age. Why
are we paying people to hand us bottles of water if it's raining?
To read the true history of copyright is to understand just how completely this reaction plays into the industry's hands. The record companies
don't really care whether they win or lose these lawsuits. In the long run, they don't even expect to eliminate file sharing. What they're fighting
for is much bigger. They're fighting to maintain a state of mind, an attitude toward creative work that says someone ought to own products of the
mind, and control who can copy them. And by positioning the issue as a contest between the Beleaguered Artist, who supposedly needs copyright to pay
the rent, and The Unthinking Masses, who would rather copy a song or a story off the Internet than pay a fair price, the industry has been
astonishingly successful. They have managed to substitute the loaded terms "piracy" and "theft" for the more accurate "copying" — as if
there were no difference between stealing your bicycle (now you have no bicycle) and copying your song (now we both have it). Most importantly,
industry propaganda has made it a commonplace belief that copyright is how most creators earn a living — that without copyright, the engines of
intellectual production would grind to a halt, and artists would have neither means nor motivation to produce new works.
This doesnt really have anything to do with the legal warning the thread started out about but it does have something to do with DHS and ICE domain
seizures and a way to possibly circumvent them with a firefox add on.
MAFIAAFire Redirector 0.9d by MAFIAA Links Un-censor the net and illegally taken down domains.
Torrent Freak May 10, 2012 Homeland Security’s ICE unit is not happy with a Firefox add-on that allows the public to circumvent the domains
seizures carried out during the past several months. In an attempt to correct this ‘vulnerability’ in their anti-piracy strategy, ICE have asked
Mozilla to pull the add-on from their site. Unfortunately for them Mozilla denied the request, arguing that this type of censorship may threaten the
Does anyone else find it disturbing the government (who are supposed to represent and work for the common man) are essentially running around
breaking kneecaps for a conglomerate of motion picture companies? I do.
I certainly do. And what a double standard. I can go to Walmart right now and buy a DVD Recorder. Magnavox DVD Player/Tuner-Free VCR Combo
With that, a DVD player, my computer, and a little time, and skill, that copyrighted DVD could be my own, with my file mane and file extension, and
all copyright stuff stripped off before final recording. You would think if the government really wanted piracy such as this to be illegal, then
government would not allow such equipment to exist, easily purchased by the public.
This is just like the double standard with tobacco. The Government subsidies the tobacco companies to keep them in business, then drills us with
anti-smoking propaganda and self help drugs and therapies.
And I cannot go without naming the biggest hypocrisy of the American government's double standard.
The U.S. federal government spent over $15 billion dollars in 2010 on the War on Drugs, at a rate of about $500 per second.
I am beginning to think that the Double Standard is something everyone agrees too, for some reason. Look at Religion, for example. When it comes to
matters of science, they want undeniable proof to validate the claim. It has to be a "Law" before it can get any recognition. Theories must be below
their standards of quality.
But yet, when it comes to matters of God, they have no problem following "his word" (a heavily altered, many times translated, and edited book) to
the letter. No proof or reason necessary. God said so, so it's must be right. This goes without proof that such a Deity even exists.
In Saudi Arabia if you are caught with a Bible you will be killed. Korans are completely legal in the US to own, and even carry about. And yet, Islam,
in the modern sense, has not killed nearly, in any sense at all, as to close to the number of deaths incurred by both secular and Christian supported
actions, or actions from Nations with Christians.....look at the Iraq War, which has killed over 600,000 people - far far more than any terrorist
could ever hope to accomplish.
Where does it all end? When will Humanity stop practicing the Double Standard, Out of Balance Reality that we are all living in right now?
Sorry, Domo, it was not my meaning to derail your thread, or go off topic. I am just quite passionate about certain things, this being one of them. My
apologies are offered in advance if you feel them necessary. Auto
The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.
All content copyright 2013, The Above Network, LLC.