Astronaut Gordon Cooper's UFO encounter and Government deniability, page 1

reply to post by NotReallyASecret

---

Prove there was government deniability......Or who Gordon Cooper is......Or anything for that matter when you start a thread my friend....

reply to post by NotReallyASecret

---

How can the government identify something that is unidentified? That is a strange question. No they don't have information on things they have not identified, it makes sense. Saying it is unidentified implies that there is no information about it.

This video may shed more light on the OP for people who don't know what he/she is talking about

White House denial

www.huffingtonpost.com...


Gordon Cooper's account is in many UFO documenaries such as Out of the Blue. Here is one youtube vid:

www.youtube.com...

Originally posted by Chrisfishenstein
reply to post by NotReallyASecret

---

Prove there was government deniability......Or who Gordon Cooper is......Or anything for that matter when you start a thread my friend....

I m no american but when you say who Gordon cooper is it sounds strange because i believe he is a Hero over there.He was the last to be launced to space and did solo an orbital mission

reply to post by NotReallyASecret

---

heres a document from national security on their official sight "Communications with Extraterrestrial Intelligence"

www.nsa.gov...

Originally posted by IMSAM

Originally posted by Chrisfishenstein
reply to post by NotReallyASecret

---

Prove there was government deniability......Or who Gordon Cooper is......Or anything for that matter when you start a thread my friend....

I m no american but when you say who Gordon cooper is it sounds strange because i believe he is a Hero over there.He was the last to be launced to space and did solo an orbital mission

edit on 10-5-2012 by IMSAM because: (no reason given)

Sorry but you missed my point....It has nothing to do with me not knowing....I was offering information to the OP that there is something supposed to be added to a thread started, to assist the reader in what you are talking about.......3 lines of text with nothing else is not enough information....

reply to post by TheCh0de

---

That "document" is for a training exercise and does not reflect anything that is real or anything that matters.

Originally posted by NotReallyASecret
Here we have a case where an astronaut encountered a classic disc UFO with landing tripod.

Film and pictures were sent up the chain of command to Washington D.C.

So how can the White House claim it has no info on the subject of UFO's???

I think James Oberg debunked this years ago, but I could be mistaken. He goes by Jim Oberg on this site.

EDIT - Here, look at the Gordon Cooper section of this page.

www.jamesoberg.com...

reply to post by NotReallyASecret

---

No it does not. Lets put this into perspective. The B2 bomber was secret for a long time and when people saw it they thought it was a alien spacecraft. I remember as a kid seeing the thing revealed to the news on national TV. I asked my parents why they would reveal a secret aircraft. The answer is simple, they already have newer ones that they are not telling us about that are in service. The cutting edge of the secret aircraft department is about 50 years ahead of the commercial efforts. Soon however, the newer tech will be revealed. The one in service now is claimed by many to be the TR3-B which supposedly uses electro-gravity tech but I don't have proof of such claims.

Here we have a case where an astronaut encountered a classic disc UFO with landing tripod.

Here we have a case where an astronaut did not encounter anything.
He did not witness it. He was not there. He is repeating what the film crew described. And there is some question about whether the film crew actually described a landing.

As to the accuracy of the rest of Cooper's recollection of the "Edwards UFO", eyewitness Gettys had this to say in 1982: "I am amazed that Gordon Cooper said the object landed -- as far as I know, he never even saw it.... His story sounds kind of funny to me." And Gettys -- who still does not believe the '"weather balloon" explanation -- was there; Cooper, contrary to legend, played no role at all.

www.zipworld.com.au...

Originally posted by BIGPoJo
reply to post by NotReallyASecret

---

No it does not. Lets put this into perspective. The B2 bomber was secret for a long time and when people saw it they thought it was a alien spacecraft. I remember as a kid seeing the thing revealed to the news on national TV. I asked my parents why they would reveal a secret aircraft. The answer is simple, they already have newer ones that they are not telling us about that are in service. The cutting edge of the secret aircraft department is about 50 years ahead of the commercial efforts. Soon however, the newer tech will be revealed. The one in service now is claimed by many to be the TR3-B which supposedly uses electro-gravity tech but I don't have proof of such claims.

Various stealths and advanced human aircraft, are pretty basic rocket propelled machines.

UFO's are something else entirely

Originally posted by Phage

Here we have a case where an astronaut encountered a classic disc UFO with landing tripod.

Here we have a case where an astronaut did not encounter anything.
He did not witness it. He was not there. He is repeating what the film crew described. And there is some question about whether the film crew actually described a landing.

As to the accuracy of the rest of Cooper's recollection of the "Edwards UFO", eyewitness Gettys had this to say in 1982: "I am amazed that Gordon Cooper said the object landed -- as far as I know, he never even saw it.... His story sounds kind of funny to me." And Gettys -- who still does not believe the '"weather balloon" explanation -- was there; Cooper, contrary to legend, played no role at all.

www.zipworld.com.au...

You are right. He may not have witnessed the landing. But he handled the film and photos which he relayed further up the chain of command.

So the government is hiding something..............which is my main point.

reply to post by NotReallyASecret

---

How would you debunk it, since Gordon Cooper has given many interviews on this?

That's not sound logic. I think you're struggling with this thread and your thoughts. Gordon has no evidence to back up his claims on this incident. The onus is on Cooper to provide evidence that this was true; until this can be done, there really is no need to debunk or believe him. I do believe the other airmen who were supposedly with Gordon during this encounter denied this ever took place.

UFO Filmed From Avebury Crop Circle, UK With Multiple Witnesses
  Posted 19 days ago with 89 member flags

The Men In Black(OPs) The Aviary & UFOs
  Posted 12 days ago with 83 member flags

The Mysterious Baltic Sea Object : an Update from Peter Lindberg "Ocean Explorers Team"
  Posted 16 days ago with 41 member flags

Did a RAF Tornado crash during a UFO intercept mission in 1997?
  Posted 14 days ago with 39 member flags

What is this comming out of our star?
  Posted 9 days ago with 33 member flags

Huge Unknown Objects orbiting the Sun for months...?
  Posted 8 days ago with 29 member flags

The CIA and the UFO Mythos
  Posted 16 days ago with 26 member flags

UFO Reporting for the 21st Century!
  Posted 12 days ago with 26 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: