It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Have You Seen the Attention-Grabbing New TIME Cover?

page: 13
31
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 10 2012 @ 11:01 PM
link   
reply to post by antar
 


Mate... my cat drinks cow milk.

So how the "same species milk" theory work out for you?




posted on May, 10 2012 @ 11:03 PM
link   
Geeze, poor boy, he's going to spend too much of his life stuck on women. This is going to create a competition between him and his kids someday


A lot more fun than eating human ice cream in England.

edit on 10-5-2012 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 11:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Flighty
 


I agree that parents that choose to breastfeed their children till the ages of 3 and over should consider the reaction of the general public and I think that it is fair to ask that, at least, a covering be used. If we want acceptance of what we choose to practise then we need to accept what others might feel as well. We can't be righteous about it.

But this needs to be a two way street - if the need arises for a toddler to be breast fed in public without any coverings then we should never be or made to feel ashamed by it.



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 11:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Outofcontrol
reply to post by antar
 


Mate... my cat drinks cow milk.

So how the "same species milk" theory work out for you?


Your cat may like cows milk, but it's not good for it bro. Cats are lactose intolerant and too much can get it sick as.



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 11:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Outofcontrol
reply to post by antar
 


Mate... my cat drinks cow milk.

So how the "same species milk" theory work out for you?


Cats are lactose intolerant

How's that working out for your cat?



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 11:13 PM
link   
Uh, wahst the big deal?
The image is a mental one about the child rearing method idiots!It has nopthing to do with porn.
Some hippie mms i used to know were nursing their kids longer back then and nobodys the worse for it that ive heard ......



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 11:13 PM
link   
Lucky little guy
-second line-



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 11:33 PM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 11:38 PM
link   
Some mind blowing, immature comments on this thread.

When you enter a village and the woman there is breast feeding, would you still have the same reaction? It still happens, and completely natural and totally up to the mother how she raises her child.

Child abuse? What dead set idiot said that?
Half the problem is people not being comfortable in their own skins and they paste that on to every one.
There is no shame in nature, goodness how do you relax enough to have sex?
weird people....!

Don't forget most of you sucked on your Mums boobs too!



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 11:45 PM
link   
reply to post by AnonymousCitizen
 


Considering that mostly lunatics or mentally-littered dregs of society run institutions nowadays, I'm not surprised. I wouldn't be surprised if in the near future graphic sex acts would make front page in such rags.



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 11:49 PM
link   
reply to post by AnonymousCitizen
 


Who are you to say he's too old to breast feed? It's obviously just a shock-effect ploy to get sales. Any publicity is good publicity. That sort of thing.

But on the REAL matter here. Let's get one thing out of the way. I think it's odd for children to breastfeed after about 1 year to 18 months, depending on the child and how advanced they are. Some children breastfeed till they're 3 or 4 years old, and that's fine, too. Some however, breastfeed into their teens. That seems odd to us, me included. But I can understand why. Some parents form different bonds with their children. It's not up to us to judge them, though. Science has proven that there is no harm done in these cases. The child is not being sexually abused or anything ludicrous like that. It's a motherly bond thing. After all, humans are animals and if a mother wants to breastfeed her child for that long, who cares? It's not affecting you, or me. The child isn't rubbing the mother's %#$%# whilst sucking her breast. The mother isn't stroking his #%#$#. Yes it's odd. But it's harmless and it's also none of our business, even if they flash it all over a magazine. The real culprits here are TIME for making this an issue in the first place.



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 11:59 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOriginalJZ
 


you should check out nat geo's taboo. There is a mother that from Australia that breast feeds her kid (hes like 10ish). Its very disturbing.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:01 AM
link   
In some cultures the breasts are not really sexualized objects like here in the US. When I hear stories about six and seven year old kids still feeding off the breast I feel like it is not necessary in terms of nutrition, but here in the US I think a kid is going to be subject to some ridicule if that gets around the school, not to mention all the dirty looks you would get at the park. If a kid whose body doesn't need it gets it, why shouldn't I, at nearly thirty years of age, enjoy myself some fresh from the breast human milk out at the park? Because I am supposed to know better?



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:02 AM
link   

edit on 5-11-12 by paradox because: i made a funny but alcohol amnd ATS dont mix



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:08 AM
link   
reply to post by Bluesma
 


To me it seems like promoting developmental dependency, first on the parents and then on the state. It's early stage conditioning to prep young minds for more intrusive indoctrination in what is laughingly referred to as the education system.

As far as the Time cover, that is just over the top. Maybe they are also promoting the coming "total lack of privacy?"

Cheers - Dave



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:16 AM
link   
I have concluded that most of you have absolutely no clue what it is you want.

Always screaming about too much government.

But when it comes to a mother deciding when it is best to stop breast feeding HER child...you scream WE NEED GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION.

I am laughing at you.

And crying over you.

Peace



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
reply to post by Bluesma
 


To me it seems like promoting developmental dependency, first on the parents and then on the state. It's early stage conditioning to prep young minds for more intrusive indoctrination in what is laughingly referred to as the education system.


That's the issue or possible issue. "freedom means being able to do whatever to your kid". Well not exactly.

Part of being a good parent is separating yourself from your kid to an extent, but still being there. That is not separation.

Carlin talks about how some parents have a child fetish and it not being healthy, this is a probable example.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:37 AM
link   
I feel sorry for the kid when he grows up.
It is in print and on the net... it is forever!
Google his name and up pops this image.
The ridicule he will face, especially in his teen years, will be brutal.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:46 AM
link   
I think it's terrible that a miraculous and natural bodily function has been likened to smut and child abuse.
Yes, I think that child is too old to be breastfed; but I don't see why people regard it as sexual or overly harmful.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 01:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by Horza

Originally posted by Outofcontrol
reply to post by antar
 


Mate... my cat drinks cow milk.

So how the "same species milk" theory work out for you?


Cats are lactose intolerant

How's that working out for your cat?


Pretty good actually... seems like my cat isnt lactose intolerant...



new topics

top topics



 
31
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join