It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gwydionblack
reply to post by jjf3rd77
Instead of preventing things that would go against Obama's "promises" to the people, he has helped Congress to pass things that deliberate spits in the face of some of the promises. Ron Paul, much like he has done in Congress, would be a veto king with these issues.
There will be no "Libertarian Dictatorship". The two words together struggle to not be an oxymoron in and of themselves. Quite simply, there will be very little progress to start and maybe, if the American people LIKE what they see
Originally posted by gwydionblack
reply to post by jjf3rd77
And as for your comment "forcing his vision around the world".
Ron Paul is a non-interventionist. I don't even know where this idea stems from. Reading his book "The Revolution", he states that he doesn't want anything to do with the politics of other nations around the world and he is also not fond of the UN at all.
And once again, the vision is not being "forced" on anyone. You can only open the cage doors for the prisoners. You can't force them to leave. Let them sleep in the cell the rest of their lives with the world in front of them.
Originally posted by gwydionblack
reply to post by jjf3rd77
How is that for getting something done? Already he would have completed more of his promises then Obama. I'm sure he would then be able to, if the Fed has not been abolished by the point, do an executive order to allow competing currencies which will effectively end the Fed's dictatorship over our economy. And last but not least, he can champion Congressional groups behind pushing bills such as CISPA, the NDAA, Obamacare, and the Patriot Acts, to be heard in front of the Supreme Court and be declared for the unconstitutional nature in which they represent.
In terms of your ridiculous statements about corporations being allowed to do "whatever they want", do not fool yourself because you continue to get this wrong. Ron Paul believes in INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM. He, like myself, does not believe that Corporations should be classified as individuals as they are today. Therefore, Corporations will still be subject to regulations - the same regulations that prevented them from destroying the economy from the industrial age and onward. He has never made any statement about deregulating corporations, so wherever you get your BS from, stop trying to pass it off as Ron Paul policy.
People need to be taught new examples and be lead to better morals - they can not be forced to behave..
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
Originally posted by Damrod
No, he does have plans.
Some things will be able to be carried out by executive order and some things will only be possible if he can garner the support of the House and Senate. But he has plans.
Haha I know what his plans are believe you me. How will he effectively gain support of the congress when no one there likes him now? "Without putting them all in a room and telling them you better vote for my ideas or else." As one ATS poster told me he should do. Sure, government is corrupt, but that isn't going to change much. And Ron Paul probably has morals to not do that anyway.
Originally posted by Damrod
Geesh dude....why so much resistance? Do you not understand that many of us that support RP are actually productive business owners but he represents our views of "how things ought to be"? I know the old dude is not perfect...none of us are...if someone was btw...well it would be the second coming and it would be over anyway.
Ron Paul supports freedom and Liberty and damn it...that is what I believe in. He believes people should be allowed to rise or fall based on their own skills and decisions...why is that so bad? If I make a bad call or decision...I don't expect a swarm of Gov agencies to come in and prop me up...why is that such a bad thing?
Ron Paul will never force anyone to do anything...that is NOT Constitutional. For the poster you referenced...he is an idiot...whoever he is...and does not understand what Libertarianism is about. I don't expect anyone to take care of me...except me. I don't expect anyone to give a big dump if I rise and succeed or sink and fail....it is all on me. All I ask for is an environment that allows that to happen....why is that so hard for people to grasp? This is true Libertarianism in action....I am responsible for me....if I fail....I have no one to blame but me....I know the rules, I know the tricks they play...I know the underhandedness of the system....therefore...failure...is completely on my shoulders....
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
Originally posted by CityFarmer
I think the way he's planning to end war and corruption implies some deep changes that he indeed doesn't talk much about. But I think also that Ron Paul voters aren't dumb and know the wind of change involves a short period of troubles. Like all the troops going back home. Who's gonna pay the soldiers if the middle east isn't plundered anymore? There will be job losses but America will restore itself over the long-term.
There has to be a change. Just look how the whole world is going on. Not just America's prosperity. Its freedom should end where other earthlings freedom begins. There's no respect right now, Villainous acts are justified with a great ROI but what about the world misery it brings forth?
True freedom and peace have their price. And I'm all for it.
EDIT: 'Dictatorship' is an exagerated misleading word if you ask me. It sounds more like you just want to darken the picture with subjective terms.
And BTW look at the corrupted governement: how is this not a hidden but proven dictatorship?
There's no charge at all against RP as he hasn't been in the white house yet...edit on 10-5-2012 by CityFarmer because: (no reason given)edit on 10-5-2012 by CityFarmer because: (no reason given)
I'm not charging Ron Paul with anything, I'm just asking how he realistically plans to do it all! Yes, peace and change needs to happen in the world, but what you are insisting is that a President Paul should force his vision around the entire world! Paul's policies will be even more dangerous to other cultures! You talk about implementing your idea of freedom upon everyone, even though they may not want it. That's considered dictatorship!
Big of you to admit, not many Paul supporters would have said that about themselves
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
USA 2012 budget numbers:
total receipts =$2.62 trillion
receipts from personal income tax = $1.14 trillion
ok paul supporters, cut $1.14 trillion from the budget
be specific and don't forget the total consequences of the cuts and describe how it will pass both houses of congress
and this can't be done over a period of years. cut $1.14 trillion NEXT YEAR after Mr. Paul eliminates the income tax
Ending the fed and any other agency completely will be disastrous to the economy.
It's funny, but you keep spreading Ron Paul rhetoric, and yet do not answer my questions at all!
Originally posted by gwydionblack
reply to post by jjf3rd77
Says who? Says you?
I mean it's funny, because the economy was chugging along fine BEFORE the Federal Reserve and as far as the other agencies... how you can link saving money by getting rid of other agencies being "disastrous to the economy" is a pretty damn ridiculous statement.
No. I did answer your questions. You just are refusing to accept my answer because apparently it isn't in line with what you want to hear
I keep asking questions about how Ron Paul will set up such a system that ends corruption in the government completely. And it goes unanswered. I have asked Ron Paul supporters how he realistically plans to end the fed. and all I get is silence, or more claims that he will just do it, and I should vote for him. I also doubted one of the very many points of Ron Paul's plan that I like-- The $1 trillion budget cuts-- and how he could realistically get that to pass congress. No answer.
If we do return to this era of fiscal responsibility, in the 21st century how would that impact all of the corporations big and small businesses alike who currently run on the establishment model? Would that not cause another great depression?
Originally posted by Damrod
reply to post by jjf3rd77
What?...are you candy or what?...."I'm afraid to face the facts"...."My candidate is a jerk-off"....
stop it dude....your dude is a douche-bag....at least RP is real....even more real than Obama...but you are too blind and hard headed to realize that Romney is just a pale skinned version of Obama aren't you....are you scared of the racist card?....I'm not...why?...because it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with right and wrong...and your criminal candidate is wrong and cannot nor will not win....suck it up and realize the fail.....RP is right....if your guy wins...we all fail...for the next seveal years....wake up idjet....get someone who is at least going to start change...your dude is going to perpetuate stupidity and make us all hurt more.....
edit on 5/10/2012 by Damrod because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by KnawLick
People please stop turning Ron Paul into a golden idol to be worshipped. His platform is just follow the Constitution and has nothing to do with him as a person. Those who idolize Ron Paul and not the constitution are no better than those in love college kids for Obama in 2008.
Besides what Ron Paul talks about would NEVER pass congress. Remember that 'ol thing?