It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For the first time, archaeologists have delved into the lives of ancient Biblical kings - exploring a shrine that pre-dates Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem by three or four decades.
It's the first evidence of a Judaic religion in the area at the time of King David - with the inhabitants of the ruins observing a ban on pork and on 'graven images' of animals or humans.
Because these shrines pre-date the construction of Solomon’s temple in Jerusalem by 30 to 40 years, they provide the first physical evidence of a Judaic religion in the time of King David.
Located approximately 18 miles. southwest of Jerusalem in the valley of Elah, Khirbet Qeiyafa was a border city of the Kingdom of Judah opposite the Philistine city of Gath.
The city, which was dated by 10 radiometric measurements (14C) done at Oxford University on burned olive pits, existed for a short period of time between ca. 1020 to 980 BCE, and was violently destroyed.
Daily Mail
The biblical tradition presents the people of Israel as conducting a cult different from all other nations of the ancient Near East by being monotheistic and an-iconic (banning human or animal figures).
The absence of cultic images of humans or animals in the three shrines provides evidence that the inhabitants of the place practiced a different cult than that of the Canaanites or the Philistines, observing a ban on graven images.
The findings at Khirbet Qeiyafa also indicate that an elaborate architectural style had developed as early as the time of King David.
Such construction is typical of royal activities, thus indicating that state formation, the establishment of an elite, social level and urbanism in the region existed in the days of the early kings of Israel.
These finds strengthen the historicity of the biblical tradition and its architectural description of the Palace and Temple of Solomon.
According to Prof. Garfinkel, ‘This is the first time that archaeologists uncovered a fortified city in Judah from the time of King David. Even in Jerusalem we do not have a clear fortified city from his period. Thus, various suggestions that completely deny the biblical tradition regarding King David and argue that he was a mythological figure, or just a leader of a small tribe, are now shown to be wrong
Daily Mail
Originally posted by OffensivAtheist
I only have problems with the miracles, misogyny, brutality & exaggerations in the Bible, not the "History"!
Originally posted by BiggerPicture
the bible is a compilation of how many...
and so who banned pork?
and why do most Christians still eat it?
Originally posted by borntowatch
Originally posted by BiggerPicture
the bible is a compilation of how many...
and so who banned pork?
and why do most Christians still eat it?
Uhm "The bigger picture" is completely lost on you.
I am embarrassed for you by that comment.
I am a Christian and I eat pork, sadly you think I cant. How little and how sad that you are so ignorant.
Originally posted by ollncasino
• Evidence of Biblical king David
• David was 'not a mythological figure'
• Finds 'strengthen the idea of the Bible as history
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by CaptainNemo
looks like a small child made it.
Seems right though.. most religious people have the intellects of children.