It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Let's not go there. Bring a doc on choos or go to medical school.. The way NASA docs run from this, I imagine you'll have finished school, done your residency and returned to debate me as an expert before a current NASA doc does.
OK doc, was it reasonable for USAF General Samuel Philips to write in the May 1969 National Geographic that the Apollo 8 "Astronauts' illnesses", in particular Bormnan's, was not due to INFLUENZA because they were vaccinated, yes or no and why do you agree or disagree with Phillips knowing that physicians then(1969) and physicians today do not agree with the good Dr. Phillips. Doctors then and now do not believe INFULENZA vaccine guarantees immunity and indeed, the performance of the 1969 hong Kong Flu vaccine was surprisingly disappointing.
The poop was a mistake on their part.
Originally posted by decisively
Sorry to bust up Apollo's little party DJW001, but with all due respect, they really do need, NASA does, to trot out a couple of their docs to debate me. We all know it here, as regards the phony Borman cislunar diarrheal illness, Shepard's bogus Meniere's disease cure, Slayton's a-fib issue, no one has ever effectively countered my claims and associated air tight demonstration of Apollo Inauthenticity. And in the world of Apollo, it is indeed I, decisively, and a half dozen friends who are the experts here, experts without peer.
I think that this talk about banning a user extremely off topic, irrelevant (in the thread) and a form of coercion (to the user and the admins) especially since the user has not broken any local dictates.
12e) Compliance With Laws: You agree to comply in all material respects with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations in connection with your activities under the Terms and Conditions of Use (and for members, the Additional Terms and Conditions of Membership).
15). Posting: You will not Post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate.
15a) Offensive Content: You will not Post forum posts, private messages, PODcasts, blog entries, videos, images, and other supported content, links to images or use avatars and/or signatures that are unlawful, harassing, libelous, privacy invading, abusive, threatening, harmful, hateful, vulgar, obscene, and/or disruptive. You will not use text, images, avatars or link to images or domains that contain gore, mutilation, pornography or illegal content. Doing so will result in removal of your Post(s) and immediate termination of your account.
15c.) Intellectual Property: You will not Post any copyrighted material owned by others, material belonging to another person, material previously Posted by you on another website, or link to any copyrighted material without providing proper attribution*, as defined by TAN, to its original source. You will not Post any material that infringes, misappropriates, or violates any patent, trademark, trade secret, or other proprietary rights of TAN or any third party. You will not use your Postings on the Websites to promote your own personal website or any other website with which you may be associated without first receiving permission from TAN.
15f.) Relevant Content: You will not Post messages that are clearly outside of the stated topic of any forums or disrupt a forum by deliberately posting repeated irrelevant messages or copies of identical messages (also known as "flooding").
15h.) Spamming: You will not Post identical content, or snippets of identical content, to multiple threads in the discussion forums. You will also not create more than one thread for your topic, or create multiple "slightly different" threads for a single topic.
15k.) Video links/embeds: You will not embed or Post a link to a video without a reasonable description of its content and why it interests you, is germane to the topics discussed on the Websites or the topic of an existing thread should you post it in a reply to an existing thread.
16) Behavior: You will not behave in an abusive, libelous, defamatory, hateful, intolerant, bigoted and/or racist manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack anyone.
I am a doc remember
I also did not know that pilots turned their heads, turned their eye so that dim light would fall on their more peripheral, and more sensitive, rods.
I am not an ophthalmologist, but am very good with human physiology fundamentals and am quite familiar with what can and cannot be seen under any given circumstances
At any rate, Berry is a big fat quack, that is a FACT indeed indeed indeed.
I began to study Apollo one year ago. ...
That said, my Apollo fraud bread and butter topics, the Borman, Shepard, Slayton scams; I 'ved owned that stuff since I was an intern some 28 years ago.
..I make plenty of mistakes...
..I need to be a little careful...
..some "bad people" from another forum hacked my smart phone...
..I won't do this stuff unless it is worth my time
[or] the risk of wide open exposure
Time's a wasting ....
It is very easy to see apollo is fony bicnarok because they really could never sight stars the way they say they could sight them in the books about apollo and on tv about apollo i know this because i am a sextant expert and won many awards from when i was a little boy on my dads ship and then grew up and won mopre til i decided i did not need to win the trophys any more and so then i read michel ciollins who is very fony with trying to find menkent and cannot even see the constellation centaurus and then i read apollo 14 debriefing where shepard said in section 7.0 that they were never dark adapted on the way to the moon and that they were not sure about sighting with their sextant so you can relax and know it is fake and fony very very much bicnarok and my girlfriend thinks i should go on tour with my sextant in a planetarium to give demonstrations on how neil armstrong must be a liar and he even sold chrysler cars and so how can a real astronaut who says he can sight mekent go and sell chrysler cars after he retires that is stupid and we know apollo trips are very pretend for absolutely sure
Originally posted by Panic2k11
I think that this talk about banning a user extremely off topic, irrelevant (in the thread) and a form of coercion (to the user and the admins) especially since the user has not broken any local dictates