Paul does well in latest primaries: Not

There were three primaries yesterday: North Carolina, West Virginia, and Indiana. Long time Senator Richard Lugar lost his primary after 35 years in the senate. Meanwhile people no longer running did better than Paul, something that is consistent for every state where people can actually vote. Paul earned a grand total of six delegates (same as the dropped out Santorum) while Romney got a total of 66.

Indiana:

Romney: 65%
Paul: 16%
Santorum: 13%
Gingrich: 6%

North Carolina:

Romney: 66%
Paul: 11%
Santorum: 10%
Gingrich: 8%

West Virginia:

Romney: 69%
Santorum: 12%
Paul: 11%
Gingrich: 6%

Further proof that most Americans are Dumb Sheep.
It's a shame.

Originally posted by schuyler
Meanwhile people no longer running did better than Paul,

Meanwhile, Obama was beat in West Virginia by a felon in a West Texas Prison - Source

On top of that, take a look at the states that were voted in. Indiana cannot be determined fully, as there are still delegates to be had.

Do you REALLY think there is a reason for another thread on this?
I mean...this is damn near an exact duplicate...

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
I keep hearing the race isn't over...but then why aren't people interested in the remaining primary contests?

There were three tonight...Romney won overwhelmingly in all of them.

www.cnn.com...

Indiana 99% reporting, Romney projected to win:
Romney - 65%
Paul - 15%
Santorum - 13%
Gingrich - 6%

North Carolina 99% reporting, Romney projected to win:
Romney - 66%
Paul - 11%
Santorum - 10%
Gingrich - 8%

West Virginia 67% reporting, Romney projected to win:
Romney - 70%
Santorum - 12%
Paul - 11%
Gingrich - 6%

Existing Thread

Originally posted by swoopaloop
Further proof that most Americans are Dumb Sheep.
It's a shame.

The thing that makes them "dumb sheep " is the fact that any of them vote at all. It's completely assinine if you ask me.

Same crap every four years. It's the definition of insane.

reply to post by schuyler


Sources? Or those numbers are false...By the way pointless attempt so far...

S&F

Not

reply to post by schuyler


Those numbers reflect the sham voting systems in those states... Look at the crowds he drew, bigger than the vote.

reply to post by freakjive


I was going to make a silly comment about that. If I wanted to read a thread like this I could of just looked at one of Outkasts post....Funny how they use the same numbers for everything they post...I guess in their reality there are not many sheep...

reply to post by KonquestAbySS


Maybe one and the same?

reply to post by schuyler




I just can't understand how people can fall for it over and over.

Romney wins again by a huge margin, and the votes show that Ron Paul is a nobody to the voters, virtually non existant when he ties with someone at the bottom who dropped out of the race.

Proof again that Ron Paul has zero chance of winning the nomination.



S & F

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Romney wins again by a huge margin, and the votes show that Ron Paul is a nobody to the voters, virtually non existant when he ties with someone at the bottom who dropped out of the race.

Proof again that Ron Paul has zero chance of winning the nomination.

S & F

You can get all exited about your man Romney if/when he gets the GOP nomination, but you're gonna be sorely butt-hurt when he loses to Obama by a landslide, because he's not nearly as liked as you think he is. DEAD people in primary states don't count, remember?


EDIT TO ADD: Oh and if by some miracle he wins the presidential nomination, expect riots because no-one will know ANYONE who supports the man, other than the media.

reply to post by freakjive

Meanwhile, Obama was beat in West Virginia by a felon in a West Texas Prison

He wasn't beat

Get your attacks straight.

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by freakjive

 

Meanwhile, Obama was beat in West Virginia by a felon in a West Texas Prison

He wasn't beat

Get your attacks straight.

Talk to MSNBC (a left-wing news source no less)

reply to post by freakjive


I don't care who reports it...40% is not larger than 60%....ever.


But you can be dishonest with yourself if you'd like and claim 40% is more than 60%.


I guess being a Ron Paul supporter, you commonly think that the candidate that gets the least support is winning

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by freakjive

 

I don't care who reports it...40% is not larger than 60%....ever.

I just reported the link as I read it. (Funny ass news no matter how you look at it)

Clarification: Felon wins 10 counties in W. Virginia - Source

Now what does that say about your boy, Obama?
He's getting beat by an absentee felon that nobody has heard of. (until today)

I guess for some it really is...

Anybody but Obama

Originally posted by freakjive

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by freakjive

 

I don't care who reports it...40% is not larger than 60%....ever.

I just reported the link as I read it. (Funny ass news no matter how you look at it)

Clarification: Felon wins 10 counties in W. Virginia - Source

Now what does that say about your boy, Obama?
He's getting beat by an absentee felon that nobody has heard of. (until today)

I guess for some it really is...

Anybody but Obama

edit on 5/9/2012 by freakjive because: (no reason given)

edit on 5/9/2012 by freakjive because: (no reason given)

It says he is going to lose West Virginia by double digits just like he did in 2008.

West Virginia really isn't a concern for Obama.

You should advance yourself in the way it works.....Votes!! hahahhahahahaa

Originally posted by freakjive
He's getting beat by an absentee felon that nobody has heard of. (until today)

Yea I know it's a shame hes getting beat, I thought he looked like a stand up guy despite the jumpsuit.