Why can't I watch/get a copy of Princess Diana conspiracy documentary "Unlawfull Killing" anywher

page: 1
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 8 2012 @ 08:04 AM
link   
ETA: Slightly confused now. I read several times that it was out but now am seeing that it is still coming soon. Perhaps it got recalled before release.



I watched the first 6 minutes of this documentary on Youtube and was very intrigued. I went on to see if I could buy the DVD online. I knew it was banned in the UK but I figured I'd be able to import it easily. No such luck. I actually can't even find a single site that sells this DVD.

So then I went to look to see if I could watch it online. Again, no such luck. Plenty of links but no full movie at all.

I appreciate it's very controversial but why can't I even buy a copy? This seems very odd to me, especially in this day and age where you can't so much as keep a family photo off of the internet. If anyone knows how I can get a copy or watch it online please DM me.

Here's the start of the documentary:



edit on 8-5-2012 by Scope and a Beam because: (no reason given)


What Wikipedia has to say about Unlawful Killing


Unlawful Killing is a British documentary film, directed by Keith Allen, about the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed on 31 August 1997. It has been financed by Mohamed Al-Fayed and Associated-Rediffusion [1][2] and premiered at the 2011 Cannes Film Festival.[3] It argues that the British and French authorities have covered up uncomfortable facts about the crash, accuses Queen Elizabeth and Princess Margaret of being 'gangsters in tiaras', and alleges that Prince Philip has a 'Nazi background'.[4][5] It is claimed that the film would need 87 cuts to be screened in the United Kingdom, for which it is therefore not scheduled to be released.[2] However, the director believes that it will make money in America, where conspiracy theories about the Princess of Wales' death remain popular.[5]

edit on 8-5-2012 by Scope and a Beam because: (no reason given)
edit on 8-5-2012 by Scope and a Beam because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 8 2012 @ 08:14 AM
link   
What is the general thrust of the film what makes you think its banned in the uk?



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 08:15 AM
link   
Is this the one?



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 08:20 AM
link   
reply to post by dashdespatch
 


Sorry I should have explained further.

It basically looks into the details of her death with the premise that it was in fact an assassination plot hatched by the Royal Family because Diana was pregnant with what would become a Muslim child. A big no, no in the Nazi affiliated Royal Family of England.

It was banned officially. I think because it features a shot of Diana dying. Here's reputable link on the banning story www.independent.co.uk... ml



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 08:30 AM
link   
Hmm.. i cant find this vid anywhere so far.
edit on 8-5-2012 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 08:31 AM
link   
reply to post by Neysa
 


Yes that's the one.



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 08:42 AM
link   
aparently you will be able to get it from the states via amazon

www.amazon.com...=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1336484403&sr=8-1



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 08:50 AM
link   
Edge media did a good interview with a guy regarding the killing of diana and explained about the "boston breaks". she was definately murdered, but this is not suprising. When we look back at the royals history, throughout thier history they have been killing and torturing many, many people. What makes people think that is not going on tioday. We just dont get to hear about it becuase its carried out by MI6 and such like.



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 08:59 AM
link   
reply to post by TheMindWar
 


I also fully believe she was murdered. She even predicted it about 6 months before she died in a letter. The Royal Family have links to the SS and I very much doubt the murderous ideology of such an organisation hasn't influenced minds somewhere along the line in their case.
edit on 8-5-2012 by Scope and a Beam because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 08:59 AM
link   
I did a quick google search, I thought maybe your search was skewed if you are in the U.K. All of the links are from May of last year, even the official website has nothing about a dvd release, which I found rather odd. There is a facebook group that looks to be put up by the producers(?) and there are a number of people asking about where to get the film, no replies that I could see from the administrators of the group. Kind of looks like this film is being pushed underground.



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 09:00 AM
link   
reply to post by dashdespatch
 


Look great. I hope it does materialise. Would I be able to watch the DVD in a UK player though? Or would it definitely work on a PC?
edit on 8-5-2012 by Scope and a Beam because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 09:02 AM
link   
Here is an article in the Guardian written by Keith Allen (The Director of the Film) as to why it will be seen everywhere but in the UK

Linky



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 09:13 AM
link   
I looked here ?

www.imdb.com...



Having a good hunt myself now for this !



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 09:15 AM
link   
Here's a different doc

www.youtube.com...




posted on May, 8 2012 @ 09:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Scope and a Beam
 


You would need a region free dvd player to play it on your tv. Aparently dvd rom drives have been region specific since the year 2000 (although there is some software out there that can convert ntsc to pal)



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 09:48 AM
link   
reply to post by Truth_Hz
 


Thanks a lot. Strange I searched Unlawful Killin + The Guardian remembering this article vaguely and found nothing.



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 10:19 AM
link   
Interesting one here too !





Not given up searching yet will get back if found !


Peace



posted on Jul, 26 2012 @ 07:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by IpsissimusMagus
Here's a different doc

www.youtube.com...



I just watched the 4 hour film on Lady Die above by Chris Everard, and wow, I learned a few things I didn't know before:

- When the ambulance reached Princess Diana and put her inside, it took about 90 minutes to get to the hospital which was only 3 miles away! Chris Everard drove from that tunnel to the hospital in the film and showed that even if you drove at 30mph, you would have only needed 11 minutes to get to the hospital. So the fact that the ambulance took 90 minutes is extremely suspicious. It's obvious that something sinister was going on in that ambulance (such as them finishing her off and completing their Illuminati occult sacrifice ritual?). It would have had to be moving at 2 mph to move 3 miles in 90 minutes! That stinks to high heaven! How do the propagandists who say that it was just a simple drunk driving accident explain that?

- The mercedes that Diana crashed in was stolen a few weeks prior, and then found by the police. When it was found, nothing in it was missing except for a microchip that controlled the navigation device. Obviously, it was rigged with something when it was returned, probably some kind of remote control steering device.

- The intelligence agents would not let engineers from Mercedes company inspect or examine the crashed vehicle for some reason. Obviously, because they would have discovered that it was rigged and tampered with?

- The cameras in the tunnel where Diana died were turned off and were the only ones in Paris that were turned off that night. They are usually on though. No one can explain why they were off. Gee what a coincidence.

- The driver Henri Paul had carbon monoxide in his blood, which could not have come from cigarettes. Obviously, he was incapacitated somehow.

- The body guard who survived the crash doesn't remember what happened (how convenient), but he says that if the driver Henri Paul had been drunk, that he would never have let him drive the car.

- Diana wrote a note saying that her life was in danger and that they were planning a car accident for her. You can see it here:

www.conspirazzi.com...

Obviously, something stinks to high heaven. There's no question it was an assassination and conspiracy.

Gee, I wonder what the pseudoskeptics will say about all this? I don't get why they believe that conspiracies and cover ups and assassinations by the elite don't exist? What is their basis? Why do they believe that the official version of everything must be the only truth? What if I had a pseudoskeptic killed and made it look like a suicide or accident? Would that mean that it really was a suicide or accident, because it looks that way?

After all, in their book, there's no such thing as a cover up or suppression of evidence. Every official story and every cover story must be true in their book. To them, authority/establishment = truth. Totally illogical. Spock or Data would never agree with that. So why do pseudoskeptics call themselves "rational", when Spock or Data or the Vulcan race would never agree with them or find their beliefs to be logical? I don't get it.

All they do is lie and yell "there's no evidence" over and over again, no matter how much evidence exists. Are these pseudoskeptics shills and disinfo agents who are lying deliberately? What is their incentive to protect the establishment, unless they are paid by them?

edit on 26-7-2012 by WWu777 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2012 @ 09:44 AM
link   
reply to post by Scope and a Beam
 


admin note:
Links removed per copyright holder's request, DO NOT post links to pirated content on ATS
edit on 12-14-2012 by Springer because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2012 @ 11:22 AM
link   
The answer to the OP question is because the production company and distributor have not released the film yet.

Springer...





new topics
top topics
 
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join