Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by CrimsonKapital
OH MAN! Canada, New Zealand and the U.K.? Are you trying to be funny?
First of all...Canada is the 51st State. Canada and the United States are literally one in the same and when Russian Military Threat Accessments come
out they always say Threat Accessment NORTH AMERICA as the U.S. and Canada are both part of NORAD...and there are huge numbers of Joint Canadian/U.S.
bases ALL OVER CANADA AND ALASKA.
An attack on Canada is the same as an attack on Mainland United States.
Secondly...N.Z. and U.K. are both protected by the U.S. We even suppy the U.K. with our Trident II D-5 Nuclear Mirved Sub Launched Missles. The most
accurate and leathal Sub Launched Missles in the World. The U.K. is host to a Multitude of U.S. Military Bases as well as being protected under the
USN. ABM Net.
If you put together all three of these countries capabilities without U.S. Bases or U.S. equipment...you would have....Australia. Split Infinity
While Canada and America are quite close, you can never be as close to them as Australia or the UK. Why? Because they are in the Commonwealth, America
Just because you provide the UK with weapons doesn't mean you own them militarily speaking, you supplied the Muhjahadeen in Afghanistan to fight the
Russians now they are fighting YOU with the weapons you gave them!!!
Australia is already in the process of constructing 12 new submarines as well as over 60 new fighter aircraft, my government is also looking at
purchasing a air-fleet carrier.
But you still think the commonwealth has no military???
The Commonwealth armies are more highly trained than those of america, who only pumps out soldiers after completing a 2 week training camp. Thats why
your casualties are so high in every war, because your soldiers are of poor quality.
The Commonwealth won victory in the Indonesian Confrontation, the Indo/Malaysian Crisis, and the Falklands war.
Whereas America loses Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, and so on. Yet you call our military non-existant?