It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why is one world government a problem?

page: 4
3
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 26 2012 @ 06:40 PM
link   
reply to post by DannL
 


LOL, and if there happens to be people living on that resource, well, we will forcibly relocate them as well.

and those who dont want this type of organization? Relocation. But to where? And how will we justify moving them?

WELL, we will have to put them to work.

its for the greater good!

You are parroting typical higher education rhetoric. Im sure that this place you describe will be a place of guaranteed employment for you.

You are very foolish to believe that this has not been tried before.

Come to think of it, if it has been tried before, and it works--WHY ISNT IT HERE,NOW?
edit on 26-5-2012 by rainbowbear because: you know how it is




posted on May, 26 2012 @ 07:05 PM
link   
The reason it didn't work before is because the rest of the world stepped in as they deemed it inappropriate political behavior and atrocities to civil rights. Russia had about 70 years of utopian idealism with virtually no crime. When the Iron Curtain fell crime flourished once again. I'm pretty sure a good amount of the Russian population wouldn't mind going back.

I will say that by the end of the USSR regime, the leaders had become corrupt. But that's only because that was the way of the world back then and is now. Countries, borders, and differences. This all leads to agendas of giving up and cashing in, or imperialism leading to war, or whatever they're reasons were. That then lead to revolts. Plus they weren't that smart back then in regards to societal psychology and anything to do with sustainability.

When there is only 1 communist world government in the world not much can go wrong. Alternate agendas wouldn't make sense because that government already owns everything. Imperialism wouldn't mean war and death. It would mean outer freaking space. Sure it would take a LONG time, but we'll NEVER colonize outside of Earth with today's society. It takes ultimate unity. If we all live for ourselves forever, human history will never make it in the record books of civilization.

Right now it's a theoretical world to us. We can't say for sure that communism wouldn't work in a world with only one government. Surrounding external forces lead to corruption. With an NWO it's just you and limitless possibilities.
edit on 26-5-2012 by DannL because: (no reason given)

edit on 26-5-2012 by DannL because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2012 @ 01:00 AM
link   
reply to post by DannL
 


While it is well document that there was a rise in reported crime in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union, my definition of Utopia would not include gulags or capital punishment.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 01:48 PM
link   
Because if we have a king of the world and that king happens to be corrupt, we're all going to the concentration camps...




top topics
 
3
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join