reply to post by DakotaCensus
The problem is not about having a one world government, the problem is that a certain malevolent group is trying to make it happen. The reason we know
this is because many prominent people have tried to warn us about it, for example:
Eisenhower said in his final speech as President: "We face a hostile ideology -- global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and
insidious in method. Unhappily the danger is poses promises to be of indefinite duration".
John F. Kennedy said, "For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its
sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by
night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly
efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not
published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no
secret is revealed."
Winston Churchill warned in an article published in the February 8, 1920, issue of the London Illustrated Sunday Herald that: Bolshevism is a
"worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious
malevolence, and impossible equality..."
David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January 1918 dispatch to Washington: "The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are
Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a
worldwide social revolution."
Then there are the "Georgia Guidestones" written in eight different languages, which are strange, not only in what they say, but also because the
owners have never been revealed. The stones say:
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.
All of this corresponds directly with the "Protocols of Zion" which also talks of drastically reducing the population and of "social duty" over
individual rights, i.e., Collectivism.
A one world government is certainly not desirable for us if there is the slightest chance that it will lead to despotism and a world where "our
kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out
any(one) who oppose us by deed or word."