It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Reality" is a conspiracy

page: 1
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 7 2012 @ 04:50 PM
link   
This is a highly-detailed and thorough thread spanning many different subjects. It will take a short amount of time to finish my edit of this post, but bare with me.
edit on 7-5-2012 by SonofLeod because: (no reason given)


Reality is not as most perceive. Most think that their reality consists of working or school from 9-5, slaving their lives away. We as Terrans, have been manipulated by the "Elites", all of our lives. You may call them by any names that you wish: Illuminati, The Powers That Be, Freemasons, Fallen Angels, Satan, Demons, etc. The simple truth is that they exist, fighting over inconsequential matters such as their label, is detrimental to the truth itself.

These beings have existed since the creation of the human race. Now this thread will start the tale of Conspiracy here. There have been many different works of literature detailing the creation of humanity, or the concept known as God. I will start with the Bible, while all man-made religions are hoaxes perpetuated on mankind to dis-empower them, there is yet a core of truth in it. This extends to all religions when read with the eye and not the eyes.

Genesis 1:26 " And God said, "Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness." The original Hebrew term was Elohim, which implies plurality to the singular God. If God was all that existed, who would he be talking to, or why would he be talking to himself? Now, this is where many biblical scholars insist that it's because of the Holy Trinity: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. There is nothing "Christian" about the Trinity. It is a pagan concept, and has no place in the religion of a monotheistic god. The Holy Trinity is a myth perpetuated by the Catholic Church. The only reason the plural terms would be used is if in fact their were multiple entities present. So this simple statement gives us the proof of there not just being one singular "God" in Christianity.

Genesis 2:5 "And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground." This refers to the creation of man and his purpose. Tilling the ground is a reference to work, via digging etc. Now this is where Mr. Zecharia Sitchin comes in. I know some readers may be familiar with his work, while others may not. He is the proponent of a theory that beings from another planet came to earth in the past and created humanity as slaves to mine gold. Nibiru/Planet X, the course of the planet is all irrelevant to this. Labels mean nothing. The universe is infinite and does not have an end. It encompasses all and is present in everything. If there is one sure fact in this world, that is mathematics. Mathematics never lie. In a infinite universe and possibly multi-verse, the odds of only one planet sustaining intelligent and human life is non-existent. In terms of statistics it would be relative to 1 in infinity. It is simply not true. Whether any of you have seen aliens, is also irrelevant. That which you do not see is not proof of that which is not there. Can you see oxygen, or electrons, protons, atoms, or even bacteria with your eyes? No, but you know they are still there.

The first recorded civilization in the world is of ancient Sumer. This was a civilization that popped up around 5000-6000 years ago. Sumer is now known as Iraq coming from the Sumerian city-state Uruk. Genesis 2:8 " And the Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed." The term Edin is a Sumerian word meaning plain. Maybe this is convincing enough, but lets go further. We are given the names of 4 rivers that ran through the Garden of Eden. Genesis 2:11 "The name of the first is Pison; that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah where there is Gold." Note that this first line is very important in Mr. Sitchin's argument for the beings that created us as slaves to mine gold, which correlates to the bibles need for Adam to till the land. Genesis 2:14 "And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates. Hiddekel is the Hebrew word for the Tigris river.

The Tigris and Euphrates rivers are the two main rivers that pass through the land of Sumer, or Iraq. This gives potential for speculation and proof of Iraq being home to the Garden of Eden. The prophet Abram, also known as Abraham, was from the Sumerian city-state of Erech/Uruk/Iraq. God created two trees in Eden, be aware that these references to trees are symbolic and metaphorical. Genesis 2:16-17 " And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, tho shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely tie. Polarity or Duality, is the essence of Good and Evil, Yin and Yang. Duality is brought forth into reality by the Pineal Gland in your brain. Now before you go "Oh no not some new age mumbo jumbo", just stick with me.

Genesis 3:4-5 " And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall surely not die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil." The serpent is a millenia old symbol of wisdom. Evidence by the Rod of Asclepius and the Caduceus, as well as many influences of the Kundalini meditation and etc. The verse above though is a mistranslation from the original Hebrew text. The serpent didn't say their eyes would be open, he said their eye would be opened. The Pineal Gland is the only other part of your body that has rods and cones just like your eyes. This is also where the sleep hormone Melatonin is created, and controls your dreams. This is literally where you "see" the dreams, when you are sleeping. Don't forget this just yet, we will come back to it.

So in the Garden of Eden, God told Adam and Eve that they could live forever and be safe from the dangers of the world, if they followed his rules, and didn't eat of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Why would a compassionate, loving, peaceful God suppress knowledge? Because he is looking out for our best interests? The act of withholding information is inherently evil, and besides why should learning be a sin? These are all traits of somebody with inherently evil intentions. So here are the comparisons: Annunaki created Adamu to mine gold and precious other metals, God created Adam to till the land. Annunaki wanted to keep humanity as slaves, God wants to keep Adam dependent upon him and following his rules. The Annunaki were the Sumerian pantheon, Elohim is a plural hebrew word meaning Gods. Elohim created Adam to till the land, and they created the Garden of Eden in Sumer.

Now part of Mr. Sitchin's theory is that an alien geneticist part of the Sumerian pantheon, named Enki, created mankind at the behest of the Annunaki council to quell the rebellion of their own workers. Enki took pride in his creation, and never meant for them to be slaves. Enki had a brother named Enlil, that wanted to keep the creations as slaves. Enki is meant to represent the Serpent in the Garden of Eden, and Enlil is meant to represent Yahweh, or God. When Enlil refused to let them free, Enki was said to have devised his own means of setting them free. The spin of this being that the person most think of as being God in the Bible is really the Devil figure, and the being branded as the Devil is really God. He was trying to teach the importance of your third eye because then you become all knowing like the Gods, and learn the truth. That we are all Gods and Goddesses manifested at the conscious will of the one true prime creator, the Universe. The Pineal Gland is the connection. We are all drops in the ocean of thought, and the ocean of thought is in every thought. This is why Yahweh/Enlil/TPTB tried to keep us away from our Pineal Gland and still does...

Genesis 32:30 "And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved." The Pineal Gland in your brain is surrounded by the blood-brain barrier fluid on all sides making it like an island. Even the spelling is nearly identical Peniel/Pineal. Matthew 6:22 "The Light of the Body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light." This verse says eye, not eyes. Is this not what the symbol of wisdom attempted to teach in the earlier passage of Genesis? Why would Jesus be saying this? Jesus was not the Son of God, he was simply an ascended being much like Buddha, Krishna, Thoth, Hermes, or any before him. There are tales of Esau spending time in India, where it is very possible he learned these things. There is a highly-speculative theory that Esau/Jesus was the reincarnation of the being known as Enki/Satan in the previous verses, but I won't just touch on that yet for fear of some losing interest.

Hosea 4:6 " My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Now why would the being Yahweh who is supposed to be God, scold his children for lack of knowledge when he was the original one who withheld knowledge from them in the Garden of Eden. There is a total and complete polar difference in the God of the Old Testament, and the God of the New Testament. John 1:18 "No man hath seen God at any time." Yet this is in direct contradiction of Genesis 32:30 and Exodus 33:11 " And the Lord spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend."

Now lets fast-forward to the England, 1066. The people of England held Allodial title to their land which meant nobody, not even the King could take their land for not paying a tithe/tax. Now in 1199, enter King John Lackland Plantagene. He invoked the Law of Mortmain, which was that nobody may pass their land onto the Church or anyone else without the King's approval. The Vatican was not happy about this because King John and England owed a lot of money to them. King John refused the Vatican's representative Stephen Langton, who was chosen by Pope Innocent III to rule England. In 1208, England was placed on Papal interdict meaning probation. King John was excommunicated and in trying to regain his stature he groveled before the Pope. He returned the title to his kingdoms of England and Ireland to the Pope as vassals, and swore submission and loyalty to him. King John accepted Langton as Archbishop of Canterbury, and offered the Pope a vassal's bond of fealty and homage. Two months later, in July of 1213, King John was absolved of excommunication, at Winchester, by the returned Archbishop of Canterbury, Langton. On October 3, 1213, by treaty, King John ratified his surrender of his kingdoms to the Pope, as Vicar of Christ who claimed ownership of everything and everyone on earth as tradition.

Where in the Bible did Jesus give any man this kind of power over all men and land? He didn't. Nor did he create a religion or the office of Pope. Can you have a third party break a contract between you and another person under duress..? Don't those of you who are forced into a contract reserve all your rights under modern UCC 1-207 and claim UCC 1-103? The contract (treaty of 1213) was between two parties. Now the Barons of England would not put up with being slaves anymore so they took to the sword and made King John sign the Magna Carta. So doesn't this act of the Barons violate the principle of natural law, when they created the Magna Charta, as having no force and effect upon a contract between two parties? Well Pope Innocent III, the other contracting party thought so, for he declared the Magna Carta to be: ". . .unlawful and unjust as it is base and shameful. . . whereby the Apostolic See is brought into contempt, the Royal Prerogative diminished, the English outraged, and the whole enterprise of the Crusade greatly imperiled." Quoted from G.R.C. Davis: Magna Charta. Trustee of the British Museum. London. 1965.

What this means is, despite what most think the Treaty of 1213 is still valid. The Treaty of 1213 created a contract, not a trust. A contract may not be broken by a 3rd party, such as the Barons in this case. Now this means because the Magna Carta did not fly, when British immigrants colonized America, America is considered the Pope's land. How? Via the Treaty of 1213, all of the King's lands are the Pope's, and he and his subjects are vassals of the Pope. Now here is where it gets interesting. www.youtube.com... It has been proven that All U.S. Presidents are direct descendants of this very same King John Plantagene. What are the odds?

Now everybody is aware of the Corprations and relationship to the Banks. They control our Education, Science, Media, Health Care, Food and Liquid Industry, Religions and etc. The concern I bring up now and the connection to everything. Sodium Fluoride in our water accumulates in the Pineal Gland more than any other part of your body. It damages this gland and stops it from working to manifest your reality as you see fit, and your ability to visualize. This is why drugs like Marijuana and Dimethyltryptamine are illegal because they stimulate this gland and how it works, evidenced by OOBE's and altered states of consciousness. They are suppressing us. This is the reason for government benefits and stripping of our freedoms for security. We have to want this with our own free will, which we do by buying their products and electing their politicians. The whole plan of the New World Order is to finally re-establish us as their slaves like they did so many years ago. Our governments suppression of knowledge and freedoms is so unsimilar to Gods actions in Eden.
edit on 7-5-2012 by SonofLeod because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-5-2012 by SonofLeod because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-5-2012 by SonofLeod because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 7 2012 @ 04:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by SonofLeod






Wow...you're pretty sure of yourself.


Create a thread and just give it a title, and NOTHING more..?!


Bold man, bold...





posted on May, 7 2012 @ 04:56 PM
link   
reply to post by SonofLeod
 


Yes, I agree, especially with what you said about the midgets. It's a shame.

Imagine what could be if Voltron hadn't used his shoulder missiles



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 04:57 PM
link   
reply to post by facelift
 


What are you talking about?

On topic please.



Btw, sorry OP, after 5 mins I thought this was going to be it.
edit on 7-5-2012 by RandomEsotericScreenname because: (no reason given)


25 mins and counting......the conspiracy is so big, OP had to be silenced.
edit on 7-5-2012 by RandomEsotericScreenname because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 04:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by RandomEsotericScreenname
reply to post by SonofLeod
 


Yes, I agree, especially with what you said about the midgets. It's a shame.

Imagine what could be if Voltron hadn't used his shoulder missiles



Now wait a minute...let's not be too quick to agree.


What if the OP was wrong about adding an extra egg to the cupcake mix..?





posted on May, 7 2012 @ 05:10 PM
link   
It seems that the OP couldn't wait until after typing all of the post in order to actually post the thread.

Moot point, really...it's not like we can respond to anything until after the content has been updated...

Smooth thinking, OP. Now you got us hooked...not.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 05:49 PM
link   
The mods must have seen the content, and sent the MIB's in after him.

GEL? Was that you again?



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 05:49 PM
link   
reply to post by Starchild23
 


It was an accident. I hit enter thinking it would take me from title to subject, and instead it submitted the thread. Couldn't figure out how to delete so trying to edit it in time.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 05:55 PM
link   

Why would a compassionate, loving, peaceful God suppress knowledge? Because he is looking out for our best interests? The act of withholding information is inherently evil, and besides why should learning be a sin?


Why do you not teach your 5 year old how to shoot a gun? It is undoubtedly useful...to send your child out and have them return with a couple of ducks? Maybe even teach the child to defend your household...possibly show the child off in a shooting competition.

But all it takes is one accident...one temper tantrum...one small mistake...and who knows how many precious lives could be lost. Perhaps the child's bullet would even find you. This is why we do not teach children how to handle guns...not until they are old enough to know the consequences of their actions.

This is the same with the knowledge of good and evil. Without that knowledge, we never think of breaking rules. Without that knowledge, it never occurs to us that we can avoid doing the right thing. We don't plot, we don't scheme. And the moment that knowledge was procured, every one of those opportunities came to light.

Considering how well we've displayed our ability to choose between right and wrong, was God correct to keep that knowledge out of the hands of those two people? Assuming the story is real, of course.

Tell me, was He right in doing that? Was he being overbearing...or did he foresee the destruction that would be wrought with such knowledge?



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 06:10 PM
link   
Perhaps the tree of good and evil and partaking of it's fruit had another meaning
It assumes that Adam and Eve were ignorant of good and evil following Gods law
Now if this God is a God of goodness then it would indicate that Adam and Eve were lead to evil ways by just the realization existed that there were other options to Gods goodness - Hence they lost their innocence and saw their nakedness IE saw their sin or turning away from goodness by being tempted by what other options held.
It is a story - Any could write such a story - Story's are for children.
Yet this story has deeper roots than recorded history
It describes Human Nature
Now if some ancient scribe can write such a story then I will write my own of my belief and I do have beliefs which I have not read in any book



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 06:25 PM
link   
reply to post by artistpoet
 


I'm wondering if perhaps that fruit was a representation of them looking at positive and negative as two separate concepts, rather than one single force that swings back and forth with natural momentum. It would have forced them to redefine their lives, causing the realizations noted in the Bible.

Just a thought. There are so many ways to look at it...



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 06:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by artistpoet
 


I'm wondering if perhaps that fruit was a representation of them looking at positive and negative as two separate concepts, rather than one single force that swings back and forth with natural momentum. It would have forced them to redefine their lives, causing the realizations noted in the Bible.

Just a thought. There are so many ways to look at it...


We each describe things in a different way I enjoy your way of describing and it rings true
I would say that at some point they made a choice which caused them to lose innocence
In a way if I understand you correctly - There is no good or bad it is just a way of looking at things
What I mean is - we all make mistakes and do things we would in hindsight have done differently - This does not mean we are bad if we are willing to learn from mistakes - Lol I am using the word bad but I hope you can understand me. If we make a mistake say steal from another and feel guilt or shame yet still continue to steal then we go against our own higher nature or knowing of good and evil
Lol Good and Evil are such evocative words but I hope you get what I mean
edit on 7-5-2012 by artistpoet because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 06:47 PM
link   
reply to post by artistpoet
 


That's exactly what I am saying. Negative reinforces positive, gives it meaning. If there were no shadows in the world, only light, how could you define that light? If there were no light and only shadows, how do you define darkness? Negative is what gives meaning to positive, and positive is what we're working towards...negative is the bumpers in our bowling lane. Sometimes we may miss the mark, but those bumpers teach us how to throw.

Eventually, you throw it straight down the lane, because you know how not to hit the bumpers...and EUREKA! Strike!



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Starchild23
 


No you would not teach a five year old to handle a gun, because what use would the 5 year old have for said gun? Besides part of the teaching them to use a gun would be teaching them that it is not a toy and has serious repercussion. There is a cause for every effect, and an effect for every cause. You must take the personal responsibility for your child's actions. Because you taught a child that does not know better to use a gun, the effect was that people died from irresponsible decisions. There was nothing dangerous about the knowledge being suppressed, and the analogy is irrelevant. Not even the same type of situations. What could they possibly have hurt by knowing the difference between good and evil. Even if you know the difference you still have to choose. No it was not done for their best interests, but done to keep them totally dependent on him for their needs and wants. When you withhold knowledge you withhold power. With great power comes great responsibility.

/E: Forgive me for the short thread...I meant for it to be longer, but due to the edit time limit I wasn't able to finish expounding on all of my points, so I had to cut to one of the last important connections.
edit on 7-5-2012 by SonofLeod because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 06:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Starchild23
 


That is a spot on description I can easily understand
So the tree of Knowledge in the Garden is necessary or we could not learn
After all if God put it there it must serve a purpose



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 07:08 PM
link   
reply to post by artistpoet
 


Actually, the version I was told regarding "original sin" was that God made Eden a place of absolute neutrality...a place where you would never be tempted to go wrong. At least, if you were born there. But see, his advisers didn't particularly approve of the plan...especially since every life form has to progress and eventually rejoin the Source.

So they suggested a test...one that was cunningly devised. If they hadn't eaten of the fruit, they would have been doomed to a stagnant state of development forever. However, in becoming "cursed" by the fruit, they were able to fully experience life. That, in itself, would be a topic for days worth of lectures...reflecting on the process of life, the decisions, checks and balance, and the necessity of sin, as well as breaking rules for the better of mankind.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 07:36 PM
link   
Does anyone know how I can finish my OP? Is it possible for a mod or admin to extend edit time? I feel like the way I left it now is incomplete and broken.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 07:38 PM
link   
reply to post by SonofLeod
 


That's why you start a new thread with the polished version...and leave a note saying to delete the first thread.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 08:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Starchild23
 


Merci Beaucoup, Monsieur.



posted on May, 8 2012 @ 01:25 PM
link   
Nothing is real... We are just delusional brains floating in '___'




top topics



 
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join