Let's assume we were on a Rogue planet, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 6-5-2012 @ 10:28 PM by Destinyone
reply to post by muse7



Just like I do here on earth. Turn to the critter standing next to me, ask them what time it it....

Des


reply posted on 6-5-2012 @ 10:35 PM by trollz
reply to post by muse7



You're right, it is a human invention in a sense. But if you're on another world... You either keep using Earth time, create a new measurement of time, or learn to live without it. It's a simple matter really.


reply posted on 6-5-2012 @ 10:47 PM by calstorm
reply to post by Destinyone



Exactly. I was thinking of things such as the length of pregnancy or how long it took a plant to sprout from a seed and then how long it took to flower.


reply posted on 6-5-2012 @ 10:54 PM by dorkfish87
reply to post by muse7



Well first we should ask how life could evolve on a rogue planet without a star for heat/small levels of radiation to encourage evolution



reply posted on 6-5-2012 @ 10:59 PM by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by muse7



What a fascinating question. It really is. As much as a quick answer came, I kept stopping at the obvious. Every simple solution thinks of the Deep Ocean labs or underground ones. ISS guys have similar issues...and it's all by using the clock as the clock and no relation to light levels out the window....

Then.. HECK! Ya got me. Where did the clock come from? To measure a 24hr day in a consistent way. ..and where the 24 hours come from? Yeah. You get circular on that in a hurry huh?

It seems to me that we'd still have chosen some block of time to measure the passage, but I suppose the basis of choosing it would be arbitrary in thinking of it, compared to the rock solid nature of our Sun. Hmmmm..

Now that is sure taking a moment to think about something!


reply posted on 6-5-2012 @ 11:07 PM by orionthehunter
Without a star for a heat source, a rogue planet would likely be lifeless and extremely cold.

If there were a steady heat source, such as a persistent volcanic heat source, then life might evolve.

As far as measuring time goes, we Earthlings would probably use whatever unit of time makes most sense and convert it for anyone interested. If we lived in a different star system not on a rogue planet, then we would likely use that planet's solar revolution cycle as a year. Proxima Centauri star system years might be years faster or slower than Earth years. If there were no star to use as a measurement of time, then we might use moon months or so many moon months to make a year. In this case the moon might be whatever satellite might be in orbit around the rogue planet. If we traveled to a rogue planet with constant darkness, then we humans might just bring our own clocks and stay with Earth time based clocks as a time measurement system.

If a rogue planet had rotation, the stars in the sky would keep shifting like they do here on Earth. Therefore you could use an arbitary system designating day time stars and then the other group of stars would be night time stars. Of course since the rogue planet was not in orbit around a star, the sky would be constantly dark. Stars in the distance are so far away, the star constellation patterns stay the same within our lifetimes. It would be the same on whatever rogue planet we visit unless that planet was moving almost light speed.
I'm talking about star constellation patterns for a given location wherever the rogue planet is located. If you visit a different rogue planet thousands of light years away in a different location, of course the constellations are going to be different.
edit on 6/5/12 by orionthehunter because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 6-5-2012 @ 11:19 PM by orionthehunter
reply to post by SpearMint



Anything may be possible but in my experience of what I have seen, life is based on molecular activity and if that activity is extremely small, the chances for life should be extremely small as well. I believe the vast majority of life will need some amount of heat to evolve or even to develop. I'm not saying heat sources are not present. I'm just saying I believe the chances of life developing on a planet with no heat sources near absolute zero are slim to none.
edit on 6/5/12 by orionthehunter because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Pokemon discovered in Venezuela
  Posted 14 days ago with 47 member flags
89-Year-Old Man Develops Bladeless Bird-Friendly Wind Turbine
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
Amazing snowflake images that you have never seen before.
  Posted 14 days ago with 44 member flags
Energy Solutions THEY don\'t want you to know about
  Posted 14 days ago with 35 member flags
Does this video show a working self propelled magnetic engine?
  Posted 7 days ago with 31 member flags
Viruses: alive or not?
  Posted 11 days ago with 30 member flags
NASA reveals secrets it has hidden on the Curiosity rover.
  Posted 17 days ago with 29 member flags