Without a star for a heat source, a rogue planet would likely be lifeless and extremely cold.
If there were a steady heat source, such as a persistent volcanic heat source, then life might evolve.
As far as measuring time goes, we Earthlings would probably use whatever unit of time makes most sense and convert it for anyone interested. If we
lived in a different star system not on a rogue planet, then we would likely use that planet's solar revolution cycle as a year. Proxima Centauri
star system years might be years faster or slower than Earth years. If there were no star to use as a measurement of time, then we might use moon
months or so many moon months to make a year. In this case the moon might be whatever satellite might be in orbit around the rogue planet. If we
traveled to a rogue planet with constant darkness, then we humans might just bring our own clocks and stay with Earth time based clocks as a time
measurement system.
If a rogue planet had rotation, the stars in the sky would keep shifting like they do here on Earth. Therefore you could use an arbitary system
designating day time stars and then the other group of stars would be night time stars. Of course since the rogue planet was not in orbit around a
star, the sky would be constantly dark. Stars in the distance are so far away, the star constellation patterns stay the same within our lifetimes.
It would be the same on whatever rogue planet we visit unless that planet was moving almost light speed.
I'm talking about star constellation patterns for a given location wherever the rogue planet is located. If you visit a different rogue planet
thousands of light years away in a different location, of course the constellations are going to be different.
edit on 6/5/12 by orionthehunter
because: (no reason given)