Though most of the evidence is circumstantial, It's not entirely true that some of the best evidence for potential ET UFOs is due to hoaxes, or
misidentification some of the best evidence is physical.
Consider some of the best publicly available data:
The COMETA Report (a scientific study of UFOs by the French government), released in 1999, indicated that of all the UFO cases they studied about 5%
were unexplained AND that the ET Hypothesis fit the unexplained data the best:
Project Blue Book Special Report 14 (a scientific study of UFO by the US government) indicated that of all the UFO cases they studied about 22% were
unexplained AND the more information they received of those 22% the LESS they were able to be explained.
Though many UFO may be unidentified military craft, we cannot claim that ALL UFO are military craft, consider the following:
July 29, 1952 USAF orders pilots to "shoot down" flying saucers over white house:
It is difficult to believe that if the craft flying over the White house in 1952 were secret military craft that they would fly it over the white
house, which is restricted airspace, not tell the president or the USAF, elicit a shoot down order and let it get to the point were the US military
placed Antiaircraft guns around US airports?
July 28, 1952 USAF admits that they have detected what appear to be "flying saucers" on radar and that they might be spacecraft from other planets.
April 7, 1952 LIFE magazine in cooperation with the USAF makes the case for ET visitation:
LIFE Magazine Admissions
Note conclusions 3 and 4
Conclusion 3: These objects cannot be explained by present science as natural phenomena-but soley as artificial devices, created and operated by a
Conclusion 4: Finally, no power plant known or projected on earth could account for the performance of these devices.
Many of these cases included multiple radar sightings at the same time from different locations, combined with visual sightings by the pilots and
laser ranging from equipment onboard the aircraft, indicating that the objects were solid and not psychological. Furthermore they exhibit performance
characteristics (both visually and on radar) that put them outside most publicly known human built craft and natural phenomena.
March 3, 1989 Shuttle Discovery astronaut radios to Houston "we have the Alien Spacecraft under observance"
Discovery Shuttle ET
NASA Astronaut Gordon Cooper wrote a letter to the UN stating that he does believe in ET UFOs and that he actually encountered UFOs:
Gordon Cooper ET
I will admit that none of this data proves that such objects are ET, but it does give strong evidence
edit on 7-5-2012 by deloprator20000
because: (no reason given)