It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Another in the bag; Ron Paul wins Maine

page: 2
72
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by babybunnies
Various different reports are saying that Ron Paul has raised more funds last month than both President Obama and Mitt Romney.

Looks like he'll be able to stay in the race all the way to the convention. Too bad GOP won't give him a platform to speak.

Hopefully, he'll use those funds to run as an independant. Anyone who cares enough about politics to actually look into where the Candidates stand on the issues of the day, instead of just blindly following whomever FOX NEWS or CNN tells them to vote for, would see that Dr Paul is the logical choice for a truly Conservative USA.


Do you have any links to such reports. If true, I'd like to read them.

Thanks....Des




posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:15 PM
link   
Hi People,

I'm not from America, i have not much to say for this matter, there have been some articles here in switzerland too about the American Elections this year. But can someone tell me why Ron Paul is never mentioned in any of those??? The thing is, newspapers here say like: Either Obama or Romney will win. No one else. I've even heard Ron Paul had given up already? But I anyway read daily here on ats about Ron Paul for President etc.. can someone answer that to me ? Thanks

Peace, Love and Light to all. Hope better years come ..



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Luzifer
 


Ok Luzifer it's very simple really. Then global mainstream media is owned by the few. They control what is reported and what isn't even in Switzerland. If the MSM is what you rely on for information they will tell you that the only man who can run against Obama is Romney. They tell you this because if they repeat a lie to you enough times your human brain will eventually believe it as fact. Fundamentally the majority of the people on this planet are far too busy with work, families, tv shows, video games, movies and their facebook account to do any real investigation into matters on their own thus they believe what they hear in passing as fact. Most major media corporations (television, print, radio, etc.) have a large amount of money invested in the "status quo" of corporatized government business partnership. So as long as it is in their interest they report what they want as fact not what is actually fact. The reason Obama and Romney are presented daily as the only choices is because they are one in the same. Their policies are alike, their attitudes are alike and they are paid by the same people. This is a tactic that was developed long ago but best exemplified by the mafia where they would own all the horses in a race. If you own all the horses you can't actually lose but the general public still views it as one side against another as long the media plays ball and doesn't ruin the illusion. This is something that has been going on in American politics for a long time now and as well in many other countries. Yes they are from different parties but that doesn't make them actually on different sides of an issue it just presents the illusion. Ron Paul doesn't play ball with corporations or media and so as far as they are concerned he can't win and so basically based on their reporting he doesn't exist. He doesn't exist because he is the true threat to the status quo and private agendas that are being forced upon us by those in power so they must do everything in their power to stop him. I hope that helps you understand a bit better.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 01:52 PM
link   
reply to post by charlyv
 


I don't know about your state but in Maryland I had to be registered with the party I planned to "support" by two weeks prior to the primaries. Search "(your state) primary voting rules" to see how it applies in your state.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 02:30 PM
link   
reply to post by The_Zomar
 


There is a whole lot of 'he said she said' going on in that quote there. Nothing provable. The 1000 unclaimed badged could have just as easily been Romney supporters.... right.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 02:34 PM
link   
Paul has 94 Delegates Romney has 865 Delegates with 1144 Romney needs 279 Paul WONT be the Nominee. Americans dont want a Truther as Pres. that blames america for 911.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 02:54 PM
link   
reply to post by knightrider078
 


Show me one source where Ron Paul has ever sided with the truth movement.

Also.. that delegate count you have there is projected not actual delegates. I would say it is cutting Ron Paul short and giving Romney more than he actually has. Not saying Romney isn't quite a bit ahead, but that is not an accurate count.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 02:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by zroth

Originally posted by HumanCondition
Can someone please clarify for me.
Is their still any chance of Ron winning the republican nomination?
Thanks.



If this process were truly democratic, yes.

Unfortunately only Super PAC candidates will make the ballot.

$1 billion is the price of entry to the white house this time around.



Actually, if the process were truly democratic, Romney would win. Why? Because that means the popular vote would be the end all be all.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 04:22 PM
link   
reply to post by Echo3Foxtrot
 


Actually when you eliminate all of the vote fraud, Romney would not be the winner.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 04:33 PM
link   
Its Ron Paul or no one at all... how do you like those two non-evils ...
Its been over a month now - We Are Awake - The Giant is Awake -- time to dispense JUST Ice.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by v1rtu0s0
 


yes he wouldn't be the winner.

but since the media is controlled and are freely promoting him as the presumptive nominee... its only going to promote lower voter turnout at the next primaries/caucuses... also lower turnout during the county/state conventions.

this is a good thing for the paul camp... hehehe



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 04:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by v1rtu0s0
 


yes he wouldn't be the winner.

but since the media is controlled and are freely promoting him as the presumptive nominee... its only going to promote lower voter turnout at the next primaries/caucuses... also lower turnout during the county/state conventions.

this is a good thing for the paul camp... hehehe



Of course, and the top reason the MSM says not to vote for Ron Paul is because he has no chance of winning. Which is a self fufilling prophecy, or at least an attempted one.

Speaking of Ron Paul, where is OKS at? I'm suprised he's not replying to every single comment in this thread.


There's like one Romney supporter period on ATS, and they made a thread. Of course I'm convinced the are on the campaigns bankroll.

edit on 7-5-2012 by v1rtu0s0 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 05:04 PM
link   
I was just on HuffPO and the GALL of them to have a Romney campaign guy quoted saying RON PAUL'S PEOPLE ARE BREAKING THE LAW!

I wanted to pull my hair out, my god these guys are sociopaths



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
reply to post by Echo3Foxtrot
 


Actually when you eliminate all of the vote fraud, Romney would not be the winner.


That's true. If there really is vote fraud. I happen to think that most Americans are dumb enough to vote for Romney.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 05:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Echo3Foxtrot

Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
reply to post by Echo3Foxtrot
 


Actually when you eliminate all of the vote fraud, Romney would not be the winner.


That's true. If there really is vote fraud. I happen to think that most Americans are dumb enough to vote for Romney.



"If" you say? I stopped updating this, but here's some evidence:

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 05:38 PM
link   
Why is this not on CNN? They are talking about terrorists, plane bombs, Muslims and trying to stir up hate..whats going on here?



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 05:45 PM
link   
I'm reading now that he got the other half of the delegates in Iowa....that means he picked up 100% there.

So what states has Romney won? I know he has Florida which is huge., and maybe new hampshire.

Can someone get an accurate Romney count? We all know what Paul's got, it gets posted daily.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 05:45 PM
link   
Just because Ron Paul is losing does not means there is voter fraud. It just means people dont want a 911 truther isolationist anti semitic as Pres



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 05:46 PM
link   
You mean they are reporting on NEWS and not someone that wont EVER be pres?

reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
 



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 05:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
I'm reading now that he got the other half of the delegates in Iowa....that means he picked up 100% there.

So what states has Romney won? I know he has Florida which is huge., and maybe new hampshire.

Can someone get an accurate Romney count? We all know what Paul's got, it gets posted daily.


Paul got the other half of delegates in Iowa? Do you have a link for that, I'd love to read it! Sorry, I don't really care about Romney's delegates, all I know is they are apparently getting less and less in numbers and are nothing like the media reports them as..

edit on 7-5-2012 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
72
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join