It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ben81
Chernobyl Legacy ... Need to See
Warning .. Graphic Images
Discretion Advise
In Japan the population is enormous for the land they have
There is no where to run
God Bless Japan and the Chernobyl victims
the contaminated land will affect all futur generations
Five Hundred Years will not be enought
The radioactive stuff will stay there for a long time
They though this energy was clean .. they knew the risk of this so called clean energy
the risk was for the entire planet and the 6 billions of humans
Originally posted by unityemissions
Originally posted by Covertblack
reply to post by amongus
I don't get your point. The media loves disasters, it's how they boost their rating etc. I really don't understand the benefit to them for not reporting it.
I'm of the belief that although the corporation loves their ratings to go up preying on peoples fears, there's a point that things get "too real" for them to be able to report. At some point, enough panic stirring the people would likely be deemed a matter of "national security". I believe that media blackouts, or brownouts happen from time to time.
Originally posted by wwwchronos
reply to post by amongus
1 im nota troll
2 i dont know what is glp
3 that info it pop in my head so i consider to write it here.
If that bother you please disregard this. And continue with life as is never happeneed
Originally posted by unityemissions
Originally posted by Covertblack
reply to post by amongus
I don't get your point. The media loves disasters, it's how they boost their rating etc. I really don't understand the benefit to them for not reporting it.
I'm of the belief that although the corporation loves their ratings to go up preying on peoples fears, there's a point that things get "too real" for them to be able to report. At some point, enough panic stirring the people would likely be deemed a matter of "national security". I believe that media blackouts, or brownouts happen from time to time.
Originally posted by Covertblack
reply to post by amongus
Do you really consider this site to be a totally reliable source of news?
Originally posted by amongus
Originally posted by Covertblack
reply to post by amongus
Do you really consider this site to be a totally reliable source of news?
Why are you here?
I'm sure CNN could use your viewership these days.
Originally posted by Covertblack
reply to post by unityemissions
If that were the case why was the initial disaster at the nuke plant covered? Or 9/11? Or Chernobyl?
Initially the media had to clue as to how any of these events were going to affect the world. Yet they covered all of them. Sorry, I agree the media is biased but they are also very self serving, and this would be the story of the year, decade, lifetime for a reporter.
Originally posted by Covertblack
Originally posted by unityemissions
Originally posted by Covertblack
reply to post by amongus
I don't get your point. The media loves disasters, it's how they boost their rating etc. I really don't understand the benefit to them for not reporting it.
I'm of the belief that although the corporation loves their ratings to go up preying on peoples fears, there's a point that things get "too real" for them to be able to report. At some point, enough panic stirring the people would likely be deemed a matter of "national security". I believe that media blackouts, or brownouts happen from time to time.
Fair enough. So then cite an example of an event so ground breaking as this that was covered up in the past. Please, keep it to events that could occur everyday, not Roswell etc.