It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why I chose Mitt Romney over Ron Paul and Barack Huessein Obama II

page: 22
22
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:17 PM
link   
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 


Congrats. You're a Neocon.

I've had enough of Neocons personally.. I'd do anything to avoid another. I wish you people would just form your own party and admit what you are: Nationalist and Socialist.




posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:18 PM
link   
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 


Obviously, you, along with the rest of the obomney supporters, are as accustomed to buying their lies as they are telling them. This is non sense.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrRichards
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 



He will try to put the power back into the states in order to simplify our current system. It would make it much easier to catch these political criminals and vote in or out who deserves it and not have to be forced to deal with what is given to you by the Fed Gov. If a company is doing something in your state that you don't like, you go to your governor and and tell him why. If he then does not care about the public interest he will get caught very fast and voted out.


You can do that today, and that's not going to stop corporatism sorry



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:22 PM
link   
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 


The whole eggs in one basket comment is basically saying that all of our troops will be in one spot ready to be blown up lol

Having troops surrounding your boarders and were they are actually needed is not having them all in one basket.

These wackos really no nothing about about military policy?

Sounds to me like people are coming up with wild scenarios.

Here is a good idea. Lets spread our military so far and wide that if we do get invaded we have less troops here to defend us. We will have to waist time and money to bring them all back here to fight on American soil. This TIME frame could be the end of us all. They could could take over DC before the bulk of troops get back here to fight. Same thing with New York, LA, Baltimore etc. We the people would have to defend our selves until the troops get back here to help.

See I can do it too. Wild scenario building.... Its like writing a story.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:23 PM
link   
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 


And why will it not stop corporatism? Please explain.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrRichards
reply to post by DelMarvel
 


He wants to cut FEDERAL REGULATION.

Not STATE REGULATION.

The states can regulate them selves. they don't need a big brother to tell them how.


Federal Programs protect the common man from corporations.... That's why unions were formed in the first place Ugh...



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:25 PM
link   
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 


I like your post

You forgot a couple things

The Romney fans don't think Romney is a Deity (RP fans do)
Romney can win (RP can't)



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:26 PM
link   
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 


You might be missing the fact of fazing out the Fed Gov. Making it impossible for a corporation to pay off the Fed law makers. If there are no federal law makers.... There is no one to pay off.

Thats when the states take over and we the people get to throw in or out who we see fit. Yes we can do that now with states but the Fed Gov can over rule sates laws. Git rid of them and they can't.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrRichards
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 


And why will it not stop corporatism? Please explain.


Because there is no federal regulations. There needs federal regulations like the EPA, the FCC, the SEC to regulate businesses to make sure that they are doing a good job at defending citizens liberties. That's the job of those gov't agencies to protect us. Now, there are crooks in those agencies too, who look for any loopholes they can find that will shut down a reasonably good company. Same goes for corporations but its a checks and balance system that works. No federal government policies will be very very bad, just like in the 1920s, companies would lock their workers in at night, bad pay for women and blacks, bad working conditions, child labor... Some of these things still exist today, but its a lot better than it was.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:29 PM
link   
Are you a Liberal Democrat? You sound like one.

Letting corporations buy, sell and build how they see fit is NOT corporatism.

Corporations influencing laws and paying off law makers IS.
edit on 7-5-2012 by MrRichards because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:29 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:30 PM
link   
reply to post by The Sword
 


Please explain what government run program is doing well? SS? Medicaid? How about Medicare? How about the post office? Privatizing is a good thing. Gives the power back to the people and away from the Government. Unless you like your power taken away from you. DO you even know what you want? Or are you just about the legalization of drugs that RP supports. lol



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:31 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:33 PM
link   
I find this thread terrifying, his proposals are nothing short of LUNACY and if anyone remotely considers voting for him...wow the US is in a worse state than anyone realises.

He believes in a strong military offensive, sounds nice but how will this be paid for ? Who's he going to borrow the money from ? Are people today going to burden future generations with even more debt instead of addressing the issues ? Anyone who thinks thats a good idea shouldnt be a parent.

Hes going to welcome MORE immigrants...where are they going to work ? Immigration is only viable if your workforce isnt big enough to satisfy your industry and this obviously is NOT the case, why would a Mexican, for example want to come to the US ? They can work in US auto makers factories in Mexico !!

Eliminating Taxes and cutting them sounds great, but cutting 25% from corporations ? FFS a blind man can see thats a total joke, we continually read how they avoid paying tax, every day you read of them exporting YOUR jobs and he wants to cut the joke amounts they pay by 25%, that is nothing short of insulting to the people of America....and this helps addressing the debt how exactly ?

The man is INSANE, he should be locked up, a vote for him is a nail in the coffin of the US, PLEASE wake up my american friends, do NOT destroy your own country by voting for this suicidal agenda.

*edit was for a typo
edit on 7-5-2012 by SceoticalSam because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrRichards
Are you a Liberal Democrat? You sound like one.

Letting corporations buy, sell and build how they see fit is NOT corporatism.

Corporations influencing laws and paying off law makers IS.
edit on 7-5-2012 by MrRichards because: (no reason given)


No, I understand why the government is needed on a federal level. You do not! You just keep on reiterating your same talking points about corporations influencing laws and paying off law makers, well guess what. Giving the power to the states and eliminating any government oversight which helps stop that, will not make the problem go away. I don't think you have thought through the plan. Tell me how states will stop the corporate influence without government oversight? This is a typical Paul attack to make conservatives look like liberals because they understand that some federal government is needed!
edit on 7-5-2012 by jjf3rd77 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by dalan.
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 



No federal government policies will be very very bad, just like in the 1920s, companies would lock their workers in at night, bad pay for women and blacks, bad working conditions, child labor... Some of these things still exist today, but its a lot better than it was.


Who cares? Its 2012, not 1920, if your employer does something like the above...

Find a different job.

Derp.


i wouldnt want to work at a pure corporatism company, which is what they will become if Ron Paul world becomes reality!



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:44 PM
link   
I can't take living in this ocean of over inflated opinionated, blissfully ignorant and self righteous fish any more.

I'm going to go hang my self with a cherry licorice whip. So that way, when I fail, I can blame the corporation who made the whip and sold it to me.

But wait...... Suicide is bad, so maybe I should have a big Federal Government to stop me from doing it?

But Its my body..... and I should be able to kill myself if I want to.........

But suicide is bad so, I guess I can't make my own decisions?

But I got this far so Obviously I can.......

Nope because I'm dumb and they are smarter than me. I can't choose for my self. That would be just silly.

Maybe I should just stick to blaming the licorice whip?



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:45 PM
link   
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 


If people stop buying the crap and stop working to make the crap..... THERE IS NO CRAP.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:48 PM
link   
You are Pro-Corporation, you told me that. Now you are saying that we need government to stop Corporatism.

Which is it, bud?

You are so misguided but, eventually, the truth will come out even in you.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 12:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrRichards
I can't take living in this ocean of over inflated opinionated, blissfully ignorant and self righteous fish any more.

I'm going to go hang my self with a cherry licorice whip. So that way, when I fail, I can blame the corporation who made the whip and sold it to me.

But wait...... Suicide is bad, so maybe I should have a big Federal Government to stop me from doing it?

But Its my body..... and I should be able to kill myself if I want to.........

But suicide is bad so, I guess I can't make my own decisions?

But I got this far so Obviously I can.......

Nope because I'm dumb and they are smarter than me. I can't choose for my self. That would be just silly.

Maybe I should just stick to blaming the licorice whip?



um, can you answer my question without going on some delusional rant??? I don't like big government over extended policies any more than you do, but they at least help us protect ourselves against some corporate rules....



new topics




 
22
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join