posted on May, 6 2012 @ 05:09 PM
reply to post by syrinx high priest
Because it isn't exactly true. Anyone could have worked to become a delegate including Romney supporters, if his supporters are so ardent and aren't
just voting for "the best chance to beat Obama (ie not real Romney supporters)" then I think it could be argued that the Paul delegates are BETTER
representing the will of the voters.
When you see vote counts on t.v., but you look around and only see Paul supporters putting work in and sticking around after the vote who deserves the
representation? It's all subjective. There is absolutely nothing wrong with what they are doing especially since Paul supporters are playing a game
rigged by the house.
I know it's becuase you guys have an agenda and stuff, but I wish people could put that aside and just say "yeah, in reality I know exactly why this
is happening, it's obvious that corruption is there and that these other candidates don't represent the people at all"
There is no subversion of democracy! The voting system is the most ridiculous convoluted thing I have ever seen and this is the primaries we still
have the electoral college and etc. There is no democracy in this system so he is playing the system against itself and has no worries of subverting
democracy where there isn't any. The whole point of the system was to be able to manipulate it at a whim otherwise it would just be the most popular
Besides Paul delegates are giving these t.v. hypnotards better representation than they would as Romney delegates. Giving them what they want (rather
than Romney just telling them what they want to hear).
edit on 6-5-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)