It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

HAARP Wars

page: 2
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 6 2012 @ 02:11 PM
link   
reply to post by ArrowsNV
 


Then why are we using it?

Your phone isn't 100% safe. Why do you use it? Could it be because the benefits outweigh the slight (less than 100% safe) risk?

The benefits of the research done at HAARP outweigh the slight risks.

edit on 5/6/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 6 2012 @ 02:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mandrakerealmz
reply to post by Phage
 

I have a problem with the concept of patents in general but thats another story lol.....

What do you mean no connection. Bernard Eastlund said he based his designs of Teslas warenclyffe. Was many years in the future so it was approached differently.

hehe. Bernards ideas for the catalyst and how to disperse it were quite out landish. He envisioned a network of satellites dumping the catalyst onto the planet lol. However fueling satellites is insane.

So they went with "Project Evergreen" instead
Chemtrail spraying planes are easier to fuel lol.... Although not all of the chemtrail programs are associated to the haarp network. Although some are, They assist in precipitation.

I find it interesting to compare his satellites idea to how it was actually done with drone 747's. Scientists think impractical sometimes lol




And with that! Phage has been defeated!!!! Never thought I'd see the day. Is there anyone you want to thank? lmao



posted on May, 6 2012 @ 02:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by ArrowsNV
 

Is your cell phone 100% safe?
Is radar 100% safe?
Is a microwave oven 100% safe?
Those are "electro-transmitting systems" too.


Hi Phage, It seems you have quite a brilliant mind there. So, would you mind answering what should be a very simple question for you?

I keep hearing how it's possible to fill the air with electricity that can run home appliances and all kinds of things. If this much electricity can pass constantly through the air, how does one not get electrocuted merely by washing dishes in a metal sink? Or by standing barefoot in water? The whole idea seems scary to me.



posted on May, 6 2012 @ 02:23 PM
link   
reply to post by swoopaloop
 

Really?
Where is the backup for these statements?

Bernard Eastlund said he based his designs of Teslas warenclyffe.


Bernards ideas for the catalyst and how to disperse it were quite out landish. He envisioned a network of satellites dumping the catalyst onto the planet lol.


So they went with "Project Evergreen" instead



posted on May, 6 2012 @ 02:30 PM
link   
reply to post by jiggerj
 


I'm not phage, but I'll give it a shot...

It sounds like if you wanted that + charge you'd have to have a device to convert it from the ambient air...

Say ambient air has a - and a + charge which would make it nuetral.

In my mind you'd need a device to harness the + charge.

Sounds about right too me, but I haven't done the research just a hypothesis.



posted on May, 6 2012 @ 02:35 PM
link   
reply to post by yoyoyoyo
 


That's pretty much it. Air can't be "filled with electricity" because it is neutral and a pretty good insulator.

Tesla's ideas about the transmission of electrical power involved sending it through earth. A very inefficient system which is one reason it isn't used.



posted on May, 6 2012 @ 02:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Free energy will exist to the public soon, IMO.

I wish a tesla ambient air system could be created, but any free energy device is a start for the inevitable.


Thanks phage for verifying my statements , It clicked in my mind. Also I PM'd you awhile back, If you could alt+f yoyoyoyo in your pm's that would be great.


God speed, Mi amigo.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 04:17 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Here is a link to the Patent detailing what I said. www.bariumblues.com...


Satellite reference

3. The method of claim 2 wherein said artificial particles are provided by injecting same into said at least one region from an orbiting satellite.


What it does

A method and apparatus for altering at least one selected region which normally exists above the earth's surface. The region is excited by electron cyclotron resonance heating to thereby increase its charged particle density. In one embodiment, circularly polarized electromagnetic radiation is transmitted upward in a direction substantially parallel to and along a field line which extends through the region of plasma to be altered. The radiation is transmitted at a frequency which excites electron cyclotron resonance to heat and accelerate the charged particles. This increase in energy can cause ionization of neutral particles which are then absorbed as part of the region thereby increasing the charged particle density of the region.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 09:47 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on May, 7 2012 @ 11:08 AM
link   
reply to post by Mandrakerealmz
 

In Eastlund's patent the "satellite reference" is about injecting materials into the ionosphere. There is no "catalyst" and nothing is dumped "onto the planet".

Further, artificial particles, e.g., electrons, ions, etc., can be injected directly into region R from an earth-launched rocket or orbiting satellite carrying, for example, a payload of radioactive beta-decay material; alpha emitters; an electron accelerator; and/or ionized gases such as hydrogen; see U.S. Pat. No. 4,042,196. The altitude can be greater than about 50 km if desired, e.g., can be from about 50 km to about 800 km, and, accordingly may lie in either the ionosphere or the magnetosphere or both.

www.bariumblues.com...
You're claiming that "chemtrails" are dispersed at 50km? What planes fly at that altitude?

HAARP does not utilitize the addition of such materials.

What about your claims about Tesla?




top topics



 
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join