It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ToeJamX
Isn't it obvious by now that you have no say in who the GOP candidate will be? How often do you even hear Ron Paul's name in the media. It's been predecided folks, your vote means nothing.
Give it time. He always manages to sneak in when you least expect it...
Originally posted by imawlinn
What the hell is the Gop thinking? They are backing the man that lost to the man that lost to Obama? And six pages deep on a Ron Paul thread and outkast hasn't chimed in? Something is not roght.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
reply to post by Propulsion
I would prefer Ron Paul to win the nomination and not accept the nomination to run third party. That would be news that creates shock waves around the world.
Originally posted by imawlinn
And six pages deep on a Ron Paul thread and outkast hasn't chimed in? Something is not roght.
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by nenothtu
Why would you let a simple name deter you?
He dislikes what the Republican party has become just as much as you do, and he's made that clear on several occasions.
Have you read his letter to Reagan in 1987? He is fighting to regain control of the party and return it to it's origins.
Originally posted by Propulsion
reply to post by nenothtu
Like I said, I think RP would gain a lot more votes against Obama if he switched to a third party. A lot of people don't see that. I'm seeing the....."The only republican who can beat Obama” mentality. That sounds great, but he is going to need every vote he can get to beat Obama…
Originally posted by LoonyConservative
Ok so if RP wins the nomination, but doesnt beat Obama... what then?
2nd
Could you please elaborate...?
Originally posted by eLPresidente
reply to post by Propulsion
I would prefer Ron Paul to win the nomination and not accept the nomination to run third party. That would be news that creates shock waves around the world.
Originally posted by nenothtu
If Paul were to go third party and divorce himself from the Republicans, I would consider him.
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by DelMarvel
Oh, give me a break. Now democracy is "mob rule"?
Yes. It has been considered so since the beginning of the United States as a nation.
You sure you really know much about Paul?
In his own words:
[exThe problem is that democracy is not freedom. Democracy is simply majoritarianism, which is inherently incompatible with real freedom. Our founding fathers clearly understood this, as evidenced not only by our republican constitutional system, but also by their writings in the Federalist Papers and elsewhere. James Madison cautioned that under a democratic government, “There is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party or the obnoxious individual.” John Adams argued that democracies merely grant revocable rights to citizens depending on the whims of the masses, while a republic exists to secure and protect pre-existing rights. Yet how many Americans know that the word “democracy” is found neither in the Constitution nor the Declaration of Independence, our very founding documents?