It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Remember those at the BBC knowing-reporting it beforehand?
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by Nathan-D
What you are missing in your post is that Internal collapse started at least 7 seconds before the outer shell collapsed. There is direct video evidence for this. And it negates the suggestion that failure was instantaneous.
Originally posted by AnotherEnergyVictim
These well-documented posts convinced me but now I need to know what was so important about this building that it had to be destroyed? What was kept in this building that posed such a threat to someone big?
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Juanxlink
Remember those at the BBC knowing-reporting it beforehand?
More silliness.
Part of the problem of the so-called "9/11 Truth Movement".
They never deal in facts, only in rumors, and hear-say and the same ole', same ole' that has become so prevalent.
Hopefully, there will be future generations of people who will learn, by examining the EVIDENCE, rather than simply 'judging' from RUMOR.
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Apocalypse1
Logical fallacy.
Ooh, sorry. I didn't realize those were the only planes scheduled to fly that day.
Or that they were the only planes with Arabs on 'em.
"CORRECTION"
On September 11, 2001, those were the only (known) flights with "Arabs on 'em" (as you put it) who were INTENT on HIJACKING 'em.
The rest of the flights, that MIGHT have had "Arabs on 'em" (as you put it) were fine....they landed, per FAA order. Just fine. However, there is ONE OTHER big question mark.....it is UNITED 23....JFK to LAX....never got off the ground.....(look it up).
BIG (eta)...the only "ARABS" that may have happened to be on ANY of the flights that day who were intent on mayhem??
Well, we know of at least 19.......
The rest who might "happen" to be Arab, who were completely innocent on other flights? Well....it's like saying,
"Well, there were some Catholics and Mormons and Atheists on the flights, on 9/11. And, some Lutherans and Buddhists and Methodists, too!!"
Gee.
The ones who did this may (or may not) have subscribed to any one "faith".....but, they all certainly had a similar AGENDA!!!!
edit on Fri 4 May 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by Varemia
To get the building to fit required long cantilever trusses to span the distance - more like a bridge than a
skyscraper
These trusses were under tremendous stress
I also want to add that your claim that "UAL 93? SAME course....to the D.C. area. This is blatantly clear." is false. No one knows for a fact what fl. 93's target was. You might wanna' do a little research yourself and Google "Fl. 93 three mile island." [/ex
So why were the hijackers dialing in the VOR beacon at Reagan National which is one mile from the Pentagon
If were on course to 3 Mile Island would be using the beacon at Harrisburg airport (which is actually in
Middletown where 3 Mile is)
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
.... so a collapse always means a keel over.
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
It is so curious how it reminds one of the missing trillions of dollars from the Pentagon budget which also disappeared
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by Nathan-D
Since early afternoon had anticipated WTC 7 was in danger of collapse. Building had fires on multiple floors
Originally posted by Whaler31
reply to post by -PLB-
The insides of WTC7 started collapsing prior to the exterior shell collapsing, is that the information that explains it falling with zero resistance?
The NIST report says that the collapse started at a specific column (column 79) This column was way off to the far side of the building, so why the uniform drop, and why didn't the rest of the undamaged columns cause at least an uneven collapse, or offer any resistance whatsoever?
The following shows the back of building 7, just prior to it's perfect CD collapse:
Yes, it had to be the fires that brought number 7 down!
edit on 6-5-2012 by Whaler31 because: (no reason given)edit on 6-5-2012 by Whaler31 because: Youtube linking problemsedit on 6-5-2012 by Whaler31 because: finding youtube number in the url
Originally posted by Whaler31
I know just the place! These folks have been studying this very subject for a decade:
Architects & Engineers for 911 truth. Over 1850 qualified members, and 14,000 regular members.
They have been putting out nothing but science and fact regarding the controlled demolitions of World Trade Center Towers 1,2 & 7,