Fox News beats all rivals! How about that?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 29-9-2004 @ 10:01 PM by kegs


www.upi.com...

WASHINGTON, Oct. 20 (UPI) -- It's official -- watching Fox News makes you ignorant.

To be precise, researchers from the Program on International Policy at the University of Maryland found that those who relied on Fox for their news were more likely than those who relied on any other news source to have what the study called "significant misperceptions" about the war in Iraq.

Pollsters asked more than 9,000 Americans about three commonly held canards: that the United States had hard evidence Saddam Hussein had been working closely with al-Qaida; that weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq; and that world public opinion was in favor of the U.S.-led war.

Overall, a scary 60 percent believed at least one of these fallacies. Eight percent believed all three.

The most commonly held was -- unsurprisingly -- the Iraq/al-Qaida link. Fully 48 percent of respondents believed this. The totals for the other two were in the 20 percent to 25 percent range.

But among those who get their news from Fox, 80 percent had at least one "misperception" and 45 percent -- nearly six times the overall average -- had all three.



reply posted on 29-9-2004 @ 10:35 PM by The Big O
Originally posted by Jimi Hendrix
This is all i found.

At national organizations (which includes print, TV and radio), the numbers break down like this: 34% liberal, 7% conservative. At local outlets: 23% liberal, 12% conservative. At Web sites: 27% call themselves liberals, 13% conservatives.

I worked in the newsroom at three large newspapers for 22 years, and many of the journalists who rate themselves as politically moderate are well to the left of center, especially on social issues

www.instapundit.com...

[edit on 29-9-2004 by Jimi Hendrix]


Um, I don't really consider instapundit a reliable source for facts and statistics but what you are saying is basically correct.

When you ask "reporters" or those who work in a newsroom what they rate themselves you will find more "liberals."

However, that's because the entry level pay for radio/tv/print is not high enough to attacted "conservative" or right wing people. If you worked at a newspaper you know what I mean. You find a fresh person working the newsroom, someone brand new, and ask them what they make. It's crap. More "liberals" attempt to get into news media than conservatives.

The right simply does not tend to be attracted to these types of positions. There is a lost of socioeconomical data here I'm no exxpert on. But that was a key argument as to why the worker bees in the news media always seem to number mostly "liberal."

However, you know, as much as I do, and statistics support this, that when you look at the alignments of the editor positions, and the positions of those on the boards of the companies who control these media outlets, they are definatly right leaning.

GE owns NBC. Are you telling me that those from GE that oversee the operations of NBC are "liberal?" I highly doubt it.

Anyways, I'm not explaining myself really well here.

Check out www.whatliberalmedia.com...

This is Eric Alterman's book on the matter. I read it a while ago and that's what I'm trying to remember this stuff from.

Carry on! This is a good thread.


reply posted on 6-10-2004 @ 09:31 AM by Loki
Great, Great.

And I'll tell you exactly why this happened.

FOX news panders to a lower class of citizen, and I don't mean lower class finiancially.

What I mean by this is...now, I'm going to try to put this as delicately as possible...the bottom crust of America's intelligence/social strata watch FOX news religiously.

Here's why:

Almost all of their reporting/broadcasting is done with a 'high intensity' mood to it, IE everything is 'BREAKING NEWS!!' and a 'NEWS ALERT!', even if it's just an update on the Michael Jackson case. The reason this is done is so that the eyes are drawn to it while clicking through the channels. This isn't the way that they do it when there's big news afoot...this is how it is every single day.

What FOX news lacks in intelligent reporting, it makes up for in being watcher-friendly. Everything from Enjoyable commercials, to (I kid you not, they are the only news broadcast that allows this to happen) People screaming their faces red while arguing about minute political issues.

Their broadcast is slanted to the right, a direction that many financially challenged citizens associate with tax cuts at a subconscious level.

Let's face it everyone...Bill O'Reilly is actually pretty fun to watch.

To right wingers, he's a genius, who captivates the imagination.

To left wingers, he's a moron, who's underhanded tactics to make his guests look like idiots make us laugh. It's like an inept monkey doing Daily Show sketches from a right-wing perspective. Funny, but at the same time sad...

I think it's a real shame that so many people get their news from FOX.

Just pick up the paper, folks.



reply posted on 6-10-2004 @ 05:18 PM by bunkbuster
Originally posted by Loki
God, I feel like I've been taking crazy pills for the last few years...


ease up on yerself, mugatu.

(apologies if that's not an intentional zoolander reference.)

Interesting headline in today's Wall Street Journal:


News Corp will consider buying the 18% of Fox Entertainment it doesn't already own.


To me, that means it's a done deal. Fox is already controlled by the draconian News Corporation, and our impartial buddy in big business, billionaire Rupert Murdoch.


Oligopoly brief: News Corporation

Of all the great media oligopolies, the News Corporation is the most multinational. This $20 billion company derives 75% of its revenue from the US, but its presence in Europe, Latin America, Asia, and Australia is very strong. While its greatest assets are now in broadcasting and satellite TV, it has is a major movie studio, a newspaper leader in the UK and in Australia, and a major book publisher, as well.

In spite of its multinational scope, the company is identified with one man: Australian newspaper tycoon Rupert Murdoch who built the company in 1980 and directs it like a private holding, which it is not. He runs it like an exacting autocrat, giving key roles to his sons and other relatives.

source


Murdoch is also interested in moving the the company to the U.S., to capitalize on the investment opportunities we have to offer, and to take advantage of our texas style, freewheelin' corporate policies.


.
The Australian Council of Superannuation Investors, which represents 32 pension funds managing 85 billion Australian dollars, or $62 billion, and Corporate Governance International, last week said they would advise members to oppose the move if News Corp. abolished Australian rules.

Murdoch wants to shift to the United States to have News Corp. included on the benchmark S&P 500 index, allowing more U.S. investors to buy the stock. Some investors are concerned that the proposal, to be voted on this month, would strengthen the Murdoch family's control over the company.

source


News, shmooze. Ratings shmatings. Balanced shmalanced. Fox News is a small puzzle piece in a larger multinational entertainment octopus, designed to sell advertising space for products and attitudes. This is big, big business, and in the game of shaping public opinion, the biggest business. In between, they'll air whatever gets most folks watching, including a variety of lame "reality shows" of which I consider Fox news one of. As soon as you put a camera man's angle, and a writer's spin on "reality" it's newsiness is lost to me. Don't bore me with arguments that Fox is better or worse than other major news outlets. This only reinforces the misguided belief that any of them are anything but fountains spewing corporate spin.

It's painful for me to watch my father watch Fox News. He finds the anchors more "entertaining" as well, bless his misinformed heart.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



A MUST Read, "Written By A Female Cop"
  Posted 4 days ago with 34 member flags
Know your enemy ... the Daily Mail & Viscount Rothermere
  Posted 13 days ago with 17 member flags
Pictures That Shocked The World (viewer discretion advised)
  Posted 2 days ago with 12 member flags
NBC and the Banned \'Fear Factor\' Episode
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags