It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Is it animal, vegetable or mineral -- or something else entirely?
The collective brainpower of several dozen scientists was unable to unravel the mystery of a strange beast nearly half a billion years old, tentatively nicknamed “Godzillus.”
Ron Fine, an amateur paleontologist from Dayton, Ohio, hoped the supersmart group of scientists at a regional meeting of the Geological Society of America could help explain the baffling find he made recently: the fossil of a very large, very mysterious "monster" that lived near Cincinnati 450 million years ago.
Unfortunately, the sea beast of Cincinnati had them scratching their heads, too.
“Everybody else was just as puzzled as we are -- and personally, I think that’s pretty awesome,” Fine told FoxNews.com.
He found the fossilized specimen last summer, a roughly elliptical shape with multiple lobes totaling almost 7 feet in length. It dates from almost half a billion years ago, when a shallow sea covered Cincinnati.
And despite its size, no one has ever found a fossil of this “monster” until its discovery by the amateur paleontologist last year.
But neither Fine nor the other members of the Dry Dredgers, an association of amateur paleontologists based at the University of Cincinnati that has a long history of collaborating with professional scientists, could explain what it is.
“We all have a theory, that’s the problem! We’re considering both animal and plant,” Fine told FoxNews.com. “We know it’s a fossil, something that was alive. But it’s so different than anything else, we can’t tell if it's animal or plant.”
David L. Meyer of the University of Cincinnati geology department -- and co-author of "A Sea without Fish: Life in the Ordovician Sea of the Cincinnati Region" -- is able to whittle it down a little, though he remains just as baffled.
“In general, we’re heading toward this being some sort of microbial structure that was preserved on the sea bottom, and it preserved some unusual patterns in the rock,” he told FoxNews.com.
The fossil's size, shape and texture stood out from the layer of rock in which it was found. Its texture was a particularly telltale sign of a living organism — the fossil was covered in mini-ripples, sort of like wrinkles or corrugation, Meyer said.