Genesis Of Contradiction, ONEreply to post by
I'll begin to explore the LOST BIRD theme now from a couple of new angles. Stated succinctly, "LOST BIRD" is both at once an observation, and a
conclusion, startling and incontrovertible.
The observation is that a serious contradiction exists. In reviewing statements/written accounts made/given by Apollo 11 Mission principals,
including statements/written accounts made/given by the astronauts themselves and key flight officers such as FIDO H. David Reed, and in studying
official NASA Apollo 11 relevant documents such as the VOICE TRANSCRIPT, APOLLO 11 MISSION REPORT, and the APOLLO 11 TECHNICAL CREW DEBRIEFING
REPORT, one learns that an OFFICIAL claim was made on the part of NASA to the effect that the landing site of the Eagle was not known with any
degree of certainty, that is, not known to within a distance of at best roughly 5 miles from where the Eagle was ultimately claimed to have been
parked at 0.6875 north and 23.433 east. These official selenographic coordinates having been announced on 08/01/1969, the day the astronomy/telescope
team at Lick Observatory first successfully targeted the LRRR. The stark contradiction stems from one's noticing that despite this official claim,
there is evidence within the aforementioned documents, and in particular, within TABLE 5-IV of the APOLLO 11 MISSION REPORT(Published November 1969),
that contrary to this official and very public general claim of the Eagle having been LOST, its selenographic perch having remained indeterminate for
11 days from the time of its allegedly settling on the lunar surface, that the Eagle had indeed been tracked quite well by MSFN, that tracking being
corroborated by MSFN similar landing site solutions provided by both the AGS and PNGS systems. The corroboration , the correlation of the MSFN, AGS
and PNGS solutions therefore endorsing the excellent reliability and accuracy of the MSFN numbers. The MSFN (NASA's alleged best system for
locating/tracking the ships) had determined the Eagle to have settled roughly 0.75 miles from the 08/01/1969 officially announced Tranquility Base
coordinates, this, well within the system's expected "error". Indeed, with the Lick Observatory laser being roughly 2 miles in diameter upon its
lunar arrival, were Houston to have provided the observatory with the MSFN coordinates listed in the Apollo 11 Mission Report Table 5-IV, and assuming
there were no timing/software problems, the LRRR would have been successfully targeted on the evening of 07/20/1969, based on those MSFN derived
The contradiction as outlined above, and as discussed in detail in prior posts, leads to the startling and inevitable conclusion that the Apollo 11
Mission was fraudulent, for how can one both know where the Eagle was, per the Apollo 11 Mission Report Table 5-IV, and at the same time, have no
meaningful sense as to its location, at least within the 5 miles so referenced above ?
The explanation for this at-first-blush-conundrum begins with one's recognition that the Apollo fraud perpetrators could not have pretended to have
lost the Eagle entirely. THAT would simply have been too implausible. Even the most gullible would have become suspicious were such a ridiculous
premise pitched, "WE SIMPLY HAVEN'T THE FOGGIEST NOTION WHERE THAT BIRD IS". Wouldn't work. Given the problem with plausibility here, they could not
give exact real-time coordinates, as the astronauts were NOT REALLY ON THE MOON. If they did say "0.6875 north and 23.43 east" in real-time, a
geologist might have suggested that could not be correct on this that or the other grounds, for example on the basis of the (albeit bad) tv image, or
the fact that the astronauts were denying they could see the McDonald Observatory laser from that alleged selenographic vantage, and so forth and so
on. If the coordinates were disclosed in real time, the astronauts could be found out to be "Tranquility Truant" and so busted as charlatans. A
real-time fraud perpetrator approach, meaning an evening of 07/20/1969, morning of 07/21/1969 approach, is then taken to place the astronauts more or
less/probably within in the area encompassed by the LAM 2 flown map landing site ellipse, but that's as close as anyone's gonna' get to finding these
guys, somewhere around there. www.hq.nasa.gov...
Once the astronauts return home, and the McDonald Observatory astronomers are no longer trying to pelt them with argon laser photons, and so forth,
the Apollo 11 thespians, Collins, Armstrong and Aldrin, are then in the clear. NASA tells us that they had a team of Apollo lunar scientists,
including Donald Beattie, whose book I have already had the occasion to quote frequently, subject the photos and flight data to rigorous analysis.
This information was then passed to the Lick Observatory staff, and as a result, the LRRR was finally targeted , 08/01/1969. And so Tranquility was
edit on 19-6-2012 by decisively because: spelling, university> observatory, commas, added "fraud perpetrator", added "on the evening of
07/20/1969", added quote marks,added qutes and "albeit", added" for example on the basis of", added "?",added "Given the problem with plausibility
here", added hyphens X 3, added "notion"
edit on 19-6-2012 by decisively because: added "begins with one's recognition that
edit on 19-6-2012 by decisively because: added "have", pretend> pretended, be> have been
edit on 19-6-2012 by
decisively because: annot> could not, added "real-time"