posted on May, 3 2012 @ 06:30 PM
reply to post by Starchild23
Does the article state that the student claimed it wasn't intended as an insult? And if it does...does that make it fact? All we really have here is
opinions...the only one who knows for sure is the student himself, and from reading though the thread i'd say that a sufficient number of people have
come forward stating that they believe it to be in the very least provocative.
The only real, hard facts here are the kid wore the shirt for two weeks, got warned, ignored the warnings, got suspended and is now saying he shall
wear it again on his return...there's one very important, obvious fact that we can extrapolate from the above statement - the student certainly
hasn't learned anything, and is still intent on defying the rules...whether he likes it or not the final word should be with the school and still he
He'll be expelled next, the one thing he is actually at school to do is learn and clearly he's learnt nothing, he thinks his self righteousness and
pretentiousness is more important than the final word of the school and his education...why you are defending him is beyond me, but fair play to
you...you've made some interesting points.
But it's still down to individual opinion on this one and I doubt there's a right or wrong answer, or at least an answer everyone will agree on...so
I hope he wears the shirt again, if only for the thread about him being expelled for outright pig-headed defiance...oh, the lulz!