Chemtrail Spraying Caught in Action!! , page 6


Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times


reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 04:34 PM by AndyMayhew
reply to post by ProudBird



You missed my irony

Chemtrails most definitely exist, because they are nothing more than contrails


reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 04:34 PM by ProudBird
reply to post by luxordelphi



You incorrigible rogue - always phishing for personal information. I was asking you to judge, for yourself, based on the news story I linked. In a world where airlines have contracts with the government, what is it that you think happens when a pilot says wth or no, I'm not willing to fly this or dump this or spray this or look the other way on this?


WHERE have I "phished" for personal info???

I merely asked if you have bothered to make the simple effort to inter-act with 'KNOWN' airline pilots, besides the one who is at your disposal, here at ATS....but who is 'anonymous', per the ATS protocols.

I suggested that you may wish to 'be-friend' some other airline pilots, in some manner, and thus get some secondary verification of ALL of what I have written, to date.

That is all.


reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 04:35 PM by luxordelphi
reply to post by Gmoneycricket



Did you leave the part about a pilot dieing out on purpose? I think the point was sometimes people die before the truth comes out or is dealt with.

F-22 Raptor Jet Crashes in Mohave Desert - Pilot Dies

F-22 Raptor pilot confirmed killed in Alaska crash

Yes, G., the main point was to support the pilots that don't want to fly them and are faced with the military monolith when it comes to refusing orders.

Topically, for the thread, it was to give back on those who say that those suspecting would speak out. Would they really! It's to illustrate a point, a rock and a hard place point, of a life and a livelihood, with all its' dependencies.



reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 04:42 PM by ProudBird
reply to post by luxordelphi



You should be ASHAMED of yourself!!!!

This post has nothing...NOTHING...to do withn so-called "chemtrails"!

Wow. Sinking to a new low?


reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 04:59 PM by AndyMayhew
reply to post by Gmoneycricket



You want meteorologists to spend taxpayers money proving something which they know doesn't exist isn't there?

Isn't it for you to prove it IS there?

What next? We think fairies make lightning and unless NOAA proves fairies don't exist then it must be true .... ? @@:


reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 05:13 PM by Gmoneycricket
Originally posted by AndyMayhew
reply to
post by Gmoneycricket



You want meteorologists to spend taxpayers money proving something which they know doesn't exist isn't there?

Isn't it for you to prove it IS there?

What next? We think fairies make lightning and unless NOAA proves fairies don't exist then it must be true .... ? @@:


So they can't do it,
or are they refusing to bring proof to the table again.
The weather service has planes in the air everyday,
so the extra expense argument does not work,
Try Again.


reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 06:00 PM by ProudBird
reply to post by Gmoneycricket



The weather service has planes in the air everyday,
so the extra expense argument does not work,
Try Again.


Go troll somewhere else....mmmmkay??



reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 06:44 PM by Gmoneycricket
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to
post by Gmoneycricket



The weather service has planes in the air everyday,
so the extra expense argument does not work,
Try Again.


Go troll somewhere else....mmmmkay??



I have been a member longer then you SIR!

I will move on if you will SIR!

So you are admitting you have no means to back the facts,
you claim with samples of man made clouds?
It is easier to try and chase me away?


reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 06:48 PM by Ivar_Karlsen
reply to post by Gmoneycricket



Since you claim there is a conspiracy it is up to you to back that up with facts, so far there has been none.


reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 06:56 PM by Gmoneycricket
Originally posted by Ivar_Karlsen
reply to
post by Gmoneycricket



Since you claim there is a conspiracy it is up to you to back that up with facts, so far there has been none.




I can
Cancer causing chemicals in contrails,
from combustion of petroleum fuels.
Your turn..


reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 06:56 PM by ProudBird
reply to post by Gmoneycricket



Not sure if I should "rise" to your "challenge" (sir??)....

So you are admitting you have no means to back the facts.....


But....I have provided NOTHING but facts.

Hope everyone else can claim the same. .... (??)


reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 06:57 PM by Gmoneycricket
Originally posted by Ivar_Karlsen
reply to
post by Gmoneycricket



Since you claim there is a conspiracy it is up to you to back that up with facts, so far there has been none.




Global dimming from shade created from byproducts of combustion,
in all forms of man made travel.
Your turn...


reply posted on 5-5-2012 @ 07:07 PM by Gmoneycricket
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to
post by Gmoneycricket



Not sure if I should "rise" to your "challenge" (sir??)....

So you are admitting you have no means to back the facts.....


But....I have provided NOTHING but facts.

Hope everyone else can claim the same. .... (??)


Give me parts per million of the exhaust of aircraft and prove,
there is no chemicals in a contrail.
Prove there is no effects to the environment from global dimming when I have watched you discuss
how contrails will shade the clouds below them.
That is 2 simple ones to start with.


reply posted on 6-5-2012 @ 05:49 AM by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Gmoneycricket





I can Cancer causing chemicals in contrails, from combustion of petroleum fuels. Your turn..


Just a quick observation here, but you seem to be only fixated with cancer being caused by contrails and yet you still have not proven in this thread or any other that anyone has ever died or contracted cancer because of exposure to contrails.So again I ask for the proof that anyone has ever contracted cancer because of contrails.

Maybe you should be more worried about these causing cancer...





Than I would these causing cancer....






reply posted on 6-5-2012 @ 11:58 PM by Gmoneycricket
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to
post by Gmoneycricket





I can Cancer causing chemicals in contrails, from combustion of petroleum fuels. Your turn..


Just a quick observation here, but you seem to be only fixated with cancer being caused by contrails and yet you still have not proven in this thread or any other that anyone has ever died or contracted cancer because of exposure to contrails.So again I ask for the proof that anyone has ever contracted cancer because of contrails.

Maybe you should be more worried about these causing cancer...





Than I would these causing cancer....





Thank You
The pictures back up the truth as you have shown us pictures of cities with airports in them and
we all know that planes pollute the most during take off,
adding to the smog.

And the pictures of contrails above clouds show that persistent contrails may expand
and effect how clouds would react without man made clouds shading them.

I will let it slide how you were talking down to us again like a second class citizens,
as you again try to twist the truth that contrail pollution is harmless.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



NOAA Doc Strong Evidence They Are and Have Been Spraying Us
  Posted 15 days ago with 36 member flags
Chemtrail Programs Only Cost Us $5 Billion a Year
  Posted 5 days ago with 8 member flags
Cost analysis of aerosol solar radiation management published
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
How do elites escape chemtrails?
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
ChemTrails over Michigan
  Posted 11 days ago with 3 member flags
Geo-engineering (Chemtrails) and Bible Prophecy
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags