It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The system will be able to monitor information that was previously difficult to reach. "I think that you can't try to catch everything," she said, "because that will make the censor lose its relevance, and furthermore – its morality." Vaknin-Gil added that "as the chief censor, I have no intention of going into people's personal diaries, and it important for me to note that we do not 'sit' on private Facebook accounts." Referring to recent incidents of censored information being published on social networks and blogs – notably by Jewish-American blogger Richard Silverstein - Vaknin-Gil said that "the censor is perceived as a body trying to control the Internet, to no avail. This is mistake – we try to operate within the Internet only in terms of elements related to us."
Since social networks are world wide, isn’t it the same as spying on the whole world?
How do we know what is related to them only?
And how do we know if' it's abused by someone for some kind of personal agenda?
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by maxella1
And how do we know if' it's abused by someone for some kind of personal agenda?
Since we're at ATS, lets take this down the rabbit hole.
FEMA camps. Continuity of government. Israel tagging users on social networks as "discontents".
Kinda looks ugly to me.