So why would hijackers crash planes into the twin towers anyway?

page: 9
5
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join

posted on May, 31 2012 @ 12:28 PM
link   
reply to post by thedman
 


I don't have a paranoid obsession. Just talking about something that is peculiar. It's the ONE WORLD Trade Center after all and not the World Trade Center as it was before. With a height of 1776 feet. I feel there is a hidden meaning behind it.
edit on 31-5-2012 by soaringhawk because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 3 2012 @ 03:03 PM
link   
John Lear son of the inventor of the Lear Jet provides some good info on planes and the twin towers...

I know 'debunkers' like to call this hoax info, but 'debunkers' are disinfo agents after all, so anything that goes against the OS is natuarally a hoax to them! John Lear's credentials speak for themselves..

______beforeitsnews/story/1935/777/9_11_Airplane_Affidavit_By_John_Lear,_Son_Of_Learjet_Inventor.html?currentSplittedPage=0

[SNIPPED]

IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
MOD NOTE: Posting work written by others
edit on Sun Jun 3 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2012 @ 03:04 PM
link   
IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
MOD NOTE: Posting work written by others
edit on Sun Jun 3 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2012 @ 03:07 PM
link   
IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
MOD NOTE: Posting work written by others
edit on Sun Jun 3 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2012 @ 03:11 PM
link   
IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
MOD NOTE: Posting work written by others


edit on Sun Jun 3 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2012 @ 03:30 PM
link   

E. The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed 39 inches in center, at over 500 mph. This fuselage section would be telescopically crumpled had it actually penetrated the building as depicted in the CNN video. It is impossible for it to have then re-emerged from the building and then fallen intact and unburned as depicted.



This would be true if the wall hadn't given way when the nose gear impacted it. Can you explain to us why a plane should continue to crumple after what it is impacting is gone ?

That piece of debris is from the tail of the plane and can be traced directly back to UA175 - N612UA.




edit on 3-6-2012 by waypastvne because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2012 @ 03:56 PM
link   
reply to post by waypastvne
 


Your post is totally fake, staged photos, the lack of burn marks are a give away. Besides, most people say they saw a black small plane or missile with wings, this does not fit that description.



posted on Jun, 3 2012 @ 04:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by kidtwist
reply to post by waypastvne
 


Your post is totally fake, staged photos, the lack of burn marks are a give away. Besides, most people say they saw a black small plane or missile with wings, this does not fit that description.







Can you explain to us why a plane should continue to crumple after what it is impacting is gone ?



posted on Jun, 3 2012 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by waypastvne

Originally posted by kidtwist
reply to post by waypastvne
 


Your post is totally fake, staged photos, the lack of burn marks are a give away. Besides, most people say they saw a black small plane or missile with wings, this does not fit that description.


Can you explain to us why a plane should continue to crumple after what it is impacting is gone ?



What exactly are you on about?!



posted on Jun, 3 2012 @ 05:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Insolubrious
Can anyone tell me what was the reason was for hijacking two planes and crashing them into the twin towers. Why go through so much trouble? In terms of the official story and historically it doesn't make any sense, unless of course the intention was to take the buildings down.

Can you think of any logical reason behind the idea EXCEPT to bring the towers down?


Operation

To prove the concept feasible, as an asset.



posted on Jun, 3 2012 @ 05:42 PM
link   
Not too difficult to parse their motives.

Bin Laden's people had tried to blow up the WTC with a truck bomb in 1993.

Bin Laden felt it was important to show the world (esp the Western infidels) that he could finish the job and achieve his goal.

In the past 30 or 40 years various Muslim radicals found in desirable to demonstrate an apparent total absence of fear by conducting suicide attacks. A demonstrated intent to die to achieve their destructive goal pretty much establishes in the mind of the opposition that deterrence doesn't work.

In the case of the WTC, there is some evidence to indicate that ONLY the four pilot hijackers knew this was a suicide mission; the other hijackers, who were there to help seize the cockpit and bully the passengers, may have been told that the plane was going to land somewhere and ransom would be demanded.

In the case of Sept 11th, the destruction, not merely of four planeloads of passengers, but the total destruction of the towers that had dominated the skyline of America's principal city, and of the Pentagon, and (presumably) the US Capitol or the White House --- in other words, four of the most impressive and important - and iconic - structures in the US -- would have had an enormous psychological effect on Americans and lots of others as well. And, indeed, it did.



posted on Jun, 3 2012 @ 05:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by kidtwist
John Lear son of the inventor of the Lear Jet provides some good info on planes and the twin towers...

I know 'debunkers' like to call this hoax info, but 'debunkers' are disinfo agents after all, so anything that goes against the OS is natuarally a hoax to them! John Lear's credentials speak for themselves..

______beforeitsnews/story/1935/777/9_11_Airplane_Affidavit_By_John_Lear,_Son_Of_Learjet_Inventor.html?currentSplittedPage=0

[SNIPPED]

IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
MOD NOTE: Posting work written by others
edit on Sun Jun 3 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



TO MOD: 'donttreadonme'

I posted an affidavit by John Lear, how is that 'work' by others, and how is that considered off topic moderator 'donttreadonme'??

Why have you as a mod removed those 2 posts, and ignored other off topic posts?

Everyone here posts content from other websites, and if John Lear writes an affidavit, and I wish to post it, how else am I supposed to present it?!

You have some bizarre rules here, selective modding again.
edit on 3-6-2012 by kidtwist because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 03:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by Shoonra
Not too difficult to parse their motives.

Bin Laden's people had tried to blow up the WTC with a truck bomb in 1993.

Bin Laden felt it was important to show the world (esp the Western infidels) that he could finish the job and achieve his goal.



Yes very good, so you think there is some connection to 1993 which was to bring down the buildings on purpose. So if you believe Osama came back to finish the job, what do you think of his comments where he states he wasn't expecting the buildings to collapse, seems to be rather contradictory don't you think?

edit on 7-6-2012 by Insolubrious because: (no reason given)





new topics
top topics
 
5
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join