posted on May, 1 2012 @ 11:19 PM
Many of you post on these forums, many read thoroughly topics related to your own interests whether economic, political, paranormal, or generally
conspiratorial. One of the topics I rarely see discussed, is "Real Cost."
Sustainability as defined by me substantiates that in order for something to be sustainable you must be able to replenish what has been used. Thereby
leaving future generations with something of value and something to hope for.
Our economy is designed to not be sustainable as it milks the real value and asset out of everything and turns the value into debt. Fiat currency was
only devised by financial minds in order to allow governments to become large enough, powerful enough to do their bidding. It is the perfect
system.... for turning the real value of mankind into the debt of mankind, otherwise known as slavery. The system is designed for the already rich or
the newly rich to be able to keep their wealth and live off the interest which is paid by the poor. The greedier the rich get the poorer the rest of
Before someone accuses me of being socialist, hear me out. It is ok for someone to become successful. It is not ok for someone to be able to take
their success and then milk the less fortunate. That is inherently encroaching on the rights of all free people. This thread is not about protecting
the bottom feeders of society that choose by their own free will to milk the system and do not become active members of their respective communities.
And I mean what I mean here, the entitlement programs shouldn't exist, but entitlements are a way of saying hey, I know you people are getting raped
of your livelihoods in order to make these rich people richer, here is what I will give you in order to keep you quiet so we can continue a little
longer until it all collapses. The safety net is getting larger and larger, and the jobs get worse and worse.
Its funny now that we start to have some manufacturing returning to the USA from places like china that the actual wage of the workers today in
America, making the same products they did before they left for china will now make less than they did 2 decades ago doing the same job.
I will just pick one topic, vaccine production. Vaccines have attributed to a very large number of issues in our society that have been almost proven
without a doubt. But the actual vaccines are a great thing for humanity, it is an artificial way to boost the immune system to fight known disease
and in some cases all but irradiate the disease from the world.
vaccines contain a host of chemicals, most of which are added to the mixture in order to increase the shelf life of the product. I see this as a
greedy evil way of doing business, and should not be allowed, allowing pharmaceutical companies to add these items, prevents these ever expanding
companies from having to localize production of vaccines in smaller businesses. (you know creating local money that feeds local economy and makes
local community's stronger and sustainable) they say that this is somehow supposed to be a step forward for humanity, but it is very plainly obvious
to me and I hope to others that this is a screaming example of why no "LARGE" corporations should exist period. There is no public need that is met
by large corporations that local business could not do better.
And I challenge anyone to think of ONE THING that beats local and regional economies in "REAL COST." Because REAL COST is the ABSOLUTE measure of
sustainability. Currency markets, currency speculation, commodity speculation, nothing in our economy has had the REAL COST changed without
innovation. ONE CORPORATION with all the money, led by 1-12 individuals with different political and financial ties to other industries will do
absolutely nothing compared to 1,000 smaller companies with literally thousands more people that are apart of the process. Will that large
corporation make more money splitting up, there may be a few cases, but overall, no? And in that one fact lies one of the absolutes of why collapse
is inevitable. The fact that the economy is led by people who hope to consolidate power and wealth into the hands of a few, And the laws are always
changed to meet the growing needs of corporate greed. Because they see that the larger a company is the more efficient it "appears" to be. Its a
perception that is perpetuated by our financial system. The only politician who understands this (and is willing to fix the ACTUAL problem) is
Congressman Ron Paul.
It is much more efficient to make a vaccine that is "ORDERED" and used locally without the need for large amounts of harmful chemicals, toxic
substances, because the vaccines would be produced regionally. Would they be more expensive, maybe, but the economy preventing stewardship of our
planet is a PRIMARY problem that must be resolved. Carbon tax is more scam to feed a fake money system with more fake money so that rich people will
have something else to milk of value. I am not covering all the points I want to make, because this is getting too long, and many of these points
that I have made can be debated forever, as no one that I speak to associates the actual common sense meaning of "REAL COST" into their thoughts and
actions. And in many cases people will go to an accounting book for the definition, which is not the real meaning of the term. I am using I am
using the term to describe the waste of resources when closing a 4 billion dollar plant in one country only to build another 4 billion dollar plant in
another country. the real cost of that is astronomical. the real cost of making a product and shipping it across the world (especially when it is
not needed) Is just another reason why large corporations are the real plague. Large corporations are the BUTT of humanity. There really is no
reason for them to be here, on this planet.
Out of 100 hundred small businesses in the same field, maybe 10-15 will survive and thrive. But only because of innovation. The constant recycling
of bad ideas into large corporations is evident in the laws they pay to change in order to remain "efficient" TOO BIG TO FAIL, means that when a
corporation is allowed to become powerful enough to take the real value out of your labor, and LIFE, with one bad day - it is a RISK. And a severe
risk. It is akin to running a red light to get to work faster. Why even do it, what really is the point of private and public corporations having
the power to not only manipulate the public, but also the government in the country they reside. Sounds to me like the biggest security risk
countries face is their own corporations. Sounds like people need to start busting these companies up and creating sustainable regional economies.
I mean if I work for homeland security, i am having briefings on how to reduce the fallout and ultimately reverse the corruption and corporate
takeover of America. Why would I give two craps, about the 4yr old on a plane that is suspected of handing a weapon to grandma? Why am I worried
about the security threat that untrained, armed, or even highly trained citizens present to society? the answer to that question you already know.
HOMELAND SECURITY, TSA, CIA, DEA, ATF, I could go on, these government agents are not public servants - they are corporate servants. THE END - will
have some links to provide tomorrow. Not really wanting to finish this tonight.