I just finished watching the 30min reality check delegate special and considering bound delegates and how many are left unbound it would seem that
Mitt Romney could only get 1073 the first round if he gets all of the unbound delegates. Mitt is definitely not the winner outright. The question is
if he'll buy enough votes from Newt/Rick's delegates to get a quick 2nd round win. I hope that is not the case but with a candidate who has an
anagram of the word money in their last name it seems very possible.
Hopefully people have an understanding of how the subconscious works. I believe Romney was chosen at some meeting, Bilderberg or other, with this
being a partially deciding factor. Take the following paragraph for example:
If yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too. Cna yuo raed tihs? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can. i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty
uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht
oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and
you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh?
yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs forwrad it.
The letters are scrambled yet you still know whats being said. The subconscious works in a way similar to this. Your brain computes far more than
you are led to believe. We are pattern followers. Advertising uses subliminal stuff like this all the time. Mitt Romney is the candidate they want
you to choose if you want money. He's a stereotypical rich guy in every sense of it. If you still don't believe me here is a short youtube video
on fast food advertising. Same idea, different product.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.