It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
even with diffusion ,plutonium is 2 million times more radioactive than uranium.If it was uranium I would not be concerned.Nuclear weapons cesium and strontium radionuclides are survivable. But plutonium?
Anyways would you be willing to stay in Fukushima for a year to prove radioactivity is harmless?
Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by SheopleNation
It won't be an extinction level event.It will be a slow death for centuries .victims should be around 200-300 million in a period of 50-100 years.But the extinction level events are incoming in the next 20-30 years.
You can talk until you're blue in the face, it makes no difference to me. Fukushima is polluting the pacific ocean, just as the gulf oil spill is polluting the gulf of mexico, as well as the Atlantic Ocean and most likely the Pacific by now as well. I don't understand why you're so hostile?
Your lack of education only exposes the fact that you waste way too much time trying to troll folks here at ATS instead of doing your own homework from your teacher today.
Fact is, You know nothing about the Fukushima disaster.
You're ust pulling cans of bs out of your hat while expecting it to be a rabbit.
Listen, All the mindless drivel sounds good to the average know nothing
but at the end of the day you're just an excuse maker for the criminals who are destroying planet Earth.
Obviously you're here to cause trouble, otherwise you would have just let this all go after Don't tread on me edited both of our posts.
You need to learn some respect for ATS instead of waving your middle finger at those who are here to moderate it which at the end of the day makes this website the best on the interent.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
I never said that Fukushima WASN'T radioactive, OR releasing pollution into the oceans.
I am disagreeing about the SCALE and SCOPE of the Accident.
and I am doing so, by producing cold hard facts.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
reply to post by SheopleNation
I apologize: "Hostile Media Effect" is the Cognitive Bias I was referring to:
Calm down child!
So much passion defending these destroyers of Planet Earth.
Gotta wonder bro.
You obviously are coming unhinged again at the expense of your unfinished homework.
Well, that's not on me Jr.
You do this all while ignoring the subject of the thread which is whether Fukushima is polluting the Pacific Ocean with radioative waste or not?
I think it's pretty clear that the agenda to sway the discussion has some what succeeded
but not without seroius damage to the credibility of yourself, if you ever really had any here to begin with.
Again, The subject of the thread is whether Fukushima is polluting the Pacific Ocean or not. All other alternative spin doctoring is nothing more than trolling ATS.
Originally posted by SheopleNation
Don't apologize, just stop trying to derail the subject of this thread. It's about Fukushima and it's effect on the Pacific ocean.
I am suprised that you have not been warned yet.
Radiation has been leaking into the Pacific Ocean for over a year now and it's all swept under the rug in the name of economics, profit and deceit which has been practiced by both The Japanese and American Governments.
That is no longer the number one issue though. The number one issue is how can we the people of the world band together and solve this problem that otherwise will eventually wipe out life on this Earth, or at the very least obstruct its advancement which will sooner or later do the same.
There is no information from studies in humans or animals to identify the specific levels of exposures to plutonium in air, food, or water that have resulted in harmful effects. However, it is generally assumed that any amount of absorbed radiation, no matter how small, may cause some damage. When expressed as the amount of radioactivity deposited in the body per kilogram of body weight (kg bw) as a result of breathing in plutonium, studies in dogs report that 100,000 pCi plutonium/kg bw caused serious lung damage within a few months, 1,700 pCi/kg bw caused harm to the immune system, and 1,400 pCi/kg bw caused bone cancer after 4 years. In each of these cases the dogs were exposed to the plutonium in air for one day.
In the 1940s some 26 workers at US nuclear weapons facilities became contaminated with plutonium. Intensive health checks of these people have revealed no serious consequence and no fatalities that could be attributed to the exposure. In the 1990s plutonium was injected into and inhaled by some volunteers, without adverse effects.