reply to post by SheopleNation
That would be SheopleNation. Pay attention Son.
I'm not your son.
I didn't butt into anything
Yes, actually, you did.
I was arguing a specific point in regards to MindWar's post, I posted the DATA about the Uranium contained in the oceans to dismiss his implied
assertion that the oceans were free of radioactivity until the fukushima event.
You, interjected saying that I was forgetting about plutonium, and other radionucliotides, which had nothing to do with either MY point, or what I was
responding to that MindWar said.
Your entire post was a childish attempt to draw attention to yourself, despite the fact that you weren't even participating in the discussion, or
providing a rebuttal that was coherent, or rational.
this is a discussion forum. If you can't hadle the heat, then stay out of the kitchen.
Same to you, "Buddy"
Listen my young, misled foolish mortal, you have now resorted to just blowing drivel out of your pie-hole.
Would you like to explain why your statement is correct?
The discussion is focused on whether Fukushima is polluting the pacific or not.
The Pollution referred to in this thread isn't the deleterious effects of homeopathically diffuse heavy metals.
The discussion is in regards *ENTIRELY* to the presence of RADIATION, and those certain unstable elements that CAUSE radiation.
This THREAD is an attempt to state that Fukushima will cause the entire ocean to become SO radioactive, that it becomes unlivable to all marine
animals and plants. (hyperbole, mine... but not by much)
However, Pollution simply refers to ANY impurity in ANY amount that is introduced into a natural ecosystem.
And, TECHNICALLY the introduction of heavy metals from the Fukushima disaster IS Pollution, the Radiation that this thread is focused on is basically
a trivial, and statistically negligible amount of radiation.
And that's why I agreed with you that Fukushima was POLLUTING the oceans, because it IS TECHNICALLY releasing impurities into it.
You seem to disagree with my position that the Naturally occurring Uranium in the oceans is *FAR* greater than the *ENTIRE MASS OF THE CITY OF
And that is why we are having this entire sad, sorry discussion, despite the fact that the foundations of your argumentative position (however poorly
laid they were) has already been washed out to sea.
Yes, I know I am inside your head, but let's just stick to the topic at hand ok?
What exactly are you babbling on about?
Because from here, you are actually just spouting nonsense.
You're already making a fool of yourself in regards to the subject at hand
Again, this is a baseless assertion, with no supporting facts or explanation as to WHY anyone here should take you seriously about your claim.
And to Retort in Kind... You are a Big Poopy Head.
so I would advise you to refrain from making the same mistake twice.
Unfortunatly, I cannot comply with your request, for I would have had to make a single mistake in the first place.... That, DESPITE your Baseless
Claims and Ardent Wishes, I have NOT.
Oh no, please don't do that. Well, I atleast hope that you have an extra school bus ticket for me then?
No... you are going to MUSH.
edit on 2-5-2012 by ErtaiNaGia because: +pic, spite