Another time traveller photographed with a phone to her ear?

reply to post by Chadwickus


photoshop

Thats a problem I have always had with the notion of "Time Travel" by technological means.
You would of course "jump" to a date, right? And that date would have to be programmed into the "time machine"?
How would "Time" know when 1138 was? Our notion of Wednesday, April or 12 o'clock would just spit back from the device, Does Not Compute. So how would you set a destination?

If you could program a time machine with one, it would "jump" to empty space, because the Earth would be long gone from the spot it and you and the machine are in now.

Is it possible for a time traveler to be behind the times?
If she were a true time traveler, she would be texting

reply to post by Chadwickus


She has nothing in her hands at all.

Thats an old silver filigreed powder satchel container. Only she has caught five bumblebees in it and is seeing if it is turned on and ready to go!

reply to post by Chadwickus


All I see is her ring finger curling further than her pinky which is giving the illusion of something
in her hand. Definitely not a cellphone.

reply to post by Chadwickus

It's her Tricorder and it's making a funny noise, hence her look of slight confusion. If her outfit is Red, she is soon to be Dead.

really chadwickus? you are slipping there I think. a cell phone? really? she came all the way from the future to get caught trying to use her cell phone without proper technology to link a call. (sigghhhh) at least make the device she is holding a trans-dimensional communicator of some sort, or something that sounds like it would be from the future.

You can see shes resting her hand on her cheek which is creating a shadow

All I can think is that is an amazing chair. The different shapes are so unique, i guarantee you can't find that at Ikea.

And it looks like a shadow from her hand in my opinion.

Great! Another one of those threads to ridicule a subject.

I don't know why this is posted in a conspiracy topic, because as long as the article is debunking a mere misinterpretation of a photo, the title is misleading people to say the least.

reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard


Ha! You can talk.

Since the title of the thread is asking a question I don't see how it's misleading...

But anyway, thanks for stopping by

I see what you mean but it is most definitely her fingers.

A posed shot with a device that could change the course of history would be a major problem.

Fingers,

Looks like a finger .....dot dot dot.....

why would anyone take a device for which there was no support infrastructure on a TT trip ?

reply to post by Chadwickus


was it done in CS5 or CS6 beta?

I'm with fingers, without a doubt, it's just shadowing and illusion. It does look weird at first Chad, but after blowing it up, running it through filters yadayada, I can say with 100% confidence, fingers.

reply to post by woogleuk


I agree.

I just find it interesting how a modern perspective is projected onto older images and objects... Like this statue of Apollo:


Dammit, no signal!

It is a very clever pic..It is definitely fingers on the face and a shadow...

The "phone" is actually her ring finger.

Nice one though mate