It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bad News For Obama: EPA Appointee Al Armendariz Resigns !

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 30 2012 @ 12:41 PM
link   
EPA extremist Al Armendariz has resigned in disgrace.

- EPA Al Armendariz Resigns -

Obama has more bad news. It's another resignation. Who's next?

--------
DOJ Attorney Ronald Weich is also resigning. - Fast & Furious -
edit on 30-4-2012 by Eurisko2012 because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 30 2012 @ 02:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 

Watching the mouthpieces for the Administration fall by the wayside offers little consolation for the fact that people like Steven Chu, Eric Holder, John Holdren, Carol Browner (resigned), Lisa Jackson Tim Geithner, and others still call the shots; and these "victims" pay the price for echoing Obama's stated and un-stated policies and objectives.

We should find little joy in this sacrifice; the program will continue; just with different faces.
edit on 30-4-2012 by jdub297 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2012 @ 02:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 

Watching the mouthpieces for the Administration fall by the wayside offers little consolation for the fact that people like Steven Chu, Eric Holder, John Holdren, Carol Browner (resigned), Lisa Jackson Tim Geithner, and others still call the shots; and these "victims" pay the price for echoing Obama's stated and un-stated policies and objectives.

We should find little joy in this sacrifice; the program will continue; just with different faces.
edit on 30-4-2012 by jdub297 because: (no reason given)


Not for much longer.

This time next year the White House will be under new management.


Turbo Tax Cheat Timmy Geithner will be unemployed.



posted on Apr, 30 2012 @ 02:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


What the hell took him so long to resign? He made those comments in 2010. More importantly, why wasn't he fired by the Obama administration when they found out about his comments? Speaks volumes about this administration's level of ethics.

What a fool. At least he confirmed what we already know about the EPA. If the truth is known,I'll bet any good they've done pales in comparison to the unethical crap they've pulled.



posted on Apr, 30 2012 @ 03:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by NightGypsy
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


What the hell took him so long to resign? He made those comments in 2010. More importantly, why wasn't he fired by the Obama administration when they found out about his comments? Speaks volumes about this administration's level of ethics.

What a fool. At least he confirmed what we already know about the EPA. If the truth is known,I'll bet any good they've done pales in comparison to the unethical crap they've pulled.


We held onto that clip until April 2012. We will hit the liberals every week.

More to follow.

The next 3 months will be a nightmare for Obama.



posted on Apr, 30 2012 @ 03:04 PM
link   

Armendariz went on to say that "you make examples out of people who are, in this case, not complying with the law ... and you hit them as hard as you can" -- to act as a "deterrent" to others.


from the OP's article, he should have added, "unless you're a corporate giant and in bed with us" then we do nothing and say everything is safe.



posted on Apr, 30 2012 @ 03:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by NightGypsy
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


What the hell took him so long to resign? He made those comments in 2010.


The MSM will not report and does not consider "newsworthy" statements of policy in keeping with the Progressive/MSM agendas.


More importantly, why wasn't he fired by the Obama administration when they found out about his comments? (Speaks volumes about this administration's level of ethics.)


He was merely putting into words this administration's unspoken, but crystal clear, agenda, to destroy fossil-fuel economics for the benefit of a "green" (read: Progressive) agenda.


What a fool. At least he confirmed what we already know about the EPA. If the truth is known,I'll bet any good they've done pales in comparison to the unethical crap they've pulled.


He's a good and valuable "civil servant" of a socialiust president. Please cite for me the "good they'e [EPA] done" in the last 25 years.

In my experience, as businesses realize the savings from conservation, they've undertaken these changes willingly, as a matter of survival, against competitors and markets that value productivity and lower energy overhead.

Have you looked into the "Kuznets Curve?"

jw

edit on 30-4-2012 by jdub297 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2012 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle

Armendariz went on to say that "you make examples out of people who are, in this case, not complying with the law ... and you hit them as hard as you can" -- to act as a "deterrent" to others.


from the OP's article, he should have added, "unless you're a corporate giant and in bed with us" then we do nothing and say everything is safe.


Armendariz is history.

Don't worry. They will probably hire him at Media Matters.



posted on Apr, 30 2012 @ 03:55 PM
link   
Uhm why is protecting the Environment, you know protecting the only home we have in the 'Verse, a political thing?

Nixon started the EPA, but 4 decades later everything is about politicals of greed... how's that work again?

We have fracking here in PA it is bad news and the more of it that is done the less profitable it will be so more corners will be cut.

We're not talking about the search for the Higgs Boson here.

Derek



posted on May, 2 2012 @ 04:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Viesczy
 

We've fracked our wells in Texas for about 50 years. I'll take the Texas economy against the US' anytime,

The MSM wants the ignorant and the partisan to join in a chorus against this "new" and "dangerous" technology.

Anyone with an ounce a brains and a gram of motivation can find the truth behind the hype.

But, that would defeat the purpose of the progressive agenda, wouldn't it?

jw



posted on May, 2 2012 @ 04:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Viesczy
Uhm why is protecting the Environment, you know protecting the only home we have in the 'Verse, a political thing?


This is not about the "environment," it is about protecting a Progressive foothold and the attention of the credulous.

How many of the credulous have actually looked into the history and technology of fracking?
How many are willing to accept what they are told and prgrammed to hear?

The difference makes all the difference.

deny ignorance

jw




top topics



 
5

log in

join