Originally posted by fnpmitchreturns
Home Owners Across the Nation Sue All Bank Servicers and Their Offshore Havens; Spire Law Officially Announces Filing of Landmark
(visit the link for the full news article)
NEW YORK, NY, Apr 23, 2012 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) -- In a lawsuit alleged to involve the largest money laundering network in United States
history, Spire Law Group, LLP -- on behalf of home owners across the Country -- has filed a mass tort action in the Supreme Court of New York, County
of Kings. Home owners across the country have sued every major bank servicer and their subsidiaries -- formed in countries known as havens for money
laundering such as the Cayman Islands, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg and Malaysia -- alleging that while the Obama Administration was publicly
encouraging loan mod
Related News Links:
edit on 30-4-2012 by fnpmitchreturns because: tey to fix link unable but it works
edit on 30-4-2012 by
fnpmitchreturns because: 2nd attempt to fix link break
GREAT post. Thanks.
I filed with the UCC TRUST division and the SEC Enforcement on April 15th. Haven't heard back from anyone yet.
What I have is a letter from the Comptroller of Currency, in 2005 regarding a Wells Fargo case that he supported. He stated that "TRUSTEE Banks lend
no bank money for mortgages"! and that they are gaining title by other means.
It is actually called "Covet Means", and this was a crime punishable by death because it was a specific method of WARFARE on populations created in
Babylon by the Covens of Azazel, the Corporations and Banks.
What I found is that a securitized audit will locate and show that the money was disgorged from the Bond Account called the Security of the PERSON
which is part of the SS-4 agreement and backed by the National Bank ACT the banks were made trustees of these accounts. So like the guy that bought
the Eiffel tower and then split it and sold the land then the structure..that is what all of them have been doing and in mortgages this is called
bifurcating the mortgage. So the Note is actually unsecured..except for one thing. The Bank LENT no money..not even for the NOTES! This was your
money, your account with your Name and SS# which is the cusip number, and is basically under the Bills of exchange act (BECA 1959-latest vers) it is
called a check 'drawn on own self'.
So they sold the title to your house, and it was not theirs to sell, not by the Social Security Act and not by the rules governing checks drawn on
Then they securitized each and every 'Note" that you probably threw away...that 'bill' is a REMITTANCE. This is a document of title, and when you
threw your copy in the trash, they were holding it on their side, then securitizing those instruments and bundling them into insurance packages and
selling them on the market..for another profit. You see--IT had your name and account number on it! So they simply stole your identity and tapped your
bond again, and again, and again.
In my case I found they also were redirecting my property tax refund checks and cashing them the same way.
So all of this money is stolen...becuase the premise of a 'contract' is fraudulent--they lent you no money, it was drawn from your own account (you
cant steal or be called stealing from your own account) But generated for themselves and all their 'companies' multiple streams of income, based on a
fraud. There was no loan.
I forgot to mention that this is 'Breach of Trust' and when they failed to inform the courts that they were trustees and other like..and then
securitized, traded, etc, those instruments--this is classed by the SEC as Insider Trading. They had privileged inside knowledge of the Security of
the Person, (while everyone else is now told it doesn't exist, I had it in school--and so knew who to write to--the UCC TRUST) and they knew that they
lent no money and could tap it at will.
edit on 9-5-2012 by YellowRoseTx51 because: forgot to mention